Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1151 | MLB | Kevin McGonigle 10 games | DET vs DET@LAA | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1152 | MLB | Kevin McGonigle 10 games | DET vs DET@LAA | RBI | 0.5 | +185 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1153 | MLB | Kyle Manzardo 10 games | CLE vs PIT@CLE | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1154 | MLB | Kyle Stowers 10 games | MIA vs MIA@MIL | HR | 0.5 | +375 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1155 | MLB | Kyle Teel 10 games | CWS vs CHW@TOR | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1156 | MLB | Kyle Tucker 10 games | LAD vs LAD@NYY | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1157 | MLB | Kyle Tucker 10 games | LAD vs LAD@NYY | R | 0.5 | +160 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1158 | MLB | Liam Hicks 10 games | MIA vs MIA@MIL | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1159 | MLB | Liam Hicks 10 games | MIA vs MIA@MIL | TB | 1.5 | +185 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1160 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs DET@LAA | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1161 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs DET@LAA | R | 0.5 | +165 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1162 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs DET@LAA | RBI | 0.5 | +251 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1163 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs DET@LAA | TB | 1.5 | +175 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1164 | MLB | Lucas Spence 2 games | HOU vs BAL@HOU | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/2 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1165 | MLB | Lucas Spence 2 games | HOU vs BAL@HOU | RBI | 0.5 | +256 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/2 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1166 | MLB | Luis Arraez 10 games | SF vs SFG@SEA | H | 1.5 | +175 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1167 | MLB | Luis Arraez 10 games | SF vs SFG@SEA | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1168 | MLB | Luis Arraez 10 games | SF vs SFG@SEA | RBI | 0.5 | +289 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1169 | MLB | Luis Arraez 10 games | SF vs SFG@SEA | TB | 1.5 | +130 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.7 | 29 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1170 | MLB | Luis Lara 6 games | MIL vs MIA@MIL | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1171 | MLB | Luis Lara 6 games | MIL vs MIA@MIL | R | 0.5 | +140 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1172 | MLB | Luis Lara 6 games | MIL vs MIA@MIL | RBI | 0.5 | +241 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1173 | MLB | Luis Lara 6 games | MIL vs MIA@MIL | TB | 1.5 | +210 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1174 | MLB | Luis Rengifo 10 games | SD vs SDP@KCR | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1175 | MLB | Luis Rengifo 10 games | SD vs SDP@KCR | RBI | 0.5 | +217 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1176 | MLB | Luis Rengifo 10 games | SD vs SDP@KCR | TB | 1.5 | +155 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 29 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1177 | MLB | Luke Keaschall 10 games | MIN vs MIN@CHC | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1178 | MLB | Manny Machado 10 games | SD vs SDP@KCR | HR | 0.5 | +325 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1179 | MLB | Marcus Semien 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1180 | MLB | Marcus Semien 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | RBI | 0.5 | +221 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1181 | MLB | Masyn Winn 10 games | STL vs STL@ARI | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1182 | MLB | Masyn Winn 10 games | STL vs STL@ARI | R | 0.5 | +150 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1183 | MLB | Masyn Winn 10 games | STL vs STL@ARI | TB | 1.5 | +149 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1184 | MLB | Matt Vierling 10 games | DET vs DET@LAA | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1185 | MLB | Matt Vierling 10 games | DET vs DET@LAA | RBI | 0.5 | +210 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1186 | MLB | Max Kepler 10 games | AZ vs STL@ARI | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1187 | MLB | Max Schuemann 10 games | NYY vs LAD@NYY | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1188 | MLB | Max Schuemann 10 games | NYY vs LAD@NYY | RBI | 0.5 | +260 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1189 | MLB | Michael Conforto 10 games | CHC vs MIN@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +231 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1190 | MLB | Michael Conforto 10 games | CHC vs MIN@CHC | TB | 1.5 | +180 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -1.5 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1191 | MLB | Michael Massey 10 games | KC vs SDP@KCR | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1192 | MLB | Mickey Moniak 10 games | COL vs CIN@COL | HR | 0.5 | +325 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1193 | MLB | Miguel Andujar 10 games | SD vs SDP@KCR | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1194 | MLB | Mike Trout 10 games | LAA vs DET@LAA | HR | 0.5 | +300 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1195 | MLB | Mitch Garver 10 games | SEA vs SFG@SEA | TB | 1.5 | +175 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.7 | 29 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1196 | MLB | Mookie Betts 10 games | LAD vs LAD@NYY | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1197 | MLB | Mookie Betts 10 games | LAD vs LAD@NYY | TB | 1.5 | +150 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1198 | MLB | Munetaka Murakami 10 games | CWS vs CHW@TOR | HR | 0.5 | +300 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1199 | MLB | Munetaka Murakami 10 games | CWS vs CHW@TOR | RBI | 0.5 | +173 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1200 | MLB | Munetaka Murakami 10 games | CWS vs CHW@TOR | TB | 1.5 | +140 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.