Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1251 | MLB | Tommy Edman 10 games | LAD vs ARI@LAD | TB | 1.5 | +120 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.8 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1252 | MLB | Travis Bazzana 10 games | CLE vs CLE@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1253 | MLB | Travis Bazzana 10 games | CLE vs CLE@MIA | RBI | 0.5 | +232 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1254 | MLB | Trea Turner 10 games | PHI vs PHI@DET | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1255 | MLB | Trea Turner 10 games | PHI vs PHI@DET | TB | 1.5 | +120 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.7 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1256 | MLB | Trent Grisham 10 games | NYY vs NYY@WSN | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1257 | MLB | Trevor Larnach 10 games | MIN vs LAA@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +215 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1258 | MLB | Troy Johnston 10 games | COL vs COL@SFG | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1259 | MLB | Troy Johnston 10 games | COL vs COL@SFG | R | 0.5 | +180 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1260 | MLB | Tsung-Che Cheng 7 games | BOS vs BOS@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1261 | MLB | Tyler Callihan 8 games | PIT vs MIL@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +800 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1262 | MLB | Tyler Freeman 10 games | COL vs COL@SFG | RBI | 0.5 | +250 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1263 | MLB | Tyler Soderstrom 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1264 | MLB | Tyler Soderstrom 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | RBI | 0.5 | +192 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1265 | MLB | Tyler Stephenson 10 games | CIN vs CHC@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1266 | MLB | Tyler Stephenson 10 games | CIN vs CHC@CIN | RBI | 0.5 | +200 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1267 | MLB | Victor Bericoto 10 games | SF vs COL@SFG | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1268 | MLB | Victor Caratini 10 games | MIN vs LAA@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1269 | MLB | Victor Robles 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TBR | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1270 | MLB | Vinnie Pasquantino 10 games | KC vs KCR@BAL | HR | 0.5 | +400 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1271 | MLB | Vinnie Pasquantino 10 games | KC vs KCR@BAL | TB | 1.5 | +122 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.8 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1272 | MLB | William Contreras 10 games | MIL vs MIL@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1273 | MLB | William Contreras 10 games | MIL vs MIL@PIT | R | 0.5 | +135 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1274 | MLB | Wilyer Abreu 10 games | BOS vs BOS@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1275 | MLB | Xander Bogaerts 10 games | SD vs TOR@SDP | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1276 | MLB | Xander Bogaerts 10 games | SD vs TOR@SDP | R | 0.5 | +140 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1277 | MLB | Xavier Edwards 10 games | MIA vs CLE@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +1200 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1278 | MLB | Yordan Alvarez 10 games | HOU vs HOU@TEX | H | 1.5 | +195 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.8 | 29 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1279 | MLB | Zach Neto 10 games | LAA vs LAA@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +189 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1280 | MLB | Zack Gelof 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1281 | MLB | Zack Gelof 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | RBI | 0.5 | +240 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1282 | MLB | Zack Gelof 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | TB | 1.5 | +165 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1283 | MLB | Alec Bohm 10 games | PHI vs PHI@DET | H | 0.5 | -220 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.4 | 28 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1284 | MLB | Andy Pages 10 games | LAD vs ARI@LAD | H | 0.5 | -248 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.5 | 28 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1285 | MLB | Carter Jensen 10 games | KC vs KCR@BAL | R | 0.5 | -110 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 28 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1286 | MLB | Christian Yelich 10 games | MIL vs MIL@PIT | H | 0.5 | -200 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 28 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1287 | MLB | Edwin Arroyo 10 games | CIN vs CHC@CIN | H | 0.5 | -160 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 28 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1288 | MLB | J.P. Crawford 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TBR | H | 0.5 | -190 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 28 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1289 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs LAA@MIN | H | 0.5 | -160 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 28 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1290 | MLB | Miguel Andujar 10 games | SD vs TOR@SDP | H | 0.5 | -165 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 28 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1291 | MLB | Paul Goldschmidt 10 games | NYY vs NYY@WSN | R | 0.5 | -110 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 28 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1292 | MLB | Samuel Basallo 10 games | BAL vs KCR@BAL | H | 0.5 | -190 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 28 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1293 | MLB | Xander Bogaerts 10 games | SD vs TOR@SDP | H | 0.5 | -200 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.4 | 28 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1294 | MLB | Brian Navarreto 5 games | MIA vs CLE@MIA | H | 0.5 | -132 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 27 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1295 | MLB | Eduardo Rodriguez 10 games | AZ vs ARI@LAD | K | 3.5 | -150 | 3.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -1.1 | 27 | F | 5.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1296 | MLB | Gavin Sheets 10 games | SD vs TOR@SDP | H | 0.5 | -145 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.7 | 27 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1297 | MLB | Myles Straw 10 games | TOR vs TOR@SDP | H | 0.5 | -124 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 27 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1298 | MLB | Troy Johnston 10 games | COL vs COL@SFG | H | 0.5 | -132 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 27 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1299 | MLB | Yordan Alvarez 10 games | HOU vs HOU@TEX | R | 0.5 | -135 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 27 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1300 | MLB | Andrew Benintendi 10 games | CWS vs Athletics@ | TB | 1.5 | +140 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.8 | 26 | F | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.