📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← Jul 19 →
Wins
3
Losses
3
Win %
50%
Pending
0
Tue 10/20 Mon 10/19 Sun 10/18 Sat 10/17 Fri 10/16 Thu 10/15 Wed 10/14 Tue 10/13 Mon 10/12 Sun 10/11 Sat 10/10 Fri 10/9 Thu 10/8 Wed 10/7
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
LA @ DAL WNBA
Rebounds 4.5 OVER
71.8 B
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
57
Clean
28.2
Fit
5
2
LA @ DAL WNBA
Points 17.5 OVER
69.3 B
  • Projected edge vs line
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
70
Clean
23.3
Fit
4
3
CHI @ ATL WNBA
Assists 8.5 OVER
68 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
53
Clean
28.3
Fit
5
4
LA @ DAL WNBA
Assists 3.5 OVER
67.7 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
61
Clean
23.5
Fit
5

📋 Full Board (1496 picks · Page 2/60)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
26 Rae Burrell LA @ DAL Rebounds 2.5 58.1 C+ 21.2 5 Pending
27 Angel Reese CHI @ ATL Assists 2.5 57.8 C+ 23 5 Pending
28 Natasha Cloud CHI @ ATL Points 11.5 57.7 C+ 22.6 4 Pending
29 Erica Wheeler LA @ DAL Assists 5.5 57.5 C+ 22 5 Pending
30 Azura Stevens CHI @ ATL Assists 2.5 56.9 C 21.3 5 Pending
31 Rhyne Howard CHI @ ATL Assists 3.5 56.9 C 22.6 5 Pending
32 Ariel Atkins LA @ DAL Points 11.5 56.7 C 22.5 4 Pending
33 Ariel Atkins LA @ DAL Assists 2.5 56.6 C 20.7 5 Pending
34 Azzi Fudd LA @ DAL Rebounds 1.5 56.3 C 20.1 5 Pending
35 Dearica Hamby LA @ DAL Points 15.5 55.8 C 22.4 4 Pending
36 Arike Ogunbowale LA @ DAL Rebounds 2.5 55.3 C 20 5 Pending
37 Allisha Gray CHI @ ATL Assists 2.5 55.1 C 21.6 5 Pending
38 Charlisse Leger-Walker CON @ PHX Assists 4.5 54.9 C 20.9 5 Pending
39 Alyssa Thomas CON @ PHX Points 15.5 54.9 C 22.1 4 Pending
40 Kahleah Copper CON @ PHX Points 21.5 54.2 C 22.3 4 Pending
41 Allisha Gray CHI @ ATL Rebounds 3.5 54.1 C 22 5 Pending
42 Natasha Cloud CHI @ ATL Rebounds 3.5 53.7 C 20.7 5 Pending
43 Leïla Lacan CON @ PHX Assists 5.5 53.5 C 21.9 5 Pending
44 Azura Stevens CHI @ ATL Points 12.5 53.5 C 21.6 4 Pending
45 Nathan Eovaldi TEX TEX @ ATL Strikeouts 5.5 53.1 C 22.3 0 Pending
46 Dearica Hamby LA @ DAL Assists 2.5 52.3 C 22 5 Pending
47 Sean Burke CWS CWS @ TOR Strikeouts 5.5 52.3 C 22 0 Pending
48 Leïla Lacan CON @ PHX Points 14.5 52.1 C 21.4 4 Pending
49 Jessica Shepard LA @ DAL Points 16.5 51.3 C 17.7 4 Pending
50 Christian Yelich MIL MIA @ MIL Hits 0.5 50.9 C 23.2 0 Pending
Showing 26–50 of 1496 picks

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.