Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 701 | MLB | Kyle Higashioka 9 games | TEX vs MIN@TEX | R | 0.5 | +200 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 702 | MLB | Kyle Higashioka 9 games | TEX vs MIN@TEX | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 703 | MLB | Kyle Higashioka 9 games | TEX vs MIN@TEX | TB | 1.5 | +240 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 704 | MLB | Kyle Manzardo 10 games | CLE vs CLE@MIL | H | 1.5 | +380 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 705 | MLB | Kyle Manzardo 10 games | CLE vs CLE@MIL | R | 0.5 | +155 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 706 | MLB | Kyle Manzardo 10 games | CLE vs CLE@MIL | TB | 1.5 | +180 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +-0 | 32 | F | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 707 | MLB | Kyle Schwarber 10 games | PHI vs NYM@PHI | H | 1.5 | +280 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 708 | MLB | Kyle Schwarber 10 games | PHI vs NYM@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +220 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 709 | MLB | Kyle Schwarber 10 games | PHI vs NYM@PHI | RBI | 0.5 | +130 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 710 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs LAA@Athlet | HR | 0.5 | +525 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 711 | MLB | Luis Arraez 10 games | SF vs SFG@ATL | HR | 0.5 | +1600 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 712 | MLB | Luke Keaschall 10 games | MIN vs MIN@TEX | H | 1.5 | +340 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 713 | MLB | Luke Keaschall 10 games | MIN vs MIN@TEX | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 714 | MLB | Luke Keaschall 10 games | MIN vs MIN@TEX | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 715 | MLB | Luke Raley 10 games | SEA vs BAL@SEA | H | 0.5 | -123 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 716 | MLB | Luke Raley 10 games | SEA vs BAL@SEA | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 717 | MLB | Luke Raley 10 games | SEA vs BAL@SEA | TB | 1.5 | +180 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 718 | MLB | Maikel Garcia 10 games | KC vs STL@KCR | R | 0.5 | +125 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 719 | MLB | Marcelo Mayer 10 games | BOS vs TOR@BOS | R | 0.5 | +160 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 720 | MLB | Marcelo Mayer 10 games | BOS vs TOR@BOS | RBI | 0.5 | +230 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 721 | MLB | Marcus Semien 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | H | 1.5 | +280 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 722 | MLB | Marcus Semien 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +525 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 723 | MLB | Masataka Yoshida 10 games | BOS vs TOR@BOS | R | 0.5 | +135 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 724 | MLB | Masyn Winn 10 games | STL vs STL@KCR | H | 1.5 | +260 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 725 | MLB | Masyn Winn 10 games | STL vs STL@KCR | RBI | 0.5 | +233 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 726 | MLB | Masyn Winn 10 games | STL vs STL@KCR | TB | 1.5 | +141 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 727 | MLB | Matt Chapman 10 games | SF vs SFG@ATL | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 728 | MLB | Matt Chapman 10 games | SF vs SFG@ATL | R | 0.5 | +120 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 729 | MLB | Matt Olson 10 games | ATL vs SFG@ATL | H | 1.5 | +280 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 730 | MLB | Matt Olson 10 games | ATL vs SFG@ATL | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 731 | MLB | Matt Olson 10 games | ATL vs SFG@ATL | RBI | 0.5 | +182 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 732 | MLB | Michael Harris II 10 games | ATL vs SFG@ATL | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 733 | MLB | Michael Harris II 10 games | ATL vs SFG@ATL | RBI | 0.5 | +182 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 734 | MLB | Mickey Gasper 10 games | BOS vs TOR@BOS | R | 0.5 | +105 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 735 | MLB | Mickey Gasper 10 games | BOS vs TOR@BOS | RBI | 0.5 | +220 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 736 | MLB | Mickey Gasper 10 games | BOS vs TOR@BOS | TB | 1.5 | +143 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 737 | MLB | Miguel Vargas 10 games | CWS vs CHW@NYY | H | 1.5 | +230 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 738 | MLB | Miguel Vargas 10 games | CWS vs CHW@NYY | RBI | 0.5 | +145 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 739 | MLB | Mike Yastrzemski 10 games | ATL vs SFG@ATL | H | 0.5 | -122 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 740 | MLB | Mike Yastrzemski 10 games | ATL vs SFG@ATL | RBI | 0.5 | +263 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 741 | MLB | MJ Melendez 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 742 | MLB | Nathan Church 10 games | STL vs STL@KCR | H | 1.5 | +320 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 743 | MLB | Nathan Church 10 games | STL vs STL@KCR | RBI | 0.5 | +265 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 744 | MLB | Nathan Lukes 10 games | TOR vs TOR@BOS | R | 0.5 | +120 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 745 | MLB | Nathan Lukes 10 games | TOR vs TOR@BOS | RBI | 0.5 | +226 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 746 | MLB | Nick Kurtz 10 games | ATH vs LAA@Athlet | HR | 0.5 | +300 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +-0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 747 | MLB | Nick Madrigal 10 games | LAA vs LAA@Athlet | RBI | 0.5 | +232 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 748 | MLB | Nick Madrigal 10 games | LAA vs LAA@Athlet | TB | 1.5 | +150 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 749 | MLB | Oswald Peraza 10 games | LAA vs LAA@Athlet | R | 0.5 | +115 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 750 | MLB | Oswald Peraza 10 games | LAA vs LAA@Athlet | TB | 1.5 | +135 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.