Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1051 | MLB | Casey Schmitt 10 games | SF vs SFG@KCR | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1052 | MLB | Casey Schmitt 10 games | SF vs SFG@KCR | RBI | 0.5 | +143 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1053 | MLB | Casey Schmitt 10 games | SF vs SFG@KCR | TB | 1.5 | +105 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -1.4 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1054 | MLB | Ceddanne Rafaela 10 games | BOS vs BAL@BOS | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1055 | MLB | Chandler Simpson 10 games | TB vs TBR@TOR | HR | 0.5 | +1600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1056 | MLB | Chandler Simpson 10 games | TB vs TBR@TOR | RBI | 0.5 | +251 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1057 | MLB | Chase Meidroth 10 games | CWS vs CHW@TEX | HR | 0.5 | +1200 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1058 | MLB | Christian Walker 10 games | HOU vs MIA@HOU | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1059 | MLB | Christian Walker 10 games | HOU vs MIA@HOU | RBI | 0.5 | +158 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1060 | MLB | Christian Yelich 10 games | MIL vs NYM@MIL | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1061 | MLB | Cody Bellinger 10 games | NYY vs PIT@NYY | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1062 | MLB | Colby Thomas 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1063 | MLB | Colby Thomas 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | R | 0.5 | +160 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1064 | MLB | Colby Thomas 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | RBI | 0.5 | +210 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1065 | MLB | Cole Carrigg 10 games | COL vs WSN@COL | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1066 | MLB | Colt Emerson 10 games | SEA vs CIN@SEA | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1067 | MLB | Dalton Rushing 10 games | LAD vs LAD@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1068 | MLB | Dalton Rushing 10 games | LAD vs LAD@PHI | R | 0.5 | +145 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1069 | MLB | Dalton Rushing 10 games | LAD vs LAD@PHI | RBI | 0.5 | +230 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1070 | MLB | Daniel Schneemann 10 games | CLE vs MIN@CLE | RBI | 0.5 | +195 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1071 | MLB | Daniel Susac 10 games | SF vs SFG@KCR | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1072 | MLB | Dansby Swanson 10 games | CHC vs DET@CHC | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1073 | MLB | Dansby Swanson 10 games | CHC vs DET@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +200 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1074 | MLB | Daulton Varsho 10 games | TOR vs TBR@TOR | HR | 0.5 | +525 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1075 | MLB | Daulton Varsho 10 games | TOR vs TBR@TOR | RBI | 0.5 | +212 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1076 | MLB | David Fry 10 games | CLE vs MIN@CLE | R | 0.5 | +120 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1077 | MLB | David Fry 10 games | CLE vs MIN@CLE | RBI | 0.5 | +230 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1078 | MLB | David Peterson 8 games | CHC vs DET@CHC | K | 4.5 | +129 | 2.6 | -1.9 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 4.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1079 | MLB | Denzer Guzman 10 games | LAA vs STL@LAA | TB | 1.5 | +170 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1080 | MLB | Dominic Canzone 10 games | SEA vs CIN@SEA | HR | 0.5 | +400 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1081 | MLB | Dominic Canzone 10 games | SEA vs CIN@SEA | RBI | 0.5 | +197 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1082 | MLB | Dominic Smith 10 games | ATL vs SDP@ATL | HR | 0.5 | +800 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1083 | MLB | Dominic Smith 10 games | ATL vs SDP@ATL | RBI | 0.5 | +200 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1084 | MLB | Drew Cavanaugh 10 games | SF vs SFG@KCR | RBI | 0.5 | +260 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1085 | MLB | Drew Gilbert 10 games | SF vs SFG@KCR | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1086 | MLB | Drew Romo 10 games | CWS vs CHW@TEX | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1087 | MLB | Drew Romo 10 games | CWS vs CHW@TEX | R | 0.5 | +195 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1088 | MLB | Drew Romo 10 games | CWS vs CHW@TEX | RBI | 0.5 | +250 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1089 | MLB | Edmundo Sosa 10 games | PHI vs LAD@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1090 | MLB | Edmundo Sosa 10 games | PHI vs LAD@PHI | R | 0.5 | +125 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1091 | MLB | Edmundo Sosa 10 games | PHI vs LAD@PHI | RBI | 0.5 | +218 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1092 | MLB | Edouard Julien 10 games | COL vs WSN@COL | RBI | 0.5 | +186 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1093 | MLB | Edwin Arroyo 10 games | CIN vs CIN@SEA | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1094 | MLB | Edwin Arroyo 10 games | CIN vs CIN@SEA | R | 0.5 | +188 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1095 | MLB | Edwin Arroyo 10 games | CIN vs CIN@SEA | RBI | 0.5 | +275 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1096 | MLB | Elly De La Cruz 10 games | CIN vs CIN@SEA | H | 1.5 | +188 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1097 | MLB | Ernie Clement 10 games | TOR vs TBR@TOR | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1098 | MLB | Ernie Clement 10 games | TOR vs TBR@TOR | RBI | 0.5 | +248 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1099 | MLB | Ezequiel Duran 10 games | TEX vs CHW@TEX | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1100 | MLB | Ezequiel Tovar 10 games | COL vs WSN@COL | HR | 0.5 | +525 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.