Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 651 | MLB | Mike Yastrzemski 10 games | ATL vs MIL@ATL | H | 0.5 | +129 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 652 | MLB | Mitch Garver 10 games | SEA vs BOS@SEA | R | 0.5 | +180 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 653 | MLB | Mookie Betts 10 games | LAD vs BAL@LAD | H | 1.5 | +230 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.4 | 37 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 654 | MLB | Nathan Church 10 games | STL vs STL@KCR | R | 0.5 | +160 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 655 | MLB | Nathan Lukes 10 games | TOR vs TOR@CHC | R | 0.5 | +210 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 656 | MLB | Nathan Lukes 10 games | TOR vs TOR@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +282 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 657 | MLB | Nick Gonzales 10 games | PIT vs PIT@COL | H | 1.5 | +110 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | +-0 | 37 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 658 | MLB | Nick Kurtz 10 games | ATH vs LAA@Athlet | TB | 2.5 | +170 | 3 | +0.5 | 1/5 | -2.2 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 659 | MLB | Owen Caissie 10 games | MIA vs SFG@MIA | TB | 1.5 | +210 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | 7.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 660 | MLB | Ozzie Albies 10 games | ATL vs MIL@ATL | H | 1.5 | +400 | 1 | -0.5 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 37 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 661 | MLB | Patrick Bailey 10 games | CLE vs CLE@HOU | R | 0.5 | +190 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 662 | MLB | Patrick Bailey 10 games | CLE vs CLE@HOU | TB | 1.5 | +260 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0.5 | 37 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 663 | MLB | Pete Alonso 10 games | BAL vs BAL@LAD | R | 0.5 | +130 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.4 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 664 | MLB | Rafael Devers 10 games | SF vs SFG@MIA | RBI | 0.5 | +184 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 665 | MLB | Rhett Lowder 6 games | CIN vs CIN@NYY | K | 4.5 | +120 | 3.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 5.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 666 | MLB | Rhys Hoskins 10 games | CLE vs CLE@HOU | TB | 1.5 | +190 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 37 | F | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 667 | MLB | Richie Palacios 10 games | TB vs WSN@TBR | RBI | 0.5 | +244 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 668 | MLB | Royce Lewis 10 games | MIN vs MIN@ARI | H | 0.5 | -162 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | -0.9 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 669 | MLB | Ryan McMahon 10 games | NYY vs CIN@NYY | RBI | 0.5 | +193 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 670 | MLB | Sam Antonacci 10 games | CWS vs CHW@DET | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 671 | MLB | Sam Antonacci 10 games | CWS vs CHW@DET | RBI | 0.5 | +300 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 672 | MLB | Seth Lugo 10 games | KC vs STL@KCR | K | 4.5 | +118 | 4 | -0.5 | 2/5 | -0.5 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 673 | MLB | Shea Langeliers 10 games | ATH vs LAA@Athlet | RBI | 0.5 | +120 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 674 | MLB | Shohei Ohtani 10 games | LAD vs BAL@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +240 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 675 | MLB | Spencer Horwitz 10 games | PIT vs PIT@COL | RBI | 0.5 | +153 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 676 | MLB | Spencer Horwitz 10 games | PIT vs PIT@COL | TB | 1.5 | +112 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 677 | MLB | Spencer Jones 10 games | NYY vs CIN@NYY | TB | 1.5 | +180 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 678 | MLB | Spencer Steer 10 games | CIN vs CIN@NYY | R | 0.5 | +180 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 679 | MLB | Spencer Steer 10 games | CIN vs CIN@NYY | RBI | 0.5 | +289 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 680 | MLB | Spencer Torkelson 10 games | DET vs CHW@DET | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 681 | MLB | Spencer Torkelson 10 games | DET vs CHW@DET | RBI | 0.5 | +151 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 682 | MLB | Tatsuya Imai 5 games | HOU vs CLE@HOU | K | 4.5 | -150 | 4.2 | -0.3 | 3/5 | +0.5 | 37 | F | 11.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 683 | MLB | Taylor Walls 10 games | TB vs WSN@TBR | RBI | 0.5 | +290 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 684 | MLB | TJ Rumfield 10 games | COL vs PIT@COL | H | 1.5 | +200 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | -0.4 | 37 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 685 | MLB | TJ Rumfield 10 games | COL vs PIT@COL | HR | 0.5 | +525 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 686 | MLB | TJ Rumfield 10 games | COL vs PIT@COL | RBI | 1.5 | +400 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 37 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 687 | MLB | Trevor Larnach 10 games | MIN vs MIN@ARI | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.5 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 688 | MLB | Troy Johnston 10 games | COL vs PIT@COL | H | 1.5 | +230 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 689 | MLB | Tyler Freeman 10 games | COL vs PIT@COL | R | 1.5 | +700 | 1 | -0.5 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 690 | MLB | Tyler Soderstrom 10 games | ATH vs LAA@Athlet | H | 0.5 | -210 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | -0.7 | 37 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 691 | MLB | Tyler Soderstrom 10 games | ATH vs LAA@Athlet | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 692 | MLB | Tyler Stephenson 10 games | CIN vs CIN@NYY | H | 1.5 | +450 | 1 | -0.5 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 693 | MLB | Tyler Stephenson 10 games | CIN vs CIN@NYY | TB | 1.5 | +220 | 1 | -0.5 | 2/5 | -0.4 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 694 | MLB | Vaughn Grissom 10 games | LAA vs LAA@Athlet | RBI | 0.5 | +186 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 695 | MLB | Victor Mesa Jr. 10 games | TB vs WSN@TBR | H | 0.5 | -134 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 696 | MLB | Vladimir Guerrero Jr. 10 games | TOR vs TOR@CHC | R | 0.5 | +125 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 697 | MLB | Will Wagner 8 games | SD vs SDP@TEX | H | 0.5 | +111 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 37 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 698 | MLB | Willi Castro 10 games | COL vs PIT@COL | H | 1.5 | +230 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.5 | 37 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 699 | MLB | Willy Adames 10 games | SF vs SFG@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 700 | MLB | Willy Adames 10 games | SF vs SFG@MIA | RBI | 0.5 | +220 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.