Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 801 | MLB | Blake Dunn 10 games | CIN vs CIN@STL | R | 1.5 | +700 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.6 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 802 | MLB | Blake Dunn 10 games | CIN vs CIN@STL | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 803 | MLB | Blake Perkins 10 games | MIL vs MIL@COL | RBI | 0.5 | +130 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 804 | MLB | Bo Bichette 10 games | NYM vs NYM@SDP | R | 0.5 | +125 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 805 | MLB | Bobby Witt Jr. 10 games | KC vs KCR@MIN | H | 1.5 | +165 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 806 | MLB | Bobby Witt Jr. 10 games | KC vs KCR@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +140 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 807 | MLB | Brandon Lowe 10 games | PIT vs PIT@ATL | H | 1.5 | +240 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 808 | MLB | Brandon Lowe 10 games | PIT vs PIT@ATL | HR | 0.5 | +350 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 809 | MLB | Brandon Lowe 10 games | PIT vs PIT@ATL | R | 1.5 | +600 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 810 | MLB | Brandon Lowe 10 games | PIT vs PIT@ATL | RBI | 1.5 | +475 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 811 | MLB | Brandon Nimmo 10 games | TEX vs CLE@TEX | R | 0.5 | +175 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 812 | MLB | Brandon Nimmo 10 games | TEX vs CLE@TEX | RBI | 0.5 | +210 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 813 | MLB | Brandon Valenzuela 10 games | TOR vs BAL@TOR | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.6 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 814 | MLB | Braxton Fulford 10 games | COL vs MIL@COL | R | 0.5 | +120 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 815 | MLB | Braxton Fulford 10 games | COL vs MIL@COL | RBI | 0.5 | +170 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 816 | MLB | Brayan Rocchio 10 games | CLE vs CLE@TEX | H | 1.5 | +475 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 817 | MLB | Brayan Rocchio 10 games | CLE vs CLE@TEX | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 818 | MLB | Brayan Rocchio 10 games | CLE vs CLE@TEX | TB | 1.5 | +230 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 819 | MLB | Brent Rooker 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | HR | 0.5 | +400 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 820 | MLB | Brent Rooker 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | RBI | 0.5 | +145 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 821 | MLB | Brent Rooker 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | TB | 1.5 | +130 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 6.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 822 | MLB | Brett Baty 10 games | NYM vs NYM@SDP | R | 0.5 | +180 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 823 | MLB | Brett Baty 10 games | NYM vs NYM@SDP | TB | 1.5 | +190 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 824 | MLB | Brice Matthews 10 games | HOU vs Athletics@ | R | 0.5 | +185 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 825 | MLB | Brice Turang 10 games | MIL vs MIL@COL | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 826 | MLB | Brooks Lee 10 games | MIN vs KCR@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 827 | MLB | Brooks Lee 10 games | MIN vs KCR@MIN | R | 0.5 | +120 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 828 | MLB | Brooks Lee 10 games | MIN vs KCR@MIN | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +-0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 829 | MLB | Brooks Lee 10 games | MIN vs KCR@MIN | TB | 1.5 | +130 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 830 | MLB | Bryan Reynolds 10 games | PIT vs PIT@ATL | RBI | 0.5 | +212 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 831 | MLB | Bryce Harper 10 games | PHI vs CHW@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +400 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 832 | MLB | Bryce Harper 10 games | PHI vs CHW@PHI | RBI | 0.5 | +144 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 833 | MLB | Bryson Stott 10 games | PHI vs CHW@PHI | R | 0.5 | +125 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 834 | MLB | Bryson Stott 10 games | PHI vs CHW@PHI | RBI | 0.5 | +180 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 835 | MLB | Byron Buxton 10 games | MIN vs KCR@MIN | H | 1.5 | +190 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 836 | MLB | Byron Buxton 10 games | MIN vs KCR@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +260 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 837 | MLB | Byron Buxton 10 games | MIN vs KCR@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +140 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 838 | MLB | Caleb Durbin 10 games | BOS vs BOS@NYY | R | 0.5 | +200 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 839 | MLB | Cam Smith 10 games | HOU vs Athletics@ | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 840 | MLB | Cam Smith 10 games | HOU vs Athletics@ | TB | 1.5 | +185 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 841 | MLB | Carlos Cortes 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | H | 1.5 | +220 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 842 | MLB | Carson Benge 10 games | NYM vs NYM@SDP | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 843 | MLB | Carson Kelly 10 games | CHC vs SFG@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +257 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 844 | MLB | Ceddanne Rafaela 10 games | BOS vs BOS@NYY | R | 0.5 | +138 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 845 | MLB | Ceddanne Rafaela 10 games | BOS vs BOS@NYY | RBI | 0.5 | +247 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 846 | MLB | Chad Stevens 10 games | COL vs MIL@COL | RBI | 0.5 | +193 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 847 | MLB | Chase DeLauter 10 games | CLE vs CLE@TEX | R | 0.5 | +165 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 848 | MLB | Chase DeLauter 10 games | CLE vs CLE@TEX | RBI | 0.5 | +202 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 849 | MLB | Christian Yelich 10 games | MIL vs MIL@COL | RBI | 0.5 | +107 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 850 | MLB | CJ Abrams 10 games | WSH vs WSN@ARI | H | 1.5 | +260 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.