Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2151 | MLB | Mike Yastrzemski 10 games | ATL vs CHC | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2152 | MLB | Mike Yastrzemski 10 games | ATL vs CHC | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2153 | MLB | Mike Yastrzemski 10 games | ATL vs CHC | TB | 2.5 | +450 | 0.6 | -1.9 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2154 | MLB | Miles Mikolas 9 games | WSH vs WSN@CIN | K | 4.5 | +210 | 2.2 | -2.3 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2155 | MLB | MJ Melendez 10 games | NYM vs DET | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2156 | MLB | MJ Melendez 10 games | NYM vs DET | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2157 | MLB | Moisés Ballesteros 10 games | CHC vs ATL | H | 1.5 | +230 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2158 | MLB | Moisés Ballesteros 10 games | CHC vs ATL | R | 1.5 | +800 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2159 | MLB | Moisés Ballesteros 10 games | CHC vs ATL | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2160 | MLB | Moisés Ballesteros 10 games | CHC vs ATL | TB | 1.5 | +140 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2161 | MLB | Munetaka Murakami 10 games | CWS vs KCR@CHW | RBI | 1.5 | +450 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2162 | MLB | Myles Straw 10 games | TOR vs TBR | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2163 | MLB | Myles Straw 10 games | TOR vs TBR | RBI | 1.5 | +1300 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2164 | MLB | Nathan Church 10 games | STL vs Athletics | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2165 | MLB | Nathan Church 10 games | STL vs Athletics | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2166 | MLB | Nathaniel Lowe 10 games | CIN vs WSN | R | 1.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2167 | MLB | Nathaniel Lowe 10 games | CIN vs WSN | RBI | 1.5 | +475 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2168 | MLB | Nick Fortes 10 games | TB vs TBR@TOR | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.5 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2169 | MLB | Nick Fortes 10 games | TB vs TBR@TOR | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2170 | MLB | Nico Hoerner 10 games | CHC vs ATL | R | 1.5 | +600 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2171 | MLB | Nico Hoerner 10 games | CHC vs ATL | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2172 | MLB | Nolan Arenado 10 games | AZ vs ARI@TEX | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2173 | MLB | Nolan Arenado 10 games | AZ vs ARI@TEX | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2174 | MLB | Nolan Schanuel 10 games | LAA vs CLE | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2175 | MLB | Oneil Cruz 10 games | PIT vs COL | RBI | 1.5 | +450 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2176 | MLB | Otto Lopez 10 games | MIA vs MIN | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2177 | MLB | Owen Caissie 10 games | MIA vs MIN | H | 1.5 | +475 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2178 | MLB | Owen Caissie 10 games | MIA vs MIN | R | 1.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.2 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2179 | MLB | Owen Caissie 10 games | MIA vs MIN | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.4 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2180 | MLB | Owen Caissie 10 games | MIA vs MIN | TB | 1.5 | +180 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2181 | MLB | Ozzie Albies 10 games | ATL vs CHC | R | 1.5 | +600 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2182 | MLB | Patrick Bailey 10 games | CLE vs LAA | H | 1.5 | +450 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2183 | MLB | Patrick Bailey 10 games | CLE vs LAA | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2184 | MLB | Patrick Bailey 10 games | CLE vs LAA | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2185 | MLB | Pete Alonso 10 games | BAL vs NYY | TB | 1.5 | +150 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -2.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2186 | MLB | Pete Crow-Armstrong 10 games | CHC vs ATL | R | 1.5 | +900 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2187 | MLB | Ramon Laureano 10 games | SD vs SDP@MIL | H | 1.5 | +340 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2188 | MLB | Ramon Laureano 10 games | SD vs SDP@MIL | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2189 | MLB | Ramon Laureano 10 games | SD vs SDP@MIL | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2190 | MLB | Ramon Laureano 10 games | SD vs SDP@MIL | TB | 1.5 | +185 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2191 | MLB | Ramon Laureano 10 games | SD vs SDP@MIL | TB | 2.5 | +320 | 0 | -2.5 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2192 | MLB | Randy Arozarena 10 games | SEA vs HOU | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2193 | MLB | Riley Greene 10 games | DET vs NYM | R | 1.5 | +900 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2194 | MLB | Riley Greene 10 games | DET vs NYM | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2195 | MLB | Royce Lewis 10 games | MIN vs MIA | H | 1.5 | +475 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.3 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2196 | MLB | Royce Lewis 10 games | MIN vs MIA | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2197 | MLB | Ryan Jeffers 10 games | MIN vs MIA | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +-0 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2198 | MLB | Ryan O'Hearn 10 games | PIT vs COL | R | 1.5 | +700 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2199 | MLB | Ryan O'Hearn 10 games | PIT vs COL | RBI | 1.5 | +475 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2200 | MLB | Ryan Vilade 10 games | TB vs TBR@TOR | R | 1.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.