📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← Today
Wins
0
Losses
0
Win %
0%
Pending
6
Sat 10/10 Fri 10/9 Thu 10/8 Wed 10/7 Tue 10/6 Mon 10/5 Sun 10/4 Sat 10/3 Fri 10/2 Thu 10/1 Wed 9/30 Tue 9/29 Sun 9/27 Sat 9/26
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
Runs Batted In 1.5 OVER
46 D
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
50
Clean
21.3
Fit
0
2
Runs Batted In 1.5 OVER
43.4 D
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
47
Clean
20
Fit
0
3
Total Bases 1.5 OVER
39.4 D
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
  • Higher volatility than ideal
Raw
41
Clean
18.9
Fit
0
4
Total Bases 1.5 OVER
39.1 D
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
  • Higher volatility than ideal
Raw
40
Clean
18.8
Fit
0

📋 Full Board (92 picks · Page 4/4)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
76 Sam Antonacci CWS CWS @ CLE Home Runs 0.5 3.2 D 9.2 -5 Pending
77 Tristan Peters CWS CWS @ CLE Home Runs 0.5 3.2 D 9.2 -5 Pending
78 Gavin Williams CLE CWS @ CLE Strikeouts 6.5 3.1 D 9.2 -5 Pending
79 Braden Montgomery CWS CWS @ CLE Runs 1.5 2.2 D 9.2 -5 Pending
80 Kyle Teel CWS CWS @ CLE Hits 1.5 2.2 D 9.2 -5 Pending
81 Andrew Benintendi CWS CWS @ CLE Hits 1.5 1.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
82 Andrew Benintendi CWS CWS @ CLE Runs 1.5 1.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
83 Andrew Benintendi CWS CWS @ CLE Runs Batted In 1.5 1.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
84 Braden Montgomery CWS CWS @ CLE Hits 1.5 1.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
85 Chase Meidroth CWS CWS @ CLE Runs Batted In 1.5 1.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
86 Kyle Teel CWS CWS @ CLE Runs 1.5 1.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
87 Kyle Teel CWS CWS @ CLE Runs Batted In 1.5 1.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
88 Sam Antonacci CWS CWS @ CLE Runs 1.5 1.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
89 Tristan Peters CWS CWS @ CLE Runs Batted In 1.5 1.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
90 Colson Montgomery CWS CWS @ CLE Runs Batted In 1.5 1.6 D 9.2 -5 Pending
91 Munetaka Murakami CWS CWS @ CLE Runs 1.5 1.6 D 9.2 -5 Pending
92 Tristan Peters CWS CWS @ CLE Runs 1.5 1.6 D 9.2 -5 Pending
Showing 76–92 of 92 picks
← Prev 1 2 3 4 Next →

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.