Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201 | MLB | Vinnie Pasquantino 10 games | KC vs SFG@KCR | R | 0.5 | +125 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | +0.6 | 52 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 202 | MLB | Willson Contreras 10 games | BOS vs BAL@BOS | H | 0.5 | -190 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 4/5 | +0.1 | 52 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 203 | MLB | Willy Adames 10 games | SF vs SFG@KCR | H | 0.5 | -180 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 4/5 | -0.1 | 52 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 204 | MLB | Austin Riley 10 games | ATL vs SDP@ATL | RBI | 0.5 | +175 | 1 | +0.5 | 2/5 | +0.7 | 51 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 205 | MLB | Cole Young 10 games | SEA vs CIN@SEA | H | 0.5 | -140 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.5 | 51 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 206 | MLB | Cole Young 10 games | SEA vs CIN@SEA | RBI | 0.5 | +240 | 1 | +0.5 | 2/5 | +1 | 51 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 207 | MLB | Cole Young 10 games | SEA vs CIN@SEA | TB | 1.5 | +190 | 2.2 | +0.7 | 2/5 | +1.2 | 51 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 208 | MLB | Francisco Alvarez 10 games | NYM vs NYM@MIL | TB | 1.5 | +210 | 2.2 | +0.7 | 2/5 | +1.3 | 51 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 209 | MLB | Gunnar Henderson 10 games | BAL vs BAL@BOS | TB | 1.5 | +135 | 2 | +0.5 | 2/5 | +0.7 | 51 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 210 | MLB | Kyle Bradish 9 games | BAL vs BAL@BOS | K | 5.5 | +110 | 6.6 | +1.1 | 2/5 | -1.3 | 51 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 211 | MLB | Nico Hoerner 10 games | CHC vs DET@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +216 | 1 | +0.5 | 2/5 | +1.2 | 51 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 212 | MLB | Spencer Torkelson 10 games | DET vs DET@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +160 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 2/5 | +0.9 | 51 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 213 | MLB | Taylor Walls 10 games | TB vs TBR@TOR | H | 0.5 | -105 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | +0.7 | 51 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 214 | MLB | Wyatt Langford 10 games | TEX vs CHW@TEX | TB | 1.5 | +126 | 2.2 | +0.7 | 2/5 | +0.8 | 51 | F | 5.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 215 | MLB | Derek Hill 10 games | PHI vs LAD@PHI | H | 0.5 | -135 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | -0.5 | 50 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 216 | MLB | Drew Cavanaugh 10 games | SF vs SFG@KCR | H | 0.5 | -135 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +-0 | 50 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 217 | MLB | Francisco Alvarez 10 games | NYM vs NYM@MIL | H | 0.5 | -124 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | -0.1 | 50 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 218 | MLB | Joe Mack 10 games | MIA vs MIA@HOU | H | 0.5 | -128 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 4/5 | +0.1 | 50 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 219 | MLB | Tsung-Che Cheng 10 games | BOS vs BAL@BOS | H | 0.5 | -121 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | -0.5 | 50 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 220 | MLB | Alec Bohm 10 games | PHI vs LAD@PHI | H | 0.5 | -235 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.7 | 49 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 221 | MLB | Alec Burleson 10 games | STL vs STL@LAA | TB | 1.5 | +105 | 1.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0.1 | 49 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 222 | MLB | Andrew Benintendi 10 games | CWS vs CHW@TEX | R | 0.5 | +155 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | -0.4 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 223 | MLB | Brandon Lowe 10 games | PIT vs PIT@NYY | R | 0.5 | +110 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +-0 | 49 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 224 | MLB | Brayan Rocchio 10 games | CLE vs MIN@CLE | R | 0.5 | +140 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | +0.1 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 225 | MLB | Brewer Hicklen 3 games | ATL vs SDP@ATL | RBI | 0.5 | +230 | 0.7 | +0.2 | 2/3 | +0 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 226 | MLB | Bryan Reynolds 10 games | PIT vs PIT@NYY | R | 0.5 | +110 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.5 | 49 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 227 | MLB | Cameron Cauley 10 games | TEX vs CHW@TEX | R | 0.5 | +150 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0.3 | 49 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 228 | MLB | Coby Mayo 10 games | BAL vs BAL@BOS | R | 0.5 | +160 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.1 | 49 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 229 | MLB | Cole Young 10 games | SEA vs CIN@SEA | R | 0.5 | +180 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | +0.3 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 230 | MLB | Colson Montgomery 10 games | CWS vs CHW@TEX | R | 0.5 | +120 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | -0.3 | 49 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 231 | MLB | Derek Hill 10 games | PHI vs LAD@PHI | R | 0.5 | +165 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | +-0 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 232 | MLB | Derek Hill 10 games | PHI vs LAD@PHI | RBI | 0.5 | +231 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | -0.1 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 233 | MLB | Dillon Dingler 10 games | DET vs DET@CHC | H | 0.5 | -240 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 3/5 | +0.8 | 49 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 234 | MLB | Eduardo Valencia 5 games | DET vs DET@CHC | R | 0.5 | +110 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.3 | 49 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 235 | MLB | Eduardo Valencia 5 games | DET vs DET@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +140 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.3 | 49 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 236 | MLB | Elly De La Cruz 10 games | CIN vs CIN@SEA | H | 0.5 | -220 | 1.4 | +0.9 | 4/5 | -0.6 | 49 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 237 | MLB | Enmanuel Valdez 10 games | PIT vs PIT@NYY | HR | 0.5 | +360 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0.3 | 49 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 238 | MLB | Esmerlyn Valdez 10 games | PIT vs PIT@NYY | HR | 0.5 | +350 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0.3 | 49 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 239 | MLB | Ezequiel Duran 10 games | TEX vs CHW@TEX | R | 0.5 | +145 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +-0 | 49 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 240 | MLB | Framber Valdez 9 games | DET vs DET@CHC | K | 4.5 | -115 | 5.2 | +0.7 | 3/5 | -0.7 | 49 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 241 | MLB | Francisco Lindor 10 games | NYM vs NYM@MIL | H | 0.5 | -195 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 3/5 | +0.5 | 49 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 242 | MLB | Gabriel Arias 10 games | CLE vs MIN@CLE | R | 0.5 | +160 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.2 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 243 | MLB | Gabriel Moreno 10 games | AZ vs Athletics@ | R | 0.5 | +125 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | +0.1 | 49 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 244 | MLB | Gleyber Torres 10 games | DET vs DET@CHC | TB | 1.5 | +141 | 1.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | -0.1 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 245 | MLB | Griffin Conine 10 games | MIA vs MIA@HOU | HR | 0.5 | +380 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.1 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 246 | MLB | Griffin Conine 10 games | MIA vs MIA@HOU | R | 0.5 | +155 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.3 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 247 | MLB | Isaac Collins 10 games | KC vs SFG@KCR | TB | 1.5 | +210 | 1.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | +-0 | 49 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 248 | MLB | Jackson Merrill 10 games | SD vs SDP@ATL | TB | 1.5 | +120 | 2 | +0.5 | 1/5 | +1.7 | 49 | F | 5.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 249 | MLB | James Jarvis 10 games | vs SDP@ATL | R | 0.5 | +160 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | -0.2 | 49 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 250 | MLB | James Outman 10 games | DET vs DET@CHC | H | 0.5 | +105 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0.3 | 49 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.