Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 701 | MLB | James Jarvis 10 games | vs SDP@ATL | TB | 1.5 | +175 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | -1.3 | 34 | F | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 702 | MLB | Jonatan Clase 9 games | TOR vs TBR@TOR | TB | 1.5 | +275 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | -1.3 | 34 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 703 | MLB | Kyle Karros 10 games | COL vs WSN@COL | R | 0.5 | -115 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 34 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 704 | MLB | Michael Lorenzen 10 games | COL vs WSN@COL | K | 3.5 | +102 | 2.6 | -0.9 | 2/5 | -1.4 | 34 | F | 5.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 705 | MLB | Pete Alonso 10 games | BAL vs BAL@BOS | RBI | 0.5 | +180 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.6 | 34 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 706 | MLB | Rafael Devers 10 games | SF vs SFG@KCR | R | 0.5 | -115 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 34 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 707 | MLB | Sal Stewart 10 games | CIN vs CIN@SEA | TB | 1.5 | +130 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | -0.6 | 34 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 708 | MLB | Taylor Ward 10 games | BAL vs BAL@BOS | TB | 1.5 | +142 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | -0.7 | 34 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 709 | MLB | TJ Rumfield 10 games | COL vs WSN@COL | R | 0.5 | -115 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.5 | 34 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 710 | MLB | Will Warren 9 games | NYY vs PIT@NYY | K | 5.5 | +100 | 4 | -1.5 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 34 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 711 | MLB | Andy Pages 10 games | LAD vs LAD@PHI | H | 0.5 | -185 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 33 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 712 | MLB | Carson Kelly 10 games | CHC vs DET@CHC | H | 0.5 | -175 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 33 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 713 | MLB | Geraldo Perdomo 10 games | AZ vs Athletics@ | H | 0.5 | -220 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 33 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 714 | MLB | Jose Tena 10 games | WSH vs WSN@COL | H | 0.5 | -242 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.5 | 33 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 715 | MLB | Matt Olson 10 games | ATL vs SDP@ATL | H | 0.5 | -200 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 2/5 | +-0 | 33 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 716 | MLB | Ozzie Albies 10 games | ATL vs SDP@ATL | H | 0.5 | -250 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 2/5 | +-0 | 33 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 717 | MLB | Spencer Torkelson 10 games | DET vs DET@CHC | H | 0.5 | -180 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 33 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 718 | MLB | Vladimir Guerrero Jr. 10 games | TOR vs TBR@TOR | H | 0.5 | -235 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 33 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 719 | MLB | A.J. Ewing 10 games | NYM vs NYM@MIL | RBI | 0.5 | +279 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 720 | MLB | Adrian Del Castillo 10 games | AZ vs Athletics@ | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 721 | MLB | Alec Bohm 10 games | PHI vs LAD@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 722 | MLB | Alejandro Kirk 10 games | TOR vs TBR@TOR | RBI | 0.5 | +260 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 723 | MLB | Alika Williams 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | R | 0.5 | +165 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 724 | MLB | Alika Williams 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | TB | 1.5 | +200 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 725 | MLB | Andrew Vaughn 10 games | MIL vs NYM@MIL | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 726 | MLB | Andrew Vaughn 10 games | MIL vs NYM@MIL | R | 0.5 | +115 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 727 | MLB | Andrew Vaughn 10 games | MIL vs NYM@MIL | RBI | 0.5 | +177 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 728 | MLB | Andy Pages 10 games | LAD vs LAD@PHI | RBI | 0.5 | +232 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 729 | MLB | Andy Pages 10 games | LAD vs LAD@PHI | TB | 1.5 | +145 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 730 | MLB | Austin Hedges 10 games | CLE vs MIN@CLE | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 731 | MLB | Austin Wells 10 games | NYY vs PIT@NYY | RBI | 0.5 | +230 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 732 | MLB | Ben Malgeri 10 games | DET vs DET@CHC | R | 0.5 | +180 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 733 | MLB | Ben Malgeri 10 games | DET vs DET@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +246 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 734 | MLB | Braden Montgomery 10 games | CWS vs CHW@TEX | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 735 | MLB | Brandon Lowe 10 games | PIT vs PIT@NYY | RBI | 0.5 | +179 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 736 | MLB | Brandon Marsh 10 games | PHI vs LAD@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 737 | MLB | Brandon Marsh 10 games | PHI vs LAD@PHI | R | 0.5 | +145 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 738 | MLB | Brandon Marsh 10 games | PHI vs LAD@PHI | RBI | 0.5 | +227 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 739 | MLB | Brett Baty 10 games | NYM vs NYM@MIL | RBI | 0.5 | +270 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 740 | MLB | Brice Turang 10 games | MIL vs NYM@MIL | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 741 | MLB | Brooks Lee 10 games | MIN vs MIN@CLE | R | 0.5 | +165 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 742 | MLB | Brooks Lee 10 games | MIN vs MIN@CLE | RBI | 0.5 | +254 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 743 | MLB | Bryce Harper 10 games | PHI vs LAD@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 744 | MLB | Bryce Harper 10 games | PHI vs LAD@PHI | R | 0.5 | +110 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 745 | MLB | Bryson Stott 10 games | PHI vs LAD@PHI | RBI | 0.5 | +259 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 746 | MLB | Buddy Kennedy 10 games | SEA vs CIN@SEA | H | 0.5 | +105 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 747 | MLB | Buddy Kennedy 10 games | SEA vs CIN@SEA | R | 0.5 | +250 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.5 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 748 | MLB | Byron Buxton 10 games | MIN vs MIN@CLE | R | 0.5 | +100 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 749 | MLB | Byron Buxton 10 games | MIN vs MIN@CLE | RBI | 0.5 | +147 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 750 | MLB | Cal Raleigh 10 games | SEA vs CIN@SEA | HR | 0.5 | +350 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.