📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← Aug 7 →
Wins
0
Losses
0
Push
6
Win %
0%
Pending
0
Fri 10/16 Thu 10/15 Wed 10/14 Tue 10/13 Mon 10/12 Sun 10/11 Sat 10/10 Fri 10/9 Thu 10/8 Wed 10/7 Tue 10/6 Mon 10/5 Sun 10/4 Sat 10/3
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
PHX @ CON WNBA
Assists 8.5 OVER
69.6 B
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
56
Clean
28.4
Fit
5
2
PHX @ CON WNBA
Rebounds 8.5 OVER
68.4 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
51
Clean
27.9
Fit
5
3
PHX @ CON WNBA
Points 15.5 OVER
67.8 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
59
Clean
28
Fit
4
4
PHX @ CON WNBA
Points 10.5 OVER
67.4 B-
  • Projected edge vs line
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
69
Clean
21.8
Fit
4

📋 Full Board (97 picks · Page 2/4)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
38 Kelsey Plum PHX @ CON Assists 4.5 42.3 D 9.7 5 Pending
39 Paige Bueckers GSV @ DAL Rebounds 3.5 41.9 D 9.9 5 Pending
51 Kelsey Plum PHX @ CON Rebounds 1.5 40.6 D 10.1 5 Pending
70 Rhyne Howard ATL @ WSH Rebounds 3.5 39.8 D 9.8 5 Pending
71 Allisha Gray ATL @ WSH Points 18.5 39.7 D 10.4 4 Pending
72 Paige Bueckers GSV @ DAL Assists 5.5 39.5 D 11 5 Pending
74 Allisha Gray ATL @ WSH Assists 2.5 39.4 D 11.7 5 Pending
75 Sonia Citron ATL @ WSH Points 16.5 39.4 D 10.8 4 Pending
80 Jessica Shepard GSV @ DAL Assists 5.5 38.8 D 10 5 Pending
81 Sonia Citron ATL @ WSH Rebounds 3.5 38.4 D 9.7 5 Pending
86 Jessica Shepard GSV @ DAL Points 13.5 37.8 D 10.7 4 Pending
87 Jessica Shepard GSV @ DAL Rebounds 11.5 37.8 D 10.2 5 Pending
90 Kahleah Copper PHX @ CON Points 21.5 37.5 D 10 4 Pending
91 Kahleah Copper PHX @ CON Assists 1.5 37.2 D 8.4 5 Pending
94 Leïla Lacan PHX @ CON Rebounds 2.5 36.6 D 8.6 5 Pending
95 Kelsey Plum PHX @ CON Points 19.5 36.4 D 9.6 4 Pending
99 Leïla Lacan PHX @ CON Assists 4.5 36.1 D 9.6 5 Pending
100 DeWanna Bonner PHX @ CON 3-Pointers Made 1.5 36 D 13.9 0 Pending
108 Veronica Burton GSV @ DAL 3-Pointers Made 1.5 35.2 D 12.4 0 Pending
109 Michaela Onyenwere ATL @ WSH 3-Pointers Made 1.5 35.2 D 13.2 0 Pending
169 Paige Bueckers GSV @ DAL Points 19.5 31.8 D 10.8 4 Pending
177 Allisha Gray ATL @ WSH Rebounds 3.5 30.7 D 7.7 5 Pending
185 Rhyne Howard ATL @ WSH Points 17.5 29.9 D 10.9 4 Pending
186 Azzi Fudd GSV @ DAL 3-Pointers Made 2.5 29.6 D 9.1 0 Pending
189 Leïla Lacan PHX @ CON Points 13.5 27.3 D 11.1 4 Pending
Showing 26–50 of 97 picks

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.