Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1051 | MLB | Brandon Marsh 10 games | PHI vs PHI@DET | R | 0.5 | +125 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1052 | MLB | Brandon Marsh 10 games | PHI vs PHI@DET | RBI | 0.5 | +181 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1053 | MLB | Brandon Marsh 10 games | PHI vs PHI@DET | TB | 1.5 | +134 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -1 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1054 | MLB | Braxton Fulford 10 games | COL vs COL@SFG | R | 0.5 | +200 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1055 | MLB | Braxton Fulford 10 games | COL vs COL@SFG | RBI | 0.5 | +300 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1056 | MLB | Brett Baty 10 games | NYM vs BOS@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +800 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1057 | MLB | Brian Navarreto 5 games | MIA vs CLE@MIA | RBI | 0.5 | +273 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1058 | MLB | Brooks Lee 10 games | MIN vs LAA@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1059 | MLB | Bryce Harper 10 games | PHI vs PHI@DET | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1060 | MLB | Bryson Stott 10 games | PHI vs PHI@DET | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1061 | MLB | Bryson Stott 10 games | PHI vs PHI@DET | R | 0.5 | +150 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1062 | MLB | Cam Smith 10 games | HOU vs HOU@TEX | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1063 | MLB | Cam Smith 10 games | HOU vs HOU@TEX | RBI | 0.5 | +206 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1064 | MLB | Cam Smith 10 games | HOU vs HOU@TEX | TB | 1.5 | +155 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.8 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1065 | MLB | Carter Jensen 10 games | KC vs KCR@BAL | HR | 0.5 | +350 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1066 | MLB | Carter Jensen 10 games | KC vs KCR@BAL | TB | 1.5 | +120 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.8 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1067 | MLB | Cedric Mullins 10 games | TB vs SEA@TBR | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1068 | MLB | Chandler Simpson 10 games | TB vs SEA@TBR | HR | 0.5 | +1600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1069 | MLB | Chandler Simpson 10 games | TB vs SEA@TBR | RBI | 0.5 | +230 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1070 | MLB | Chase Meidroth 10 games | CWS vs Athletics@ | HR | 0.5 | +1200 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1071 | MLB | Chase Meidroth 10 games | CWS vs Athletics@ | RBI | 0.5 | +220 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1072 | MLB | Chase Meidroth 10 games | CWS vs Athletics@ | TB | 1.5 | +150 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1073 | MLB | Cody Bellinger 10 games | NYY vs NYY@WSN | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1074 | MLB | Cole Carrigg 10 games | COL vs COL@SFG | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1075 | MLB | Cole Carrigg 10 games | COL vs COL@SFG | RBI | 0.5 | +206 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -1 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1076 | MLB | Colt Emerson 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TBR | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1077 | MLB | Colt Emerson 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TBR | RBI | 0.5 | +277 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1078 | MLB | Colton Cowser 10 games | BAL vs KCR@BAL | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1079 | MLB | Colton Cowser 10 games | BAL vs KCR@BAL | RBI | 0.5 | +186 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1080 | MLB | Cooper Pratt 10 games | MIL vs MIL@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +1400 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1081 | MLB | Corbin Carroll 10 games | AZ vs ARI@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1082 | MLB | Dalton Rushing 10 games | LAD vs ARI@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1083 | MLB | Daniel Schneemann 10 games | CLE vs CLE@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +800 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1084 | MLB | Daniel Schneemann 10 games | CLE vs CLE@MIA | R | 0.5 | +165 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1085 | MLB | Dansby Swanson 10 games | CHC vs CHC@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +400 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1086 | MLB | Dansby Swanson 10 games | CHC vs CHC@CIN | RBI | 0.5 | +180 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.9 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1087 | MLB | Daulton Varsho 10 games | TOR vs TOR@SDP | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1088 | MLB | Daulton Varsho 10 games | TOR vs TOR@SDP | TB | 1.5 | +180 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1089 | MLB | Daylen Lile 10 games | WSH vs NYY@WSN | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1090 | MLB | Denzer Guzman 10 games | LAA vs LAA@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1091 | MLB | Denzer Guzman 10 games | LAA vs LAA@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +240 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1092 | MLB | Dillon Dingler 10 games | DET vs PHI@DET | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1093 | MLB | Dillon Dingler 10 games | DET vs PHI@DET | TB | 1.5 | +110 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1094 | MLB | Dominic Smith 10 games | ATL vs ATL@STL | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1095 | MLB | Dominic Smith 10 games | ATL vs ATL@STL | RBI | 0.5 | +224 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1096 | MLB | Dominic Smith 10 games | ATL vs ATL@STL | TB | 1.5 | +155 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +-0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1097 | MLB | Drew Cavanaugh 10 games | SF vs COL@SFG | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1098 | MLB | Drew Cavanaugh 10 games | SF vs COL@SFG | RBI | 0.5 | +250 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1099 | MLB | Drew Cavanaugh 10 games | SF vs COL@SFG | TB | 1.5 | +185 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1100 | MLB | Dylan Beavers 7 games | BAL vs KCR@BAL | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.