Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 701 | MLB | Mookie Betts 10 games | LAD vs BAL@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +140 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 702 | MLB | Nathan Lukes 10 games | TOR vs TOR@CHC | R | 0.5 | +130 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 703 | MLB | Nathan Lukes 10 games | TOR vs TOR@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +185 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 704 | MLB | Nathaniel Lowe 10 games | CIN vs CIN@NYY | TB | 1.5 | +160 | 1 | -0.5 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 705 | MLB | Nick Gonzales 10 games | PIT vs PIT@COL | H | 1.5 | +130 | 1 | -0.5 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 706 | MLB | Nick Gonzales 10 games | PIT vs PIT@COL | RBI | 0.5 | +128 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.5 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 707 | MLB | Nico Hoerner 10 games | CHC vs TOR@CHC | R | 0.5 | +100 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.5 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 708 | MLB | Nolan Schanuel 10 games | LAA vs LAA@Athlet | R | 1.5 | +800 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 709 | MLB | Otto Lopez 10 games | MIA vs SFG@MIA | H | 0.5 | -300 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.6 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 710 | MLB | Owen Caissie 10 games | MIA vs SFG@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 711 | MLB | Owen Caissie 10 games | MIA vs SFG@MIA | R | 0.5 | +160 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 712 | MLB | Owen Caissie 10 games | MIA vs SFG@MIA | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 713 | MLB | Ozzie Albies 10 games | ATL vs MIL@ATL | R | 0.5 | +140 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 714 | MLB | Patrick Bailey 10 games | CLE vs CLE@HOU | H | 1.5 | +450 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 715 | MLB | Patrick Bailey 10 games | CLE vs CLE@HOU | R | 0.5 | +180 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 716 | MLB | Patrick Bailey 10 games | CLE vs CLE@HOU | TB | 1.5 | +230 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 717 | MLB | Paul Goldschmidt 10 games | NYY vs CIN@NYY | HR | 0.5 | +375 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 718 | MLB | Paul Goldschmidt 10 games | NYY vs CIN@NYY | RBI | 1.5 | +475 | 1 | -0.5 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 719 | MLB | Pavin Smith 10 games | AZ vs MIN@ARI | R | 0.5 | +138 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 720 | MLB | Pete Alonso 10 games | BAL vs BAL@LAD | R | 0.5 | +150 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 721 | MLB | Rafael Devers 10 games | SF vs SFG@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 722 | MLB | Rafael Devers 10 games | SF vs SFG@MIA | R | 0.5 | +135 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 723 | MLB | Randal Grichuk 10 games | CWS vs CHW@DET | R | 0.5 | +130 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 724 | MLB | Rhys Hoskins 10 games | CLE vs CLE@HOU | TB | 1.5 | +180 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 725 | MLB | Richie Palacios 10 games | TB vs WSN@TBR | R | 0.5 | +160 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 726 | MLB | Richie Palacios 10 games | TB vs WSN@TBR | RBI | 0.5 | +260 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 727 | MLB | Royce Lewis 10 games | MIN vs MIN@ARI | H | 0.5 | -200 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.5 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 728 | MLB | Sam Antonacci 10 games | CWS vs CHW@DET | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 729 | MLB | Sam Antonacci 10 games | CWS vs CHW@DET | RBI | 0.5 | +252 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 730 | MLB | Spencer Steer 10 games | CIN vs CIN@NYY | RBI | 0.5 | +223 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 731 | MLB | Spencer Torkelson 10 games | DET vs CHW@DET | R | 0.5 | +120 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 732 | MLB | TJ Rumfield 10 games | COL vs PIT@COL | H | 1.5 | +230 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 733 | MLB | TJ Rumfield 10 games | COL vs PIT@COL | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 734 | MLB | Tommy Troy 10 games | AZ vs MIN@ARI | R | 0.5 | +130 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 735 | MLB | Trevor Larnach 10 games | MIN vs MIN@ARI | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.5 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 736 | MLB | Trevor McDonald 8 games | SF vs SFG@MIA | K | 5.5 | +230 | 4.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | -0.5 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 737 | MLB | Tristan Peters 10 games | CWS vs CHW@DET | R | 0.5 | +180 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 738 | MLB | Troy Johnston 10 games | COL vs PIT@COL | H | 1.5 | +260 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 739 | MLB | Troy Melton 4 games | DET vs CHW@DET | K | 4.5 | +128 | 3.5 | -1 | 2/4 | +0.2 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 740 | MLB | Tyler Freeman 10 games | COL vs PIT@COL | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 741 | MLB | Tyler Stephenson 10 games | CIN vs CIN@NYY | H | 0.5 | -129 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 742 | MLB | Vaughn Grissom 10 games | LAA vs LAA@Athlet | RBI | 0.5 | +200 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 743 | MLB | Victor Caratini 10 games | MIN vs MIN@ARI | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 744 | MLB | Vladimir Guerrero Jr. 10 games | TOR vs TOR@CHC | R | 0.5 | +100 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 745 | MLB | Will Wagner 9 games | SD vs SDP@TEX | H | 0.5 | -126 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 746 | MLB | Willy Adames 10 games | SF vs SFG@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.5 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 747 | MLB | Willy Adames 10 games | SF vs SFG@MIA | RBI | 0.5 | +234 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.5 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 748 | MLB | Xavier Edwards 10 games | MIA vs SFG@MIA | RBI | 0.5 | +175 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 749 | MLB | Yainer Diaz 9 games | HOU vs CLE@HOU | R | 0.5 | +160 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 750 | MLB | Yandy Diaz 9 games | TB vs WSN@TBR | R | 0.5 | +100 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.