📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← Jul 18 →
Wins
3
Losses
3
Win %
50%
Pending
0
Thu 10/22 Wed 10/21 Tue 10/20 Mon 10/19 Sun 10/18 Sat 10/17 Fri 10/16 Thu 10/15 Wed 10/14 Tue 10/13 Mon 10/12 Sun 10/11 Sat 10/10 Fri 10/9
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
POR @ MIN WNBA
Points 17.5 OVER
79.1 B+
  • Projected edge vs line
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
80
Clean
28.6
Fit
4
2
NY @ IND WNBA
Points 20.5 OVER
73.7 B
  • Projected edge vs line
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
70
Clean
28.2
Fit
4
3
NY @ IND WNBA
Rebounds 7.5 OVER
69.9 B
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
52
Clean
28.6
Fit
5
4
NY @ IND WNBA
Points 16.5 OVER
68.4 B-
  • Projected edge vs line
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
69
Clean
22.9
Fit
4

📋 Full Board (88 picks · Page 2/4)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
26 Sonia Citron WSH @ GSV Assists 2.5 53 C 16.8 5 Pending
27 Jonquel Jones NY @ IND Points 14.5 51.8 C 22.7 4 Pending
28 Sarah Ashlee Barker POR @ MIN Rebounds 5.5 50 D 12.1 5 Pending
29 Shakira Austin WSH @ GSV Assists 2.5 48.2 D 18.5 5 Pending
30 Kiki Iriafen WSH @ GSV Assists 1.5 47.2 D 18.8 5 Pending
35 Aliyah Boston NY @ IND Points 16.5 46.2 D 11.8 4 Pending
36 Kiki Iriafen WSH @ GSV Points 13.5 46 D 19.8 4 Pending
37 Aliyah Boston NY @ IND Rebounds 8.5 45.8 D 11.4 5 Pending
38 Bridget Carleton POR @ MIN Points 13.5 45.3 D 22 4 Pending
40 Kelsey Mitchell NY @ IND 3-Pointers Made 2.5 44.7 D 14.9 0 Pending
42 Natasha Howard POR @ MIN Assists 2.5 44.2 D 10.3 5 Pending
43 Kayla McBride POR @ MIN 3-Pointers Made 2.5 44 D 19.2 0 Pending
44 Sarah Ashlee Barker POR @ MIN Assists 2.5 44 D 11.6 5 Pending
46 Natasha Howard POR @ MIN Rebounds 8.5 43.6 D 11.1 5 Pending
65 Sabrina Ionescu NY @ IND 3-Pointers Made 2.5 41.2 D 14.5 0 Pending
80 Sonia Citron WSH @ GSV Points 15.5 38.2 D 14.7 4 Pending
96 Sarah Ashlee Barker POR @ MIN Points 9.5 35.4 D 8.8 4 Pending
112 Natasha Howard POR @ MIN Points 16.5 33.5 D 12 4 Pending
171 Jonquel Jones NY @ IND 3-Pointers Made 1.5 32.7 D 12.3 0 Pending
178 Bridget Carleton POR @ MIN 3-Pointers Made 2.5 31.6 D 13.1 0 Pending
181 Aliyah Boston NY @ IND Assists 2.5 31.2 D 7.6 5 Pending
184 Courtney Williams POR @ MIN 3-Pointers Made 1.5 31.2 D 15.7 0 Pending
203 Olivia Miles POR @ MIN 3-Pointers Made 1.5 26.3 D 10.2 0 Pending
207 Emily Engstler POR @ MIN Rebounds 5.5 22 D 12.3 -5 Pending
214 Janelle Salaun WSH @ GSV Points 12.5 20.1 D 11.7 -5 Pending
Showing 26–50 of 88 picks

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.