Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1151 | MLB | Kahlil Watson 10 games | CLE vs CLE@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1152 | MLB | Kahlil Watson 10 games | CLE vs CLE@MIA | RBI | 0.5 | +266 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1153 | MLB | Kahlil Watson 10 games | CLE vs CLE@MIA | TB | 1.5 | +175 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | +-0 | 29 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1154 | MLB | Ke'Bryan Hayes 6 games | CIN vs CHC@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +800 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1155 | MLB | Ke'Bryan Hayes 6 games | CIN vs CHC@CIN | RBI | 0.5 | +282 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1156 | MLB | Kerry Carpenter 10 games | DET vs PHI@DET | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1157 | MLB | Kerry Carpenter 10 games | DET vs PHI@DET | RBI | 0.5 | +218 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1158 | MLB | Ketel Marte 10 games | AZ vs ARI@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +280 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1159 | MLB | Ketel Marte 10 games | AZ vs ARI@LAD | R | 0.5 | -115 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1160 | MLB | Ketel Marte 10 games | AZ vs ARI@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +164 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1161 | MLB | Ketel Marte 10 games | AZ vs ARI@LAD | TB | 1.5 | +107 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1162 | MLB | Kody Clemens 10 games | MIN vs LAA@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +400 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1163 | MLB | Kyle Manzardo 10 games | CLE vs CLE@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1164 | MLB | Kyle Manzardo 10 games | CLE vs CLE@MIA | RBI | 0.5 | +165 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1165 | MLB | Kyle Stowers 10 games | MIA vs CLE@MIA | R | 0.5 | +135 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.8 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1166 | MLB | Kyle Teel 10 games | CWS vs Athletics@ | TB | 1.5 | +170 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.9 | 29 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1167 | MLB | Kyle Tucker 10 games | LAD vs ARI@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +525 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1168 | MLB | Liam Hicks 10 games | MIA vs CLE@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1169 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs LAA@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1170 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs LAA@MIN | R | 0.5 | +170 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1171 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs LAA@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +210 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1172 | MLB | Lourdes Gurriel Jr. 10 games | AZ vs ARI@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1173 | MLB | Lourdes Gurriel Jr. 10 games | AZ vs ARI@LAD | TB | 1.5 | +160 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1174 | MLB | Luis Arraez 10 games | SF vs COL@SFG | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1175 | MLB | Luke Keaschall 10 games | MIN vs LAA@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +1300 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1176 | MLB | Luke Keaschall 10 games | MIN vs LAA@MIN | R | 0.5 | +130 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.7 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1177 | MLB | Marcell Ozuna 10 games | PIT vs MIL@PIT | R | 0.5 | +140 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1178 | MLB | Marcell Ozuna 10 games | PIT vs MIL@PIT | RBI | 0.5 | +232 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1179 | MLB | Masyn Winn 10 games | STL vs ATL@STL | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1180 | MLB | Max Muncy 10 games | LAD vs ARI@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +375 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1181 | MLB | Michael Busch 10 games | CHC vs CHC@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +400 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1182 | MLB | Michael Harris II 10 games | ATL vs ATL@STL | H | 1.5 | +186 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.9 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1183 | MLB | Michael Harris II 10 games | ATL vs ATL@STL | HR | 0.5 | +525 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1184 | MLB | Michael Massey 10 games | KC vs KCR@BAL | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1185 | MLB | Mickey Moniak 10 games | COL vs COL@SFG | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1186 | MLB | Miguel Amaya 10 games | CHC vs CHC@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1187 | MLB | Mitch Bratt 1 games | AZ vs ARI@LAD | K | 3.5 | +115 | 3 | -0.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1188 | MLB | Mookie Betts 10 games | LAD vs ARI@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1189 | MLB | Mookie Betts 10 games | LAD vs ARI@LAD | R | 0.5 | -115 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1190 | MLB | Mookie Betts 10 games | LAD vs ARI@LAD | TB | 1.5 | +110 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1191 | MLB | Nate Eaton 10 games | BOS vs BOS@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1192 | MLB | Nate Eaton 10 games | BOS vs BOS@NYM | R | 0.5 | +160 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1193 | MLB | Nathan Church 10 games | STL vs ATL@STL | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1194 | MLB | Nathan Church 10 games | STL vs ATL@STL | R | 0.5 | +155 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1195 | MLB | Nathan Church 10 games | STL vs ATL@STL | RBI | 0.5 | +229 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1196 | MLB | Nathan Lukes 10 games | TOR vs TOR@SDP | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1197 | MLB | Nathan Lukes 10 games | TOR vs TOR@SDP | RBI | 0.5 | +253 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1198 | MLB | Nick Gonzales 10 games | PIT vs MIL@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1199 | MLB | Nick Gonzales 10 games | PIT vs MIL@PIT | RBI | 0.5 | +220 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1200 | MLB | Nicky Lopez 10 games | TEX vs HOU@TEX | HR | 0.5 | +1400 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.