Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 901 | MLB | Kody Clemens 10 games | MIN vs LAA@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +350 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 902 | MLB | Kyle Manzardo 10 games | CLE vs CLE@MIA | R | 0.5 | +155 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 903 | MLB | Kyle Schwarber 10 games | PHI vs PHI@DET | R | 0.5 | -125 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 904 | MLB | Kyle Teel 10 games | CWS vs Athletics@ | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 905 | MLB | Kyle Teel 10 games | CWS vs Athletics@ | R | 0.5 | +120 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 906 | MLB | Kyle Tucker 10 games | LAD vs ARI@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +165 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 907 | MLB | Kyle Tucker 10 games | LAD vs ARI@LAD | TB | 1.5 | +135 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 908 | MLB | LaMonte Wade Jr. 7 games | HOU vs HOU@TEX | R | 0.5 | +155 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 909 | MLB | Lawrence Butler 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | R | 0.5 | +140 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 910 | MLB | Lourdes Gurriel Jr. 10 games | AZ vs ARI@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +230 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 911 | MLB | Luis Arraez 10 games | SF vs COL@SFG | R | 0.5 | +110 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 912 | MLB | Luis Campusano 6 games | SD vs TOR@SDP | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 913 | MLB | Luis Campusano 6 games | SD vs TOR@SDP | RBI | 0.5 | +279 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 914 | MLB | Luis Castillo 9 games | SEA vs SEA@TBR | K | 4.5 | +100 | 4.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 4.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 915 | MLB | Luke Keaschall 10 games | MIN vs LAA@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 916 | MLB | Luke Raley 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TBR | RBI | 0.5 | +212 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 917 | MLB | Masataka Yoshida 10 games | BOS vs BOS@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 918 | MLB | Masyn Winn 10 games | STL vs ATL@STL | R | 0.5 | +185 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 919 | MLB | Matt McLain 10 games | CIN vs CHC@CIN | R | 0.5 | +135 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 920 | MLB | Max Kepler 10 games | AZ vs ARI@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 921 | MLB | Max Muncy 10 games | LAD vs ARI@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +169 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 922 | MLB | Michael Busch 10 games | CHC vs CHC@CIN | RBI | 0.5 | +162 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 923 | MLB | Michael Conforto 10 games | CHC vs CHC@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +400 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 924 | MLB | Michael Conforto 10 games | CHC vs CHC@CIN | R | 0.5 | +155 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 925 | MLB | Michael Conforto 10 games | CHC vs CHC@CIN | RBI | 0.5 | +210 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 926 | MLB | Mickey Moniak 10 games | COL vs COL@SFG | RBI | 0.5 | +190 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 927 | MLB | Miguel Andujar 10 games | SD vs TOR@SDP | R | 0.5 | +175 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 928 | MLB | Miguel Andujar 10 games | SD vs TOR@SDP | RBI | 0.5 | +274 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 929 | MLB | Miguel Rojas 9 games | LAD vs ARI@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +266 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 930 | MLB | Miguel Vargas 10 games | CWS vs Athletics@ | RBI | 0.5 | +140 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 931 | MLB | Mike Yastrzemski 10 games | ATL vs ATL@STL | HR | 0.5 | +800 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 932 | MLB | Mookie Betts 10 games | LAD vs ARI@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +144 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 933 | MLB | Myles Straw 10 games | TOR vs TOR@SDP | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 934 | MLB | Myles Straw 10 games | TOR vs TOR@SDP | R | 0.5 | +210 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 935 | MLB | Nathan Lukes 10 games | TOR vs TOR@SDP | R | 0.5 | +200 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 936 | MLB | Nick Loftin 10 games | KC vs KCR@BAL | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 937 | MLB | Nicky Lopez 10 games | TEX vs HOU@TEX | TB | 1.5 | +300 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 938 | MLB | Nico Hoerner 10 games | CHC vs CHC@CIN | RBI | 0.5 | +237 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 939 | MLB | Nico Hoerner 10 games | CHC vs CHC@CIN | TB | 1.5 | +149 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 940 | MLB | Noelvi Marte 10 games | CIN vs CHC@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 941 | MLB | Nolan Schanuel 10 games | LAA vs LAA@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +205 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.5 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 942 | MLB | Oswald Peraza 10 games | LAA vs LAA@MIN | R | 0.5 | +180 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 943 | MLB | Oswald Peraza 10 games | LAA vs LAA@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +276 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 944 | MLB | Patrick Bailey 10 games | CLE vs CLE@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 945 | MLB | Patrick Bailey 10 games | CLE vs CLE@MIA | RBI | 0.5 | +293 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 946 | MLB | Pavin Smith 10 games | AZ vs ARI@LAD | R | 0.5 | +220 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 947 | MLB | Pavin Smith 10 games | AZ vs ARI@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +350 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 948 | MLB | Pete Alonso 10 games | BAL vs KCR@BAL | HR | 0.5 | +325 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 949 | MLB | Pete Crow-Armstrong 10 games | CHC vs CHC@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +325 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 950 | MLB | Rafael Devers 10 games | SF vs COL@SFG | HR | 0.5 | +400 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.