Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1751 | MLB | Chase Meidroth 10 games | CWS vs KCR@CHW | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1752 | MLB | Christian Walker 10 games | HOU vs HOU@DET | H | 1.5 | +280 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1753 | MLB | Christian Walker 10 games | HOU vs HOU@DET | R | 1.5 | +800 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1754 | MLB | Christian Walker 10 games | HOU vs HOU@DET | RBI | 1.5 | +500 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1755 | MLB | Coby Mayo 10 games | BAL vs WSN@BAL | H | 1.5 | +320 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1756 | MLB | Coby Mayo 10 games | BAL vs WSN@BAL | R | 1.5 | +800 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1757 | MLB | Coby Mayo 10 games | BAL vs WSN@BAL | RBI | 1.5 | +475 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1758 | MLB | Colby Thomas 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | H | 1.5 | +475 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1759 | MLB | Colby Thomas 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1760 | MLB | Colby Thomas 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1761 | MLB | Colby Thomas 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | TB | 1.5 | +210 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1762 | MLB | Cole Carrigg 10 games | COL vs COL@MIN | R | 1.5 | +900 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1763 | MLB | Cole Young 10 games | SEA vs SEA@CLE | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1764 | MLB | Cole Young 10 games | SEA vs SEA@CLE | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1765 | MLB | Colt Emerson 10 games | SEA vs SEA@CLE | H | 1.5 | +450 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1766 | MLB | Colt Emerson 10 games | SEA vs SEA@CLE | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1767 | MLB | Cooper Pratt 5 games | MIL vs CHC@MIL | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1768 | MLB | Cooper Pratt 5 games | MIL vs CHC@MIL | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1769 | MLB | Curtis Mead 10 games | WSH vs WSN@BAL | R | 1.5 | +800 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1770 | MLB | Dalton Rushing 10 games | LAD vs LAD@SDP | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1771 | MLB | Dalton Rushing 10 games | LAD vs LAD@SDP | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1772 | MLB | Daniel Schneemann 10 games | CLE vs SEA@CLE | H | 1.5 | +450 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1773 | MLB | Daniel Schneemann 10 games | CLE vs SEA@CLE | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1774 | MLB | Daulton Varsho 10 games | TOR vs TEX@TOR | H | 1.5 | +320 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1775 | MLB | Daulton Varsho 10 games | TOR vs TEX@TOR | R | 1.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1776 | MLB | Daylen Lile 10 games | WSH vs WSN@BAL | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1777 | MLB | Daylen Lile 10 games | WSH vs WSN@BAL | RBI | 0.5 | +179 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 26 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1778 | MLB | Dominic Canzone 10 games | SEA vs SEA@CLE | R | 1.5 | +900 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1779 | MLB | Dominic Canzone 10 games | SEA vs SEA@CLE | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1780 | MLB | Dominic Canzone 10 games | SEA vs SEA@CLE | TB | 1.5 | +140 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -2 | 26 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1781 | MLB | Dominic Smith 10 games | ATL vs ATL@SFG | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1782 | MLB | Dominic Smith 10 games | ATL vs ATL@SFG | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1783 | MLB | Drake Baldwin 10 games | ATL vs ATL@SFG | H | 1.5 | +260 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1784 | MLB | Drake Baldwin 10 games | ATL vs ATL@SFG | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1785 | MLB | Drake Baldwin 10 games | ATL vs ATL@SFG | TB | 1.5 | +140 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -1.8 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1786 | MLB | Drew Gilbert 10 games | SF vs ATL@SFG | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1787 | MLB | Edouard Julien 10 games | COL vs COL@MIN | H | 1.5 | +500 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1788 | MLB | Edouard Julien 10 games | COL vs COL@MIN | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1789 | MLB | Edouard Julien 10 games | COL vs COL@MIN | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1790 | MLB | Edouard Julien 10 games | COL vs COL@MIN | TB | 1.5 | +240 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1791 | MLB | Elly De La Cruz 10 games | CIN vs CIN@PIT | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1792 | MLB | Eric Haase 10 games | SF vs ATL@SFG | H | 1.5 | +500 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1793 | MLB | Eric Haase 10 games | SF vs ATL@SFG | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1794 | MLB | Eric Haase 10 games | SF vs ATL@SFG | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1795 | MLB | Eric Haase 10 games | SF vs ATL@SFG | TB | 1.5 | +260 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1796 | MLB | Ernie Clement 10 games | TOR vs TEX@TOR | H | 1.5 | +260 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1797 | MLB | Ernie Clement 10 games | TOR vs TEX@TOR | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1798 | MLB | Ernie Clement 10 games | TOR vs TEX@TOR | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1799 | MLB | Ezequiel Duran 10 games | TEX vs TEX@TOR | H | 1.5 | +400 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +-0 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1800 | MLB | Ezequiel Duran 10 games | TEX vs TEX@TOR | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.2 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.