Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51 | MLB | Denzer Guzman 10 games | LAA vs DET@LAA | TB | 1.5 | +195 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.7 | 35 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 52 | MLB | George Springer 10 games | TOR vs CHW@TOR | RBI | 1.5 | +500 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.6 | 35 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 53 | MLB | Cooper Pratt 10 games | MIL vs MIA@MIL | TB | 1.5 | +210 | 1 | -0.5 | 2/5 | -1 | 34 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 54 | MLB | Rhys Hoskins 10 games | CLE vs PIT@CLE | H | 0.5 | -115 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 34 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 55 | MLB | Anthony Seigler 10 games | BOS vs TBR@BOS | H | 0.5 | -190 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 33 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 56 | MLB | Cole Carrigg 10 games | COL vs CIN@COL | H | 0.5 | -200 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 33 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 57 | MLB | Adley Rutschman 10 games | BAL vs BAL@HOU | R | 0.5 | +130 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 58 | MLB | Adley Rutschman 10 games | BAL vs BAL@HOU | TB | 1.5 | +141 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 59 | MLB | Anthony Seigler 10 games | BOS vs TBR@BOS | HR | 0.5 | +800 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 60 | MLB | Brandon Lowe 10 games | PIT vs PIT@CLE | RBI | 0.5 | +211 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 61 | MLB | Brandon Lowe 10 games | PIT vs PIT@CLE | TB | 1.5 | +150 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 62 | MLB | Buddy Kennedy 9 games | SEA vs SFG@SEA | H | 0.5 | +100 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 63 | MLB | Buddy Kennedy 9 games | SEA vs SFG@SEA | R | 0.5 | +185 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 64 | MLB | Christian Walker 10 games | HOU vs BAL@HOU | R | 0.5 | +135 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 65 | MLB | Cole Carrigg 10 games | COL vs CIN@COL | TB | 1.5 | +120 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 66 | MLB | Cooper Pratt 10 games | MIL vs MIA@MIL | R | 0.5 | +165 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 67 | MLB | Daniel Susac 10 games | SF vs SFG@SEA | RBI | 0.5 | +300 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 68 | MLB | Denzer Guzman 10 games | LAA vs DET@LAA | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 69 | MLB | Denzer Guzman 10 games | LAA vs DET@LAA | RBI | 0.5 | +280 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 70 | MLB | Dominic Canzone 10 games | SEA vs SFG@SEA | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 71 | MLB | Drew Gilbert 10 games | SF vs SFG@SEA | R | 0.5 | +225 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 72 | MLB | Drew Gilbert 10 games | SF vs SFG@SEA | RBI | 0.5 | +344 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 73 | MLB | Edwin Arroyo 10 games | CIN vs CIN@COL | H | 1.5 | +200 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 74 | MLB | Edwin Arroyo 10 games | CIN vs CIN@COL | TB | 1.5 | +138 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 75 | MLB | Ezequiel Tovar 10 games | COL vs CIN@COL | TB | 1.5 | +160 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 76 | MLB | Francisco Alvarez 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.5 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 77 | MLB | Francisco Alvarez 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | R | 0.5 | +135 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.5 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 78 | MLB | Ildemaro Vargas 10 games | AZ vs STL@ARI | R | 0.5 | +175 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 79 | MLB | Ildemaro Vargas 10 games | AZ vs STL@ARI | RBI | 0.5 | +210 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 80 | MLB | Joe Mack 10 games | MIA vs MIA@MIL | R | 0.5 | +195 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 81 | MLB | Joe Mack 10 games | MIA vs MIA@MIL | RBI | 0.5 | +250 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 82 | MLB | Julio Rodriguez 6 games | SEA vs SFG@SEA | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 83 | MLB | Ke'Bryan Hayes 3 games | CIN vs CIN@COL | R | 0.5 | +120 | 0.3 | -0.2 | 1/3 | +0 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 84 | MLB | Kyle Teel 10 games | CWS vs CHW@TOR | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 85 | MLB | Marcell Ozuna 10 games | PIT vs PIT@CLE | R | 0.5 | +155 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 86 | MLB | Marcell Ozuna 10 games | PIT vs PIT@CLE | RBI | 0.5 | +230 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 87 | MLB | Noelvi Marte 10 games | CIN vs CIN@COL | TB | 1.5 | +102 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 88 | MLB | Otto Lopez 10 games | MIA vs MIA@MIL | H | 1.5 | +195 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 89 | MLB | Otto Lopez 10 games | MIA vs MIA@MIL | RBI | 0.5 | +226 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 90 | MLB | Otto Lopez 10 games | MIA vs MIA@MIL | TB | 1.5 | +121 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 91 | MLB | Victor Robles 10 games | SEA vs SFG@SEA | RBI | 0.5 | +250 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 92 | MLB | Vinnie Pasquantino 10 games | KC vs SDP@KCR | RBI | 0.5 | +157 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 93 | MLB | Daniel Susac 10 games | SF vs SFG@SEA | H | 0.5 | -110 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 31 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 94 | MLB | Bobby Witt Jr. 10 games | KC vs SDP@KCR | R | 0.5 | -140 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 30 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 95 | MLB | Adley Rutschman 10 games | BAL vs BAL@HOU | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 96 | MLB | Adley Rutschman 10 games | BAL vs BAL@HOU | RBI | 0.5 | +211 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 97 | MLB | Anthony Seigler 10 games | BOS vs TBR@BOS | R | 0.5 | +125 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 98 | MLB | Bobby Witt Jr. 10 games | KC vs SDP@KCR | HR | 0.5 | +325 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 99 | MLB | Bobby Witt Jr. 10 games | KC vs SDP@KCR | RBI | 0.5 | +120 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 100 | MLB | Brandon Lowe 10 games | PIT vs PIT@CLE | HR | 0.5 | +400 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.