Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1001 | MLB | Kyle Stowers 10 games | MIA vs TBR@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1002 | MLB | Kyle Stowers 10 games | MIA vs TBR@MIA | R | 0.5 | +140 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1003 | MLB | Kyle Stowers 10 games | MIA vs TBR@MIA | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1004 | MLB | Kyle Tucker 10 games | LAD vs LAA@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1005 | MLB | Kyle Tucker 10 games | LAD vs LAA@LAD | R | 0.5 | +105 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1006 | MLB | Kyle Tucker 10 games | LAD vs LAA@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +161 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1007 | MLB | Leody Taveras 10 games | BAL vs BAL@TOR | R | 0.5 | +175 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1008 | MLB | Liam Hicks 10 games | MIA vs TBR@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1009 | MLB | Liam Hicks 10 games | MIA vs TBR@MIA | R | 1.5 | +800 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1010 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs LAA@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1011 | MLB | Luis Rengifo 10 games | MIL vs MIL@COL | H | 1.5 | +140 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1012 | MLB | Luis Rengifo 10 games | MIL vs MIL@COL | R | 0.5 | -125 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1013 | MLB | Luis Torrens 10 games | NYM vs NYM@SDP | HR | 0.5 | +1200 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1014 | MLB | Luke Keaschall 10 games | MIN vs KCR@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +230 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1015 | MLB | Maikel Garcia 10 games | KC vs KCR@MIN | R | 0.5 | +115 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1016 | MLB | Manny Machado 10 games | SD vs NYM@SDP | HR | 0.5 | +525 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1017 | MLB | Manny Machado 10 games | SD vs NYM@SDP | R | 0.5 | +135 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1018 | MLB | Manny Machado 10 games | SD vs NYM@SDP | RBI | 0.5 | +184 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +-0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1019 | MLB | Manny Machado 10 games | SD vs NYM@SDP | TB | 1.5 | +140 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +-0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1020 | MLB | Marcelo Mayer 10 games | BOS vs BOS@NYY | RBI | 0.5 | +292 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1021 | MLB | Mark Vientos 10 games | NYM vs NYM@SDP | R | 0.5 | +170 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1022 | MLB | Masataka Yoshida 10 games | BOS vs BOS@NYY | TB | 1.5 | +150 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1023 | MLB | Masyn Winn 10 games | STL vs CIN@STL | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1024 | MLB | Masyn Winn 10 games | STL vs CIN@STL | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1025 | MLB | Matt Chapman 10 games | SF vs SFG@CHC | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1026 | MLB | Matt McLain 10 games | CIN vs CIN@STL | HR | 0.5 | +800 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1027 | MLB | Matt McLain 10 games | CIN vs CIN@STL | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1028 | MLB | Matt Olson 10 games | ATL vs PIT@ATL | HR | 0.5 | +350 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1029 | MLB | Matt Vierling 10 games | DET vs SEA@DET | H | 1.5 | +380 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1030 | MLB | Matt Vierling 10 games | DET vs SEA@DET | RBI | 0.5 | +271 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1031 | MLB | Max Muncy 10 games | LAD vs LAA@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +160 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1032 | MLB | Michael Busch 10 games | CHC vs SFG@CHC | R | 0.5 | +135 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1033 | MLB | Miguel Andujar 10 games | SD vs NYM@SDP | TB | 1.5 | +140 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1034 | MLB | Miguel Vargas 10 games | CWS vs CHW@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1035 | MLB | MJ Melendez 10 games | NYM vs NYM@SDP | R | 0.5 | +180 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1036 | MLB | MJ Melendez 10 games | NYM vs NYM@SDP | RBI | 0.5 | +250 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1037 | MLB | Moisés Ballesteros 10 games | CHC vs SFG@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +257 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1038 | MLB | Moisés Ballesteros 10 games | CHC vs SFG@CHC | TB | 1.5 | +195 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1039 | MLB | Mookie Betts 10 games | LAD vs LAA@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +156 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1040 | MLB | Nathan Lukes 10 games | TOR vs BAL@TOR | HR | 0.5 | +800 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1041 | MLB | Nathan Lukes 10 games | TOR vs BAL@TOR | R | 1.5 | +900 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1042 | MLB | Nick Allen 10 games | HOU vs Athletics@ | R | 0.5 | +188 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1043 | MLB | Nick Fortes 10 games | TB vs TBR@MIA | R | 0.5 | +161 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1044 | MLB | Nick Fortes 10 games | TB vs TBR@MIA | RBI | 0.5 | +256 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1045 | MLB | Nick Gonzales 10 games | PIT vs PIT@ATL | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1046 | MLB | Nick Kurtz 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | HR | 0.5 | +325 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1047 | MLB | Nick Loftin 10 games | KC vs KCR@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1048 | MLB | Nick Loftin 10 games | KC vs KCR@MIN | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1049 | MLB | Nick Madrigal 7 games | LAA vs LAA@LAD | R | 0.5 | +220 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1050 | MLB | Nick Madrigal 7 games | LAA vs LAA@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +290 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.