Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 851 | MLB | Lane Thomas 10 games | KC vs KCR@WSN | H | 1.5 | +280 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 852 | MLB | Lane Thomas 10 games | KC vs KCR@WSN | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 853 | MLB | Lars Nootbaar 9 games | STL vs SDP@STL | H | 1.5 | +340 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 854 | MLB | Lars Nootbaar 9 games | STL vs SDP@STL | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 855 | MLB | Lawrence Butler 10 games | ATH vs PIT@Athlet | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 856 | MLB | Lawrence Butler 10 games | ATH vs PIT@Athlet | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 857 | MLB | Liam Hicks 10 games | MIA vs MIA@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 858 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs LAA@ARI | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 859 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs LAA@ARI | R | 0.5 | +155 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 860 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs LAA@ARI | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 861 | MLB | Lourdes Gurriel Jr. 10 games | AZ vs LAA@ARI | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 862 | MLB | Lourdes Gurriel Jr. 10 games | AZ vs LAA@ARI | R | 0.5 | +140 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 863 | MLB | LuJames Groover 7 games | AZ vs LAA@ARI | RBI | 0.5 | +218 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 864 | MLB | Luke Keaschall 10 games | MIN vs MIN@TEX | H | 1.5 | +360 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +-0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 865 | MLB | Luke Keaschall 10 games | MIN vs MIN@TEX | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 866 | MLB | Luke Keaschall 10 games | MIN vs MIN@TEX | RBI | 0.5 | +288 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 867 | MLB | Maikel Garcia 10 games | KC vs KCR@WSN | R | 1.5 | +900 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 868 | MLB | Manny Machado 10 games | SD vs SDP@STL | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 869 | MLB | Marcus Semien 10 games | NYM vs NYM@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 870 | MLB | Marcus Semien 10 games | NYM vs NYM@CIN | R | 0.5 | +175 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 871 | MLB | Marcus Semien 10 games | NYM vs NYM@CIN | RBI | 0.5 | +233 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 872 | MLB | Marcus Semien 10 games | NYM vs NYM@CIN | TB | 1.5 | +175 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 873 | MLB | Masyn Winn 10 games | STL vs SDP@STL | TB | 1.5 | +170 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 874 | MLB | Max Muncy 10 games | LAD vs TBR@LAD | H | 1.5 | +300 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 875 | MLB | Max Muncy 10 games | LAD vs TBR@LAD | R | 1.5 | +600 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 876 | MLB | Michael Busch 10 games | CHC vs COL@CHC | H | 1.5 | +230 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 877 | MLB | Michael Busch 10 games | CHC vs COL@CHC | HR | 0.5 | +325 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 878 | MLB | Mike Trout 10 games | LAA vs LAA@ARI | H | 1.5 | +220 | 1 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0.5 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 879 | MLB | Mike Trout 10 games | LAA vs LAA@ARI | HR | 0.5 | +325 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 880 | MLB | Mike Trout 10 games | LAA vs LAA@ARI | R | 1.5 | +450 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 881 | MLB | Mike Trout 10 games | LAA vs LAA@ARI | RBI | 0.5 | +150 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 882 | MLB | Mike Trout 10 games | LAA vs LAA@ARI | TB | 2.5 | +160 | 1.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 5.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 883 | MLB | MJ Melendez 10 games | NYM vs NYM@CIN | R | 0.5 | +210 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 884 | MLB | MJ Melendez 10 games | NYM vs NYM@CIN | TB | 1.5 | +260 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 885 | MLB | Moisés Ballesteros 10 games | CHC vs COL@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +175 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 886 | MLB | Moisés Ballesteros 10 games | CHC vs COL@CHC | TB | 1.5 | +145 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 887 | MLB | Mookie Betts 10 games | LAD vs TBR@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 888 | MLB | Mookie Betts 10 games | LAD vs TBR@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +160 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 889 | MLB | Nathan Church 10 games | STL vs SDP@STL | H | 1.5 | +400 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 890 | MLB | Nathaniel Lowe 10 games | CIN vs NYM@CIN | R | 0.5 | +165 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 891 | MLB | Nick Fortes 10 games | TB vs TBR@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +239 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 892 | MLB | Nick Kurtz 10 games | ATH vs PIT@Athlet | H | 1.5 | +230 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 893 | MLB | Nick Kurtz 10 games | ATH vs PIT@Athlet | RBI | 1.5 | +400 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 5.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 894 | MLB | Nick Loftin 10 games | KC vs KCR@WSN | H | 1.5 | +340 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 895 | MLB | Nick Madrigal 10 games | LAA vs LAA@ARI | RBI | 0.5 | +207 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 896 | MLB | Nick Madrigal 10 games | LAA vs LAA@ARI | TB | 1.5 | +143 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 897 | MLB | Nicky Lopez 10 games | TEX vs MIN@TEX | R | 0.5 | +190 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 898 | MLB | Nicky Lopez 10 games | TEX vs MIN@TEX | RBI | 0.5 | +311 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 899 | MLB | Nico Hoerner 10 games | CHC vs COL@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +229 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 900 | MLB | Nico Hoerner 10 games | CHC vs COL@CHC | TB | 1.5 | +140 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.