Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1251 | MLB | William Contreras 10 games | MIL vs MIL@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +800 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1252 | MLB | Xavier Edwards 10 games | MIA vs CLE@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1253 | MLB | Xavier Edwards 10 games | MIA vs CLE@MIA | RBI | 0.5 | +217 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1254 | MLB | Zach Neto 10 games | LAA vs LAA@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +375 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1255 | MLB | Zach Neto 10 games | LAA vs LAA@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +190 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1256 | MLB | Zack Short 10 games | NYM vs BOS@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1257 | MLB | Zack Short 10 games | NYM vs BOS@NYM | RBI | 0.5 | +421 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1258 | MLB | Braden Montgomery 10 games | CWS vs Athletics@ | H | 0.5 | -164 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 28 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1259 | MLB | Christian Yelich 10 games | MIL vs MIL@PIT | H | 0.5 | -190 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 28 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1260 | MLB | Colt Keith 10 games | DET vs PHI@DET | H | 0.5 | -156 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.4 | 28 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1261 | MLB | Francisco Lindor 10 games | NYM vs BOS@NYM | H | 0.5 | -180 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +-0 | 28 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1262 | MLB | Jazz Chisholm Jr. 10 games | NYY vs NYY@WSN | H | 0.5 | -180 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 28 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1263 | MLB | Josh Lowe 10 games | LAA vs LAA@MIN | H | 0.5 | -160 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.4 | 28 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1264 | MLB | Kyle Tucker 10 games | LAD vs ARI@LAD | R | 0.5 | -110 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 28 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1265 | MLB | Matthew Boyd 3 games | CHC vs CHC@CIN | K | 5.5 | -108 | 4.3 | -1.2 | 1/3 | +0 | 28 | F | 3.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1266 | MLB | Miguel Vargas 10 games | CWS vs Athletics@ | H | 0.5 | -180 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 28 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1267 | MLB | Nico Hoerner 10 games | CHC vs CHC@CIN | H | 0.5 | -235 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 28 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1268 | MLB | Shea Langeliers 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | H | 0.5 | -235 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 28 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1269 | MLB | Shea Langeliers 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | R | 0.5 | -105 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 28 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1270 | MLB | Tyler Soderstrom 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | H | 0.5 | -190 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.4 | 28 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1271 | MLB | Willy Adames 10 games | SF vs COL@SFG | H | 0.5 | -180 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 28 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1272 | MLB | Xander Bogaerts 10 games | SD vs TOR@SDP | H | 0.5 | -190 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 28 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1273 | MLB | Dalton Rushing 10 games | LAD vs ARI@LAD | H | 0.5 | -150 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 1/5 | -0.9 | 27 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1274 | MLB | Edouard Julien 10 games | COL vs COL@SFG | H | 0.5 | -124 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 27 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1275 | MLB | Evan Carter 10 games | TEX vs HOU@TEX | H | 0.5 | -125 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +-0 | 27 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1276 | MLB | Jared Triolo 10 games | PIT vs MIL@PIT | H | 0.5 | -150 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.6 | 27 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1277 | MLB | Kahlil Watson 10 games | CLE vs CLE@MIA | H | 0.5 | -131 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 27 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1278 | MLB | Braden Montgomery 10 games | CWS vs Athletics@ | TB | 1.5 | +180 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 5.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1279 | MLB | Christian Yelich 10 games | MIL vs MIL@PIT | TB | 1.5 | +150 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1280 | MLB | Cole Carrigg 10 games | COL vs COL@SFG | TB | 1.5 | +145 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1281 | MLB | Colson Montgomery 10 games | CWS vs Athletics@ | RBI | 0.5 | +184 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1282 | MLB | Colton Cowser 10 games | BAL vs KCR@BAL | TB | 1.5 | +160 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1283 | MLB | Corbin Carroll 10 games | AZ vs ARI@LAD | TB | 1.5 | +127 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1284 | MLB | Dansby Swanson 10 games | CHC vs CHC@CIN | TB | 1.5 | +136 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -2 | 26 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1285 | MLB | Dillon Dingler 10 games | DET vs PHI@DET | TB | 1.5 | +140 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.7 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1286 | MLB | Ezequiel Tovar 10 games | COL vs COL@SFG | TB | 1.5 | +195 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1287 | MLB | Francisco Lindor 10 games | NYM vs BOS@NYM | TB | 1.5 | +137 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 6.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1288 | MLB | Heliot Ramos 10 games | SF vs COL@SFG | RBI | 0.5 | +204 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.7 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1289 | MLB | Heliot Ramos 10 games | SF vs COL@SFG | TB | 1.5 | +113 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -2 | 26 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1290 | MLB | Henry Davis 10 games | PIT vs MIL@PIT | TB | 1.5 | +190 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -1.1 | 26 | F | 5.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1291 | MLB | Joey Meneses 8 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | TB | 1.5 | +155 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1292 | MLB | Josh Bell 10 games | MIN vs LAA@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +156 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.7 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1293 | MLB | Jung Hoo Lee 10 games | SF vs COL@SFG | H | 1.5 | +190 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1294 | MLB | Kyle Manzardo 10 games | CLE vs CLE@MIA | TB | 1.5 | +160 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1295 | MLB | Kyle Stowers 10 games | MIA vs CLE@MIA | TB | 1.5 | +145 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -2.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1296 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs LAA@MIN | TB | 1.5 | +175 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1297 | MLB | Masyn Winn 10 games | STL vs ATL@STL | RBI | 0.5 | +225 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1298 | MLB | Masyn Winn 10 games | STL vs ATL@STL | TB | 1.5 | +160 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | -1.3 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1299 | MLB | Michael Harris II 10 games | ATL vs ATL@STL | RBI | 0.5 | +197 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.9 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1300 | MLB | Shea Langeliers 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | H | 1.5 | +196 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.