📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← Jun 29 – Jul 12 →
Wins
32
Losses
20
Push
8
Win %
61.5%
Pending
0
Thu 10/22 Wed 10/21 Tue 10/20 Mon 10/19 Sun 10/18 Sat 10/17 Fri 10/16 Thu 10/15 Wed 10/14 Tue 10/13 Mon 10/12 Sun 10/11 Sat 10/10 Fri 10/9
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
CHI @ DAL WNBA
Points 21.5 OVER
69.3 B
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
61
Clean
28.2
Fit
4
2
CHI @ DAL WNBA
Rebounds 4.5 OVER
67.2 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
49
Clean
27.6
Fit
5
3
SEA @ WSH WNBA
Assists 2.5 OVER
63.9 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
56
Clean
22.2
Fit
5
4
CHI @ DAL WNBA
Assists 6.5 OVER
63.3 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
43
Clean
28.6
Fit
5

📋 Full Board (117 picks · Page 1/5)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
1 Paige Bueckers CHI @ DAL Points 21.5 69.3 B 28.2 4 Pending
2 Paige Bueckers CHI @ DAL Rebounds 4.5 67.2 B- 27.6 5 Pending
3 Flau'jae Johnson SEA @ WSH Assists 2.5 63.9 B- 22.2 5 Pending
4 Paige Bueckers CHI @ DAL Assists 6.5 63.3 B- 28.6 5 Pending
5 Jonquel Jones NY @ TORONTO Rebounds 9.5 63 B- 22.4 5 Pending
6 Marina Mabrey NY @ TORONTO Points 20.5 62.7 C+ 20.7 4 Pending
7 Kelsey Mitchell IND @ LV Points 22.5 59.2 C+ 13.1 4 Pending
8 Maria Conde NY @ TORONTO Rebounds 5.5 59.2 C+ 21.5 5 Pending
9 Kiki Iriafen SEA @ WSH Rebounds 9.5 58.6 C+ 17.8 5 Pending
10 Marina Mabrey NY @ TORONTO Rebounds 4.5 57.6 C+ 21.3 5 Pending
11 Sonia Citron SEA @ WSH Points 16.5 57.1 C+ 17.3 4 Pending
12 Flau'jae Johnson SEA @ WSH Rebounds 4.5 57 C+ 20.1 5 Pending
13 Shakira Austin SEA @ WSH Rebounds 8.5 56.7 C 11.6 5 Pending
14 Sonia Citron SEA @ WSH Rebounds 3.5 56.2 C 17.6 5 Pending
15 Azzi Fudd CHI @ DAL Points 14.5 55.5 C 26.9 4 Pending
16 Arike Ogunbowale CHI @ DAL Rebounds 2.5 55.4 C 20 5 Pending
17 Marina Mabrey NY @ TORONTO Assists 3.5 54.7 C 21 5 Pending
18 Sabrina Ionescu NY @ TORONTO Rebounds 4.5 54.5 C 21 5 Pending
19 Jonquel Jones NY @ TORONTO Assists 2.5 54.5 C 21.4 5 Pending
20 Jessica Shepard CHI @ DAL Rebounds 12.5 53.6 C 17.1 5 Pending
21 Sabrina Ionescu NY @ TORONTO Points 17.5 53.5 C 21.9 4 Pending
22 Maria Conde NY @ TORONTO Assists 2.5 53.1 C 19 5 Pending
23 Jonquel Jones NY @ TORONTO Points 15.5 52.9 C 22.4 4 Pending
24 Sabrina Ionescu NY @ TORONTO Assists 5.5 52.2 C 22.3 5 Pending
25 Flau'jae Johnson SEA @ WSH Points 13.5 51.8 C 20.1 4 Pending
Showing 1–25 of 117 picks
← Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next →

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.