Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 601 | MLB | Trey Yesavage 10 games | TOR vs TOR@BOS | K | 5.5 | +105 | 5 | -0.5 | 2/5 | +0.8 | 40 | F | 9.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 602 | MLB | Tyler Stephenson 10 games | CIN vs CIN@STL | RBI | 0.5 | +244 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 1/5 | +0.7 | 40 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 603 | MLB | Victor Caratini 10 games | MIN vs Athletics@ | H | 0.5 | -161 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.4 | 40 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 604 | MLB | Victor Robles 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | TB | 1.5 | +200 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.9 | 40 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 605 | MLB | Vinnie Pasquantino 10 games | KC vs KCR@DET | H | 1.5 | +400 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0.7 | 40 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 606 | MLB | Xander Bogaerts 10 games | SD vs SDP@MIA | H | 0.5 | -160 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0.1 | 40 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 607 | MLB | Yainer Diaz 10 games | HOU vs HOU@CHW | H | 0.5 | -190 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.2 | 40 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 608 | MLB | Yandy Diaz 10 games | TB vs CLE@TBR | H | 0.5 | -260 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.2 | 40 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 609 | MLB | Zach McKinstry 10 games | DET vs KCR@DET | TB | 1.5 | +190 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | +0.6 | 40 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 610 | MLB | Alex Bregman 10 games | CHC vs CHC@PIT | RBI | 0.5 | +210 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.6 | 39 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 611 | MLB | Alex Bregman 10 games | CHC vs CHC@PIT | TB | 1.5 | +160 | 1.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.9 | 39 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 612 | MLB | Austin Hedges 10 games | CLE vs CLE@TBR | TB | 1.5 | +260 | 1.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -1.2 | 39 | F | 5.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 613 | MLB | Cole Young 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | R | 0.5 | +165 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.6 | 39 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 614 | MLB | Denzer Guzman 10 games | LAA vs LAA@SFG | H | 0.5 | -150 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | -0.6 | 39 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 615 | MLB | Drake Baldwin 10 games | ATL vs ATL@BAL | RBI | 0.5 | +186 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.7 | 39 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 616 | MLB | Drew Cavanaugh 10 games | SF vs LAA@SFG | H | 0.5 | -118 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 39 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 617 | MLB | Elly De La Cruz 10 games | CIN vs CIN@STL | TB | 1.5 | +118 | 1.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -1.2 | 39 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 618 | MLB | Griffin Conine 10 games | MIA vs SDP@MIA | TB | 1.5 | +160 | 1.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -1.4 | 39 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 619 | MLB | James Wood 10 games | WSH vs ARI@WSN | R | 0.5 | -120 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 39 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 620 | MLB | Jared Young 10 games | NYM vs LAD@NYM | H | 0.5 | -117 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 39 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 621 | MLB | Lucas Spence 6 games | HOU vs HOU@CHW | H | 0.5 | -120 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 39 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 622 | MLB | Ryan Jeffers 7 games | MIN vs Athletics@ | RBI | 0.5 | +166 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 2/5 | -0.5 | 39 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 623 | MLB | Spencer Torkelson 10 games | DET vs KCR@DET | RBI | 0.5 | +155 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.6 | 39 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 624 | MLB | A.J. Ewing 10 games | NYM vs LAD@NYM | H | 1.5 | +300 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 625 | MLB | A.J. Ewing 10 games | NYM vs LAD@NYM | TB | 1.5 | +160 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 626 | MLB | Alec Bohm 10 games | PHI vs NYY@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +800 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 627 | MLB | Alec Bohm 10 games | PHI vs NYY@PHI | R | 0.5 | +150 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 628 | MLB | Alec Burleson 10 games | STL vs CIN@STL | R | 0.5 | +105 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 629 | MLB | Alex Bregman 10 games | CHC vs CHC@PIT | H | 1.5 | +280 | 1 | -0.5 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 630 | MLB | Alex Bregman 10 games | CHC vs CHC@PIT | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 1 | -0.5 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 631 | MLB | Andrew Vaughn 10 games | MIL vs COL@MIL | R | 0.5 | +115 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 632 | MLB | Anthony Seigler 10 games | BOS vs TOR@BOS | RBI | 0.5 | +253 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.4 | 37 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 633 | MLB | Austin Hedges 10 games | CLE vs CLE@TBR | RBI | 0.5 | +315 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 37 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 634 | MLB | Austin Riley 10 games | ATL vs ATL@BAL | H | 1.5 | +280 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 635 | MLB | Blaze Jordan 10 games | STL vs CIN@STL | R | 0.5 | +165 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 636 | MLB | Braden Montgomery 10 games | CWS vs HOU@CHW | R | 0.5 | +130 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 637 | MLB | Brandon Marsh 10 games | PHI vs NYY@PHI | R | 0.5 | +140 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 638 | MLB | Brandon Nimmo 10 games | TEX vs SEA@TEX | H | 1.5 | +260 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 37 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 639 | MLB | Brandon Nimmo 10 games | TEX vs SEA@TEX | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 1 | -0.5 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 640 | MLB | Brandon Valenzuela 10 games | TOR vs TOR@BOS | RBI | 0.5 | +230 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 641 | MLB | Braxton Fulford 10 games | COL vs COL@MIL | H | 0.5 | +110 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 642 | MLB | Brayan Rocchio 10 games | CLE vs CLE@TBR | H | 1.5 | +280 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 643 | MLB | Brayan Rocchio 10 games | CLE vs CLE@TBR | R | 0.5 | +180 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 644 | MLB | Brooks Lee 10 games | MIN vs Athletics@ | H | 1.5 | +300 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 645 | MLB | Brooks Lee 10 games | MIN vs Athletics@ | R | 0.5 | +140 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.5 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 646 | MLB | Bryan Reynolds 10 games | PIT vs CHC@PIT | R | 0.5 | +130 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.4 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 647 | MLB | Bryce Eldridge 10 games | SF vs LAA@SFG | H | 0.5 | -190 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | -0.6 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 648 | MLB | Bryce Harper 10 games | PHI vs NYY@PHI | R | 0.5 | +120 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 649 | MLB | Caleb Durbin 10 games | BOS vs TOR@BOS | R | 0.5 | +155 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 650 | MLB | Caleb Durbin 10 games | BOS vs TOR@BOS | RBI | 0.5 | +220 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.