Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 651 | MLB | Ryan Ward 10 games | LAD vs TBR@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +202 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 1/5 | -0.9 | 34 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 652 | MLB | Ryan Ward 10 games | LAD vs TBR@LAD | TB | 1.5 | +165 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | -0.8 | 34 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 653 | MLB | Spencer Horwitz 10 games | PIT vs PIT@Athlet | H | 1.5 | +180 | 1 | -0.5 | 2/5 | -0.8 | 34 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 654 | MLB | Tyler Callihan 9 games | PIT vs PIT@Athlet | RBI | 0.5 | +180 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 1/5 | -0.7 | 34 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 655 | MLB | Wade Meckler 10 games | LAA vs LAA@ARI | R | 0.5 | +130 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 1/5 | -0.7 | 34 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 656 | MLB | Zack Wheeler 8 games | PHI vs MIA@PHI | K | 7.5 | +210 | 6.2 | -1.3 | 2/5 | -0.5 | 34 | F | 9.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 657 | MLB | Brandon Marsh 10 games | PHI vs MIA@PHI | H | 0.5 | -233 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 2/5 | +0 | 33 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 658 | MLB | Carson Benge 10 games | NYM vs NYM@CIN | H | 0.5 | -164 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.4 | 33 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 659 | MLB | Jake Meyers 10 games | HOU vs DET@HOU | H | 0.5 | -165 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 33 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 660 | MLB | Jose Altuve 10 games | HOU vs DET@HOU | H | 0.5 | -190 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 33 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 661 | MLB | Lane Thomas 10 games | KC vs KCR@WSN | H | 0.5 | -190 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 33 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 662 | MLB | Max Muncy 10 games | LAD vs TBR@LAD | H | 0.5 | -180 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 33 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 663 | MLB | Nolan Schanuel 10 games | LAA vs LAA@ARI | H | 0.5 | -235 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 33 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 664 | MLB | Troy Melton 4 games | DET vs DET@HOU | K | 3.5 | -250 | 3.5 | +0 | 2/4 | +0.2 | 33 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 665 | MLB | A.J. Ewing 10 games | NYM vs NYM@CIN | H | 1.5 | +380 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 666 | MLB | A.J. Ewing 10 games | NYM vs NYM@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 667 | MLB | A.J. Ewing 10 games | NYM vs NYM@CIN | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 668 | MLB | A.J. Ewing 10 games | NYM vs NYM@CIN | RBI | 0.5 | +275 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 669 | MLB | Alec Bohm 10 games | PHI vs MIA@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 670 | MLB | Alec Bohm 10 games | PHI vs MIA@PHI | R | 0.5 | +155 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 671 | MLB | Alec Burleson 10 games | STL vs SDP@STL | R | 1.5 | +600 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 672 | MLB | Alec Burleson 10 games | STL vs SDP@STL | RBI | 1.5 | +450 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 673 | MLB | Alex Bregman 10 games | CHC vs COL@CHC | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 674 | MLB | Alex Bregman 10 games | CHC vs COL@CHC | R | 1.5 | +500 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 675 | MLB | Alex Bregman 10 games | CHC vs COL@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +155 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 676 | MLB | Alex Freeland 10 games | LAD vs TBR@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +325 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 677 | MLB | Alex Jackson 10 games | MIN vs MIN@TEX | H | 1.5 | +600 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 678 | MLB | Alex Jackson 10 games | MIN vs MIN@TEX | TB | 1.5 | +280 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 679 | MLB | Andy Pages 10 games | LAD vs TBR@LAD | H | 1.5 | +200 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 680 | MLB | Austin Martin 10 games | MIN vs MIN@TEX | R | 1.5 | +900 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 681 | MLB | Austin Slater 10 games | TB vs TBR@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +260 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 682 | MLB | Ben Williamson 10 games | TB vs TBR@LAD | H | 1.5 | +300 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +-0 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 683 | MLB | Ben Williamson 10 games | TB vs TBR@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 684 | MLB | Ben Williamson 10 games | TB vs TBR@LAD | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 685 | MLB | Blake Dunn 10 games | CIN vs NYM@CIN | R | 0.5 | +115 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 686 | MLB | Blaze Jordan 3 games | STL vs SDP@STL | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0.3 | -0.2 | 1/3 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 687 | MLB | Blaze Jordan 3 games | STL vs SDP@STL | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.7 | -0.8 | 1/3 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 688 | MLB | Blaze Jordan 3 games | STL vs SDP@STL | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 1.3 | -0.2 | 1/3 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 689 | MLB | Bobby Witt Jr. 10 games | KC vs KCR@WSN | R | 1.5 | +475 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.5 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 690 | MLB | Bobby Witt Jr. 10 games | KC vs KCR@WSN | RBI | 0.5 | +150 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 691 | MLB | Brandon Marsh 10 games | PHI vs MIA@PHI | H | 1.5 | +220 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 692 | MLB | Brandon Marsh 10 games | PHI vs MIA@PHI | R | 0.5 | +120 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +-0 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 693 | MLB | Brandon Nimmo 10 games | TEX vs MIN@TEX | R | 0.5 | +120 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 694 | MLB | Brandon Nimmo 10 games | TEX vs MIN@TEX | RBI | 1.5 | +475 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 695 | MLB | Braxton Fulford 10 games | COL vs COL@CHC | R | 1.5 | +2000 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 696 | MLB | Braxton Fulford 10 games | COL vs COL@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +275 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 697 | MLB | Brett Baty 10 games | NYM vs NYM@CIN | H | 1.5 | +475 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 698 | MLB | Brett Baty 10 games | NYM vs NYM@CIN | RBI | 0.5 | +278 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 699 | MLB | Brett Baty 10 games | NYM vs NYM@CIN | TB | 1.5 | +230 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 700 | MLB | Brooks Lee 10 games | MIN vs MIN@TEX | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.