Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 651 | MLB | Daylen Lile 10 games | WSH vs NYY@WSN | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 652 | MLB | Denzer Guzman 10 games | LAA vs LAA@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 653 | MLB | Denzer Guzman 10 games | LAA vs LAA@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +245 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 654 | MLB | Dillon Dingler 10 games | DET vs PHI@DET | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 655 | MLB | Drake Baldwin 10 games | ATL vs ATL@STL | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 656 | MLB | Drew Cavanaugh 10 games | SF vs COL@SFG | RBI | 0.5 | +250 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 657 | MLB | Edwin Arroyo 10 games | CIN vs CHC@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 658 | MLB | Edwin Arroyo 10 games | CIN vs CHC@CIN | RBI | 0.5 | +253 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 659 | MLB | Elias Diaz 10 games | TEX vs HOU@TEX | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 660 | MLB | Elias Diaz 10 games | TEX vs HOU@TEX | RBI | 0.5 | +229 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 661 | MLB | Eric Haase 10 games | SF vs COL@SFG | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 662 | MLB | Eric Haase 10 games | SF vs COL@SFG | RBI | 0.5 | +205 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 663 | MLB | Ernie Clement 10 games | TOR vs TOR@SDP | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 664 | MLB | Evan Carter 10 games | TEX vs HOU@TEX | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 665 | MLB | Evan Carter 10 games | TEX vs HOU@TEX | RBI | 0.5 | +286 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 666 | MLB | Fernando Tatis Jr. 10 games | SD vs TOR@SDP | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 667 | MLB | Francisco Alvarez 10 games | NYM vs BOS@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +350 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 668 | MLB | Francisco Lindor 10 games | NYM vs BOS@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 669 | MLB | Francisco Lindor 10 games | NYM vs BOS@NYM | RBI | 0.5 | +194 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 670 | MLB | Freddie Freeman 10 games | LAD vs ARI@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +400 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 671 | MLB | Freddie Freeman 10 games | LAD vs ARI@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +145 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 672 | MLB | Gabriel Moreno 10 games | AZ vs ARI@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 673 | MLB | Gabriel Rincones Jr. 10 games | PHI vs PHI@DET | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 674 | MLB | Garrett Mitchell 10 games | MIL vs MIL@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +525 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 675 | MLB | Garrett Mitchell 10 games | MIL vs MIL@PIT | RBI | 0.5 | +180 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 676 | MLB | Gavin Sheets 10 games | SD vs TOR@SDP | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 677 | MLB | Gavin Sheets 10 games | SD vs TOR@SDP | RBI | 0.5 | +218 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 678 | MLB | Gunnar Henderson 10 games | BAL vs KCR@BAL | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 679 | MLB | Hunter Goodman 10 games | COL vs COL@SFG | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 680 | MLB | Ian Happ 10 games | CHC vs CHC@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +400 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 681 | MLB | Ian Happ 10 games | CHC vs CHC@CIN | RBI | 0.5 | +180 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 682 | MLB | Ildemaro Vargas 10 games | AZ vs ARI@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +1200 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 683 | MLB | Ildemaro Vargas 10 games | AZ vs ARI@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +322 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 684 | MLB | Ivan Herrera 10 games | STL vs ATL@STL | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 685 | MLB | Ivan Herrera 10 games | STL vs ATL@STL | RBI | 0.5 | +210 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 686 | MLB | J.P. Crawford 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TBR | HR | 0.5 | +800 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 687 | MLB | J.P. Crawford 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TBR | RBI | 0.5 | +296 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 688 | MLB | Jackson Chourio 10 games | MIL vs MIL@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 689 | MLB | Jackson Merrill 10 games | SD vs TOR@SDP | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 690 | MLB | Jacob Wilson 10 games | OAK vs ATHLETICS@ | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 691 | MLB | Jacob Wilson 10 games | OAK vs ATHLETICS@ | RBI | 0.5 | +216 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 692 | MLB | Jacob Young 10 games | WSH vs NYY@WSN | HR | 0.5 | +1500 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 693 | MLB | Jake McCarthy 10 games | COL vs COL@SFG | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 694 | MLB | Jakob Marsee 10 games | MIA vs CLE@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 695 | MLB | Jared Triolo 10 games | PIT vs MIL@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 696 | MLB | Jared Triolo 10 games | PIT vs MIL@PIT | RBI | 0.5 | +240 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 697 | MLB | Javier Sanoja 9 games | MIA vs CLE@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 698 | MLB | Javier Sanoja 9 games | MIA vs CLE@MIA | RBI | 0.5 | +257 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 699 | MLB | Jeff McNeil 10 games | OAK vs ATHLETICS@ | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 700 | MLB | Jeremy Pena 10 games | HOU vs HOU@TEX | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.