Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1301 | MLB | Dalton Rushing 10 games | LAD vs LAD@NYY | R | 0.5 | +165 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1302 | MLB | Daniel Susac 10 games | SF vs SFG@SEA | TB | 1.5 | +275 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1303 | MLB | Daulton Varsho 10 games | TOR vs CHW@TOR | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1304 | MLB | Dominic Smith 10 games | ATL vs TEX@ATL | TB | 1.5 | +160 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1305 | MLB | Dylan Crews 10 games | WSH vs WSN@Athlet | H | 1.5 | +195 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1306 | MLB | Esteury Ruiz 10 games | MIA vs MIA@MIL | TB | 1.5 | +190 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1307 | MLB | Gabriel Rincones Jr. 10 games | PHI vs NYM@PHI | TB | 1.5 | +250 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | -1.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1308 | MLB | Hunter Goodman 10 games | COL vs CIN@COL | R | 0.5 | -120 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1309 | MLB | Ivan Herrera 10 games | STL vs STL@ARI | H | 1.5 | +190 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1310 | MLB | Ivan Herrera 10 games | STL vs STL@ARI | TB | 1.5 | +121 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1311 | MLB | Jackson Holliday 10 games | BAL vs BAL@HOU | TB | 1.5 | +250 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1312 | MLB | Jase Bowen 10 games | SD vs SDP@KCR | TB | 1.5 | +185 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1313 | MLB | Jo Adell 10 games | LAA vs DET@LAA | RBI | 0.5 | +196 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.8 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1314 | MLB | Jonah Heim 10 games | ATH vs WSN@Athlet | TB | 1.5 | +135 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.7 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1315 | MLB | Jordan Walker 10 games | STL vs STL@ARI | TB | 1.5 | +100 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 0/5 | -0.7 | 26 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1316 | MLB | Jorge Polanco 6 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | TB | 1.5 | +140 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1317 | MLB | Juan Soto 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | H | 1.5 | +195 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1318 | MLB | Juan Soto 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | RBI | 0.5 | +145 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.8 | 26 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1319 | MLB | Ke'Bryan Hayes 3 games | CIN vs CIN@COL | TB | 1.5 | +140 | 0.3 | -1.2 | 0/3 | +0 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1320 | MLB | Kerry Carpenter 10 games | DET vs DET@LAA | TB | 1.5 | +130 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1321 | MLB | Kyle Manzardo 10 games | CLE vs PIT@CLE | TB | 1.5 | +185 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.4 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1322 | MLB | Kyle Stowers 10 games | MIA vs MIA@MIL | R | 0.5 | +130 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1323 | MLB | Kyle Stowers 10 games | MIA vs MIA@MIL | RBI | 0.5 | +180 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.8 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1324 | MLB | Marcus Semien 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | TB | 1.5 | +185 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1325 | MLB | Miguel Vargas 10 games | CWS vs CHW@TOR | RBI | 1.5 | +475 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1326 | MLB | Mike Trout 10 games | LAA vs DET@LAA | RBI | 0.5 | +186 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.7 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1327 | MLB | Munetaka Murakami 10 games | CWS vs CHW@TOR | RBI | 1.5 | +450 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1328 | MLB | Nathan Church 10 games | STL vs STL@ARI | TB | 1.5 | +185 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1329 | MLB | Nathan Lukes 10 games | TOR vs CHW@TOR | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1330 | MLB | Noelvi Marte 10 games | CIN vs CIN@COL | H | 1.5 | +180 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +-0 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1331 | MLB | Noelvi Marte 10 games | CIN vs CIN@COL | RBI | 0.5 | +156 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.7 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1332 | MLB | Paul Skenes 10 games | PIT vs PIT@CLE | K | 7.5 | +116 | 6.2 | -1.3 | 1/5 | -1.4 | 26 | F | 8.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1333 | MLB | Rece Hinds 1 games | MIA vs MIA@MIL | TB | 1.5 | +275 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1334 | MLB | Riley Greene 10 games | DET vs DET@LAA | H | 1.5 | +218 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1335 | MLB | Ryan Kreidler 10 games | MIN vs MIN@CHC | TB | 1.5 | +225 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.2 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1336 | MLB | Sal Stewart 10 games | CIN vs CIN@COL | H | 1.5 | +130 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1337 | MLB | Taylor Walls 10 games | TB vs TBR@BOS | TB | 1.5 | +220 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1338 | MLB | Trey Yesavage 10 games | TOR vs CHW@TOR | K | 5.5 | -130 | 4.4 | -1.1 | 2/5 | -1.1 | 26 | F | 9.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1339 | MLB | Tristan Peters 10 games | CWS vs CHW@TOR | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1340 | MLB | Carson Benge 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | H | 0.5 | -200 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.7 | 25 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1341 | MLB | Carson Kelly 10 games | CHC vs MIN@CHC | H | 0.5 | -141 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +-0 | 25 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1342 | MLB | Eduardo Rodriguez 10 games | NL vs STL@ARI | K | 3.5 | -155 | 2.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | -0.9 | 25 | F | 3.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1343 | MLB | Kody Clemens 10 games | MIN vs MIN@CHC | H | 0.5 | -140 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 25 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1344 | MLB | Marcus Semien 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | H | 0.5 | -150 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 25 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1345 | MLB | Pete Crow-Armstrong 10 games | CHC vs MIN@CHC | H | 0.5 | -215 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.6 | 25 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1346 | MLB | Bobby Witt Jr. 10 games | KC vs SDP@KCR | TB | 1.5 | -135 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -1.3 | 24 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1347 | MLB | Alika Williams 10 games | ATH vs WSN@Athlet | TB | 1.5 | +190 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -1 | 23 | F | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1348 | MLB | Austin Martin 10 games | MIN vs MIN@CHC | H | 0.5 | -168 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 23 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1349 | MLB | Bo Bichette 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | H | 1.5 | +183 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.8 | 23 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1350 | MLB | Bo Bichette 10 games | NYM vs NYM@PHI | TB | 1.5 | +110 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.9 | 23 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.