Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 351 | MLB | Manny Machado 10 games | SD vs SDP@BAL | RBI | 0.5 | +146 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0.2 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 352 | MLB | Matt Olson 10 games | ATL vs ATL@NYM | R | 0.5 | +101 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | -0.3 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 353 | MLB | Michael Harris II 10 games | ATL vs ATL@NYM | H | 0.5 | -248 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 4/5 | -0.5 | 49 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 354 | MLB | Michael Harris II 10 games | ATL vs ATL@NYM | R | 0.5 | +102 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0.1 | 49 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 355 | MLB | Michael Massey 10 games | KC vs HOU@KCR | TB | 1.5 | +160 | 1.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0.2 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 356 | MLB | Mike Trout 10 games | LAA vs TBR@LAA | H | 0.5 | -175 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 4/5 | +0.5 | 49 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 357 | MLB | Mookie Betts 10 games | LAD vs LAD@CHW | H | 0.5 | -225 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 3/5 | +0.5 | 49 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 358 | MLB | Nick Kurtz 10 games | ATH vs COL@Athlet | HR | 0.5 | +180 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | -0.2 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 359 | MLB | Otto Lopez 10 games | MIA vs MIA@PIT | RBI | 0.5 | +250 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | -0.3 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 360 | MLB | Pete Alonso 10 games | BAL vs SDP@BAL | HR | 0.5 | +260 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0.3 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 361 | MLB | Royce Lewis 10 games | MIN vs STL@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +525 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0.4 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 362 | MLB | Sam Antonacci 10 games | CWS vs LAD@CHW | R | 0.5 | +130 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.1 | 49 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 363 | MLB | Spencer Arrighetti 10 games | HOU vs HOU@KCR | K | 3.5 | -425 | 4.6 | +1.1 | 3/5 | -1 | 49 | F | 7.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 364 | MLB | Spencer Horwitz 10 games | PIT vs MIA@PIT | R | 0.5 | +150 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | +0.2 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 365 | MLB | Spencer Steer 10 games | CIN vs ARI@CIN | R | 0.5 | +110 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +-0 | 49 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 366 | MLB | Spencer Torkelson 10 games | DET vs DET@CLE | R | 0.5 | +185 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +-0 | 49 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 367 | MLB | Taylor Walls 10 games | TB vs TBR@LAA | R | 0.5 | +150 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.1 | 49 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 368 | MLB | Tristan Peters 10 games | CWS vs LAD@CHW | R | 0.5 | +200 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0.4 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 369 | MLB | Tristan Peters 10 games | CWS vs LAD@CHW | RBI | 0.5 | +302 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | +0.3 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 370 | MLB | Troy Johnston 10 games | COL vs COL@Athlet | TB | 1.5 | +116 | 1.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0.3 | 49 | F | 6.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 371 | MLB | Tyler Freeman 10 games | COL vs COL@Athlet | H | 0.5 | -375 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 4/5 | -0.5 | 49 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 372 | MLB | Tyler Soderstrom 10 games | ATH vs COL@Athlet | RBI | 0.5 | -119 | 1.4 | +0.9 | 3/5 | -0.8 | 49 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 373 | MLB | Tyler Soderstrom 10 games | ATH vs COL@Athlet | TB | 1.5 | -155 | 3.2 | +1.7 | 3/5 | -1.3 | 49 | F | 6.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 374 | MLB | Vinnie Pasquantino 10 games | KC vs HOU@KCR | R | 0.5 | +125 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.4 | 49 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 375 | MLB | Vinnie Pasquantino 10 games | KC vs HOU@KCR | RBI | 0.5 | +140 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0.1 | 49 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 376 | MLB | Wyatt Langford 10 games | TEX vs TEX@BOS | H | 0.5 | -237 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 3/5 | +0.8 | 49 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 377 | MLB | Xavier Edwards 10 games | MIA vs MIA@PIT | RBI | 0.5 | +300 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | +0.3 | 49 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 378 | MLB | Yandy Diaz 10 games | TB vs TBR@LAA | H | 1.5 | +177 | 1.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0.4 | 49 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 379 | MLB | Zach McKinstry 10 games | DET vs DET@CLE | R | 0.5 | +200 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.3 | 49 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 380 | MLB | Zack Gelof 10 games | ATH vs COL@Athlet | HR | 0.5 | +375 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 381 | MLB | Zack Gelof 10 games | ATH vs COL@Athlet | RBI | 0.5 | +120 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | +0.2 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 382 | MLB | Adley Rutschman 10 games | BAL vs SDP@BAL | R | 0.5 | +100 | 1 | +0.5 | 2/5 | -0.4 | 48 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 383 | MLB | Andrew Vaughn 10 games | MIL vs PHI@MIL | RBI | 0.5 | +246 | 1 | +0.5 | 2/5 | -0.5 | 48 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 384 | MLB | Blaze Jordan 2 games | STL vs STL@MIN | R | 0.5 | +140 | 1 | +0.5 | 1/2 | +0 | 48 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 385 | MLB | Blaze Jordan 2 games | STL vs STL@MIN | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 2 | +0.5 | 1/2 | +0 | 48 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 386 | MLB | Brooks Lee 10 games | MIN vs STL@MIN | TB | 1.5 | +150 | 2.2 | +0.7 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 48 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 387 | MLB | Bryan Reynolds 10 games | PIT vs MIA@PIT | TB | 1.5 | +200 | 2.2 | +0.7 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 48 | F | 6.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 388 | MLB | Charles McAdoo 6 games | TOR vs NYY@TOR | H | 0.5 | -102 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.3 | 48 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 389 | MLB | Connor Norby 10 games | MIA vs MIA@PIT | H | 0.5 | -110 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0.3 | 48 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 390 | MLB | Denzer Guzman 4 games | LAA vs TBR@LAA | RBI | 0.5 | +210 | 1 | +0.5 | 2/4 | +0.3 | 48 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 391 | MLB | Jackson Holliday 10 games | BAL vs SDP@BAL | RBI | 0.5 | +200 | 1 | +0.5 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 48 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 392 | MLB | Jake Bauers 10 games | MIL vs PHI@MIL | H | 0.5 | -110 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | -0.2 | 48 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 393 | MLB | Jake Bauers 10 games | MIL vs PHI@MIL | RBI | 0.5 | +275 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 48 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 394 | MLB | Jared Triolo 10 games | PIT vs MIA@PIT | H | 0.5 | -140 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 4/5 | +-0 | 48 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 395 | MLB | Jorbit Vivas 10 games | WSH vs SEA@WSN | H | 0.5 | -139 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.3 | 48 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 396 | MLB | Kerry Carpenter 10 games | DET vs DET@CLE | H | 0.5 | -140 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 4/5 | -0.2 | 48 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 397 | MLB | Kyle Stowers 10 games | MIA vs MIA@PIT | H | 0.5 | -105 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | +-0 | 48 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 398 | MLB | Max Muncy 10 games | LAD vs LAD@CHW | RBI | 0.5 | +130 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 48 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 399 | MLB | Mike Trout 10 games | LAA vs TBR@LAA | R | 0.5 | -105 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | +0.1 | 48 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 400 | MLB | Mookie Betts 10 games | LAD vs LAD@CHW | R | 0.5 | +100 | 1 | +0.5 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 48 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.