Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1801 | MLB | Ezequiel Tovar 10 games | COL vs COL@MIN | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1802 | MLB | Ezequiel Tovar 10 games | COL vs COL@MIN | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1803 | MLB | Ezequiel Tovar 10 games | COL vs COL@MIN | TB | 1.5 | +160 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | -0.7 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1804 | MLB | Freddy Fermin 10 games | SD vs LAD@SDP | R | 1.5 | +2500 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1805 | MLB | Gabriel Moreno 10 games | AZ vs ARI@TBR | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1806 | MLB | Gabriel Rincones Jr. 6 games | PHI vs PHI@NYM | H | 1.5 | +475 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1807 | MLB | Gabriel Rincones Jr. 6 games | PHI vs PHI@NYM | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1808 | MLB | Garrett Mitchell 10 games | MIL vs CHC@MIL | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1809 | MLB | Gerrit Cole 5 games | NYY vs NYY@BOS | K | 6.5 | +240 | 4.8 | -1.7 | 1/5 | -0.8 | 26 | F | 5.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1810 | MLB | Graham Pauley 10 games | MIA vs MIA@STL | H | 1.5 | +475 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1811 | MLB | Graham Pauley 10 games | MIA vs MIA@STL | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1812 | MLB | Graham Pauley 10 games | MIA vs MIA@STL | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1813 | MLB | Graham Pauley 10 games | MIA vs MIA@STL | TB | 1.5 | +240 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1814 | MLB | Gunnar Henderson 10 games | BAL vs WSN@BAL | H | 1.5 | +230 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1815 | MLB | Gunnar Henderson 10 games | BAL vs WSN@BAL | R | 1.5 | +700 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1816 | MLB | Henry Bolte 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | R | 1.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1817 | MLB | Henry Bolte 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1818 | MLB | Hunter Feduccia 10 games | TB vs ARI@TBR | H | 1.5 | +500 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1819 | MLB | Hunter Feduccia 10 games | TB vs ARI@TBR | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1820 | MLB | Hunter Goodman 10 games | COL vs COL@MIN | R | 1.5 | +700 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1821 | MLB | Ian Happ 10 games | CHC vs CHC@MIL | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1822 | MLB | Ivan Herrera 10 games | STL vs MIA@STL | H | 1.5 | +230 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +-0 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1823 | MLB | Ivan Herrera 10 games | STL vs MIA@STL | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1824 | MLB | J.P. Crawford 10 games | SEA vs SEA@CLE | R | 1.5 | +700 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1825 | MLB | J.P. Crawford 10 games | SEA vs SEA@CLE | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1826 | MLB | Jackson Chourio 10 games | MIL vs CHC@MIL | H | 1.5 | +184 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1827 | MLB | Jackson Chourio 10 games | MIL vs CHC@MIL | R | 1.5 | +500 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1828 | MLB | Jackson Merrill 10 games | SD vs LAD@SDP | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1829 | MLB | Jacob Gonzalez 10 games | CWS vs KCR@CHW | H | 1.5 | +475 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1830 | MLB | Jacob Gonzalez 10 games | CWS vs KCR@CHW | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1831 | MLB | Jacob Gonzalez 10 games | CWS vs KCR@CHW | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1832 | MLB | Jacob Gonzalez 10 games | CWS vs KCR@CHW | TB | 1.5 | +230 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1833 | MLB | Jacob Young 10 games | WSH vs WSN@BAL | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1834 | MLB | Jacob Young 10 games | WSH vs WSN@BAL | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1835 | MLB | Jake Bauers 10 games | MIL vs CHC@MIL | H | 1.5 | +400 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1836 | MLB | Jake Bauers 10 games | MIL vs CHC@MIL | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1837 | MLB | Jake Bauers 10 games | MIL vs CHC@MIL | RBI | 0.5 | +180 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1838 | MLB | Jake Bennett 4 games | BOS vs NYY@BOS | K | 5.5 | +240 | 3.3 | -2.3 | 0/4 | +0.1 | 26 | F | 3.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1839 | MLB | Jake Burger 10 games | TEX vs TEX@TOR | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.3 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1840 | MLB | Jake Mangum 10 games | PIT vs CIN@PIT | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1841 | MLB | Jake Mangum 10 games | PIT vs CIN@PIT | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1842 | MLB | Jake McCarthy 10 games | COL vs COL@MIN | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1843 | MLB | Jake Meyers 10 games | HOU vs HOU@DET | H | 1.5 | +360 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1844 | MLB | Jake Meyers 10 games | HOU vs HOU@DET | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1845 | MLB | Jake Meyers 10 games | HOU vs HOU@DET | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1846 | MLB | Jake Rogers 10 games | DET vs HOU@DET | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1847 | MLB | Jake Rogers 10 games | DET vs HOU@DET | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1848 | MLB | Jakob Marsee 10 games | MIA vs MIA@STL | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.4 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1849 | MLB | James Outman 10 games | DET vs HOU@DET | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1850 | MLB | James Outman 10 games | DET vs HOU@DET | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.