Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 501 | MLB | Tommy Troy 9 games | AZ vs LAD@ARI | H | 0.5 | -155 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 33 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 502 | MLB | Trevor Larnach 10 games | MIN vs KCR@MIN | H | 0.5 | -165 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 33 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 503 | MLB | Adley Rutschman 10 games | BAL vs BAL@BOS | H | 1.5 | +197 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 504 | MLB | Adley Rutschman 10 games | BAL vs BAL@BOS | TB | 1.5 | +105 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 505 | MLB | Adolis Garcia 5 games | PHI vs SDP@PHI | H | 0.5 | -123 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 506 | MLB | Adolis Garcia 5 games | PHI vs SDP@PHI | R | 0.5 | +155 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 507 | MLB | Adolis Garcia 5 games | PHI vs SDP@PHI | RBI | 0.5 | +207 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 508 | MLB | Adrian Houser 9 games | SF vs SFG@MIL | K | 4.5 | +165 | 3.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | +1 | 32 | F | 5.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 509 | MLB | Alec Bohm 10 games | PHI vs SDP@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 510 | MLB | Alec Bohm 10 games | PHI vs SDP@PHI | R | 0.5 | +135 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 511 | MLB | Alec Bohm 10 games | PHI vs SDP@PHI | RBI | 0.5 | +181 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 512 | MLB | Alec Bohm 10 games | PHI vs SDP@PHI | TB | 1.5 | +143 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 513 | MLB | Alex Bregman 10 games | CHC vs Athletics@ | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 514 | MLB | Alex Bregman 10 games | CHC vs Athletics@ | TB | 1.5 | +130 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +-0 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 515 | MLB | Alex Call 10 games | LAD vs LAD@ARI | R | 0.5 | +140 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 516 | MLB | Alex Call 10 games | LAD vs LAD@ARI | TB | 1.5 | +155 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 517 | MLB | Alex Freeland 10 games | LAD vs LAD@ARI | HR | 0.5 | +800 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 518 | MLB | Andruw Monasterio 10 games | BOS vs BAL@BOS | RBI | 0.5 | +180 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 519 | MLB | Andruw Monasterio 10 games | BOS vs BAL@BOS | TB | 1.5 | +135 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 520 | MLB | Andy Pages 10 games | LAD vs LAD@ARI | RBI | 0.5 | +150 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 521 | MLB | Anthony Volpe 10 games | NYY vs CLE@NYY | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +-0 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 522 | MLB | Anthony Volpe 10 games | NYY vs CLE@NYY | RBI | 0.5 | +250 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 523 | MLB | Austin Hedges 10 games | CLE vs CLE@NYY | R | 0.5 | +228 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 524 | MLB | Austin Hedges 10 games | CLE vs CLE@NYY | RBI | 0.5 | +332 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 525 | MLB | Austin Martin 10 games | MIN vs KCR@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +250 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 526 | MLB | Austin Riley 10 games | ATL vs TOR@ATL | R | 0.5 | +135 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 527 | MLB | Austin Riley 10 games | ATL vs TOR@ATL | RBI | 0.5 | +189 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 528 | MLB | Ben Rice 10 games | NYY vs CLE@NYY | HR | 0.5 | +260 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 529 | MLB | Bobby Witt Jr. 10 games | KC vs KCR@MIN | H | 1.5 | +160 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 530 | MLB | Bobby Witt Jr. 10 games | KC vs KCR@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +150 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 531 | MLB | Brandon Lowe 10 games | PIT vs PIT@HOU | HR | 0.5 | +400 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 532 | MLB | Brandon Lowe 10 games | PIT vs PIT@HOU | TB | 1.5 | +131 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 533 | MLB | Brandon Marsh 10 games | PHI vs SDP@PHI | R | 0.5 | +123 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 534 | MLB | Brandon Valenzuela 10 games | TOR vs TOR@ATL | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 535 | MLB | Brandon Valenzuela 10 games | TOR vs TOR@ATL | R | 0.5 | +210 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 536 | MLB | Brandon Valenzuela 10 games | TOR vs TOR@ATL | RBI | 0.5 | +325 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 537 | MLB | Brayan Rocchio 10 games | CLE vs CLE@NYY | H | 1.5 | +450 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 538 | MLB | Brayan Rocchio 10 games | CLE vs CLE@NYY | RBI | 0.5 | +284 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 539 | MLB | Brayan Rocchio 10 games | CLE vs CLE@NYY | TB | 1.5 | +230 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 540 | MLB | Brent Rooker 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | HR | 0.5 | +275 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 541 | MLB | Brent Rooker 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | RBI | 0.5 | +143 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 542 | MLB | Brice Matthews 10 games | HOU vs PIT@HOU | H | 0.5 | -125 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 543 | MLB | Brice Matthews 10 games | HOU vs PIT@HOU | R | 0.5 | +175 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 544 | MLB | Brice Turang 10 games | MIL vs SFG@MIL | R | 1.5 | +550 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 545 | MLB | Brooks Lee 10 games | MIN vs KCR@MIN | H | 1.5 | +200 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 546 | MLB | Brooks Lee 10 games | MIN vs KCR@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 547 | MLB | Bryan Reynolds 10 games | PIT vs PIT@HOU | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 548 | MLB | Bryce Eldridge 10 games | SF vs SFG@MIL | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 549 | MLB | Bryce Eldridge 10 games | SF vs SFG@MIL | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 550 | MLB | Bryce Harper 10 games | PHI vs SDP@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +350 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.