📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← Jul 31 – Aug 13 →
Wins
12
Losses
12
Push
60
Win %
50%
Pending
0
Fri 10/16 Thu 10/15 Wed 10/14 Tue 10/13 Mon 10/12 Sun 10/11 Sat 10/10 Fri 10/9 Thu 10/8 Wed 10/7 Tue 10/6 Mon 10/5 Sun 10/4 Sat 10/3
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
LA @ NY WNBA
Assists 2.5 OVER
65.4 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
59
Clean
22.3
Fit
5
2
LA @ NY WNBA
Rebounds 2.5 OVER
65 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
53
Clean
22.5
Fit
5
3
LA @ NY WNBA
Points 18.5 OVER
64.5 B-
  • Projected edge vs line
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
62
Clean
22.8
Fit
4
4
LA @ NY WNBA
Points 13.5 OVER
63.1 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
60
Clean
22.1
Fit
4

📋 Full Board (97 picks · Page 1/4)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
1 Ariel Atkins LA @ NY Assists 2.5 65.4 B- 22.3 5 Pending
2 Ariel Atkins LA @ NY Rebounds 2.5 65 B- 22.5 5 Pending
3 Sabrina Ionescu LA @ NY Points 18.5 64.5 B- 22.8 4 Pending
4 Dearica Hamby LA @ NY Points 13.5 63.1 B- 22.1 4 Pending
5 Breanna Stewart LA @ NY Rebounds 8.5 62.1 C+ 22.3 5 Pending
6 Chelsea Gray WSH @ LV Points 12.5 61.8 C+ 22.3 4 Pending
7 Rae Burrell LA @ NY Assists 2.5 61.4 C+ 22.1 5 Pending
8 Ariel Atkins LA @ NY Points 9.5 61.2 C+ 22.8 4 Pending
9 Shakira Austin WSH @ LV Points 17.5 61 C+ 22.5 4 Pending
10 Jordin Canada ATL @ CON Assists 8.5 60.5 C+ 22.7 5 Pending
11 Shakira Austin WSH @ LV Rebounds 9.5 60.3 C+ 21.5 5 Pending
12 Dearica Hamby LA @ NY Assists 2.5 60.2 C+ 21.6 5 Pending
13 Erica Wheeler LA @ NY Assists 5.5 58.1 C+ 21.3 5 Pending
14 Sabrina Ionescu LA @ NY Rebounds 4.5 57.5 C+ 21.8 5 Pending
15 Breanna Stewart LA @ NY Assists 3.5 57.4 C+ 21 5 Pending
16 Michaela Onyenwere WSH @ LV Points 7.5 57 C 22.2 4 Pending
17 Sabrina Ionescu LA @ NY Assists 5.5 56.6 C 22.1 5 Pending
18 Rae Burrell LA @ NY Rebounds 2.5 56.4 C 21.9 5 Pending
19 Erica Wheeler LA @ NY Points 9.5 55.9 C 21.3 4 Pending
20 Chelsea Gray WSH @ LV Assists 6.5 55.8 C 22.4 5 Pending
21 Chelsea Gray WSH @ LV Rebounds 2.5 54.4 C 21.1 5 Pending
22 Michaela Onyenwere WSH @ LV Rebounds 2.5 53.3 C 19 5 Pending
23 Jordin Canada ATL @ CON Rebounds 3.5 52.2 C 20.1 5 Pending
24 Shakira Austin WSH @ LV Assists 2.5 52 C 20.8 5 Pending
25 Dearica Hamby LA @ NY Rebounds 7.5 51.9 C 20.5 5 Pending
Showing 1–25 of 97 picks
← Prev 1 2 3 4 Next →

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.