Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 701 | MLB | Brooks Lee 10 games | MIN vs MIN@TEX | RBI | 0.5 | +244 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 702 | MLB | Brooks Lee 10 games | MIN vs MIN@TEX | TB | 1.5 | +155 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 703 | MLB | Bryan Reynolds 10 games | PIT vs PIT@Athlet | H | 1.5 | +220 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 704 | MLB | Bryan Reynolds 10 games | PIT vs PIT@Athlet | HR | 0.5 | +525 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 705 | MLB | Bryce Harper 10 games | PHI vs MIA@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +325 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 706 | MLB | Bryson Stott 10 games | PHI vs MIA@PHI | R | 0.5 | +150 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 707 | MLB | Bryson Stott 10 games | PHI vs MIA@PHI | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +-0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 708 | MLB | Byron Buxton 10 games | MIN vs MIN@TEX | RBI | 1.5 | +475 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 709 | MLB | Cam Smith 10 games | HOU vs DET@HOU | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 710 | MLB | Cam Smith 10 games | HOU vs DET@HOU | RBI | 0.5 | +230 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 711 | MLB | Carlos Cortes 10 games | ATH vs PIT@Athlet | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 712 | MLB | Carlos Cortes 10 games | ATH vs PIT@Athlet | TB | 1.5 | +140 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 713 | MLB | Carson Benge 10 games | NYM vs NYM@CIN | H | 1.5 | +300 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 714 | MLB | Carson Kelly 10 games | CHC vs COL@CHC | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 715 | MLB | Carson Kelly 10 games | CHC vs COL@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +195 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 716 | MLB | Carter Jensen 10 games | KC vs KCR@WSN | H | 1.5 | +400 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 717 | MLB | Carter Jensen 10 games | KC vs KCR@WSN | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 718 | MLB | Cedric Mullins 10 games | TB vs TBR@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 719 | MLB | Cedric Mullins 10 games | TB vs TBR@LAD | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 720 | MLB | Chandler Simpson 10 games | TB vs TBR@LAD | R | 0.5 | +185 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 721 | MLB | Chandler Simpson 10 games | TB vs TBR@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +260 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.5 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 722 | MLB | CJ Abrams 10 games | WSH vs KCR@WSN | R | 1.5 | +600 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 723 | MLB | Cole Carrigg 6 games | COL vs COL@CHC | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0.5 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 724 | MLB | Cole Carrigg 6 games | COL vs COL@CHC | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 725 | MLB | Colt Keith 10 games | DET vs DET@HOU | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 726 | MLB | Colt Keith 10 games | DET vs DET@HOU | R | 0.5 | +195 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 727 | MLB | Corbin Carroll 10 games | AZ vs LAA@ARI | H | 1.5 | +240 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 728 | MLB | Corbin Carroll 10 games | AZ vs LAA@ARI | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 729 | MLB | Corbin Carroll 10 games | AZ vs LAA@ARI | RBI | 0.5 | +160 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 730 | MLB | Corbin Carroll 10 games | AZ vs LAA@ARI | TB | 1.5 | +120 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 731 | MLB | Corey Seager 10 games | TEX vs MIN@TEX | R | 1.5 | +500 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 732 | MLB | Corey Seager 10 games | TEX vs MIN@TEX | RBI | 1.5 | +475 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 733 | MLB | Curtis Mead 10 games | WSH vs KCR@WSN | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 734 | MLB | Curtis Mead 10 games | WSH vs KCR@WSN | R | 0.5 | +110 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 735 | MLB | Curtis Mead 10 games | WSH vs KCR@WSN | RBI | 0.5 | +168 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 736 | MLB | Curtis Mead 10 games | WSH vs KCR@WSN | TB | 1.5 | +131 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 737 | MLB | Dane Myers 10 games | CIN vs NYM@CIN | H | 1.5 | +300 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 738 | MLB | Dane Myers 10 games | CIN vs NYM@CIN | R | 0.5 | +125 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 739 | MLB | Dane Myers 10 games | CIN vs NYM@CIN | TB | 1.5 | +160 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 740 | MLB | Denzer Guzman 5 games | LAA vs LAA@ARI | R | 0.5 | +170 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 741 | MLB | Denzer Guzman 5 games | LAA vs LAA@ARI | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 742 | MLB | Dillon Dingler 10 games | DET vs DET@HOU | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 743 | MLB | Dillon Dingler 10 games | DET vs DET@HOU | R | 1.5 | +800 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 744 | MLB | Donovan Walton 10 games | LAA vs LAA@ARI | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 745 | MLB | Donovan Walton 10 games | LAA vs LAA@ARI | R | 0.5 | +155 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 746 | MLB | Dylan Crews 10 games | WSH vs KCR@WSN | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 747 | MLB | Ezequiel Duran 10 games | TEX vs MIN@TEX | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 748 | MLB | Ezequiel Tovar 10 games | COL vs COL@CHC | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 749 | MLB | Fernando Tatis Jr. 10 games | SD vs SDP@STL | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 750 | MLB | Francisco Alvarez 10 games | NYM vs NYM@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.