Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2051 | MLB | Tristan Peters 10 games | CWS vs HOU@CHW | H | 1.5 | +380 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2052 | MLB | Tristan Peters 10 games | CWS vs HOU@CHW | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2053 | MLB | Tristan Peters 10 games | CWS vs HOU@CHW | RBI | 0.5 | +250 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2054 | MLB | Tristan Peters 10 games | CWS vs HOU@CHW | TB | 1.5 | +190 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | -0.7 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2055 | MLB | Tsung-Che Cheng 10 games | BOS vs TOR@BOS | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2056 | MLB | Tyler Freeman 10 games | COL vs COL@MIL | H | 1.5 | +400 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2057 | MLB | Tyler Freeman 10 games | COL vs COL@MIL | R | 1.5 | +2000 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2058 | MLB | Tyler Freeman 10 games | COL vs COL@MIL | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2059 | MLB | Tyler Freeman 10 games | COL vs COL@MIL | TB | 1.5 | +230 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2060 | MLB | Vaughn Grissom 10 games | LAA vs LAA@SFG | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2061 | MLB | Vaughn Grissom 10 games | LAA vs LAA@SFG | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2062 | MLB | Victor Robles 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2063 | MLB | Vinnie Pasquantino 10 games | KC vs KCR@DET | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2064 | MLB | Vladimir Guerrero Jr. 10 games | TOR vs TOR@BOS | R | 1.5 | +600 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2065 | MLB | Vladimir Guerrero Jr. 10 games | TOR vs TOR@BOS | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2066 | MLB | Willi Castro 10 games | COL vs COL@MIL | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2067 | MLB | William Contreras 10 games | MIL vs COL@MIL | H | 1.5 | +190 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2068 | MLB | William Contreras 10 games | MIL vs COL@MIL | R | 1.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2069 | MLB | Yainer Diaz 10 games | HOU vs HOU@CHW | RBI | 0.5 | +231 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2070 | MLB | Yainer Diaz 10 games | HOU vs HOU@CHW | TB | 1.5 | +160 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -1.3 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2071 | MLB | Yandy Diaz 10 games | TB vs CLE@TBR | RBI | 0.5 | +198 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2072 | MLB | Yandy Diaz 10 games | TB vs CLE@TBR | TB | 1.5 | +120 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -1.3 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2073 | MLB | Zach McKinstry 10 games | DET vs KCR@DET | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2074 | MLB | Zach McKinstry 10 games | DET vs KCR@DET | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2075 | MLB | Zach Neto 10 games | LAA vs LAA@SFG | R | 1.5 | +800 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2076 | MLB | Zach Neto 10 games | LAA vs LAA@SFG | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2077 | MLB | Byron Buxton 10 games | MIN vs Athletics@ | R | 0.5 | -150 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 25 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2078 | MLB | Casey Schmitt 10 games | SF vs LAA@SFG | H | 0.5 | -220 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.7 | 25 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2079 | MLB | Daniel Susac 10 games | SF vs LAA@SFG | H | 0.5 | -140 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 25 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2080 | MLB | Davis Martin 9 games | CWS vs HOU@CHW | K | 3.5 | -220 | 2.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | -1.1 | 25 | F | 3.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2081 | MLB | Davis Schneider 10 games | TOR vs TOR@BOS | H | 0.5 | -105 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 25 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2082 | MLB | Jake Bauers 10 games | MIL vs COL@MIL | H | 0.5 | -143 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 25 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2083 | MLB | Jakob Marsee 10 games | MIA vs SDP@MIA | H | 0.5 | -140 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 25 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2084 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs LAA@SFG | H | 0.5 | -145 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 25 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2085 | MLB | Luis Robert Jr. 3 games | NYM vs LAD@NYM | H | 0.5 | -150 | 0.3 | -0.2 | 1/3 | +0 | 25 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2086 | MLB | Myles Straw 10 games | TOR vs TOR@BOS | H | 0.5 | -141 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 25 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2087 | MLB | Tristan Peters 10 games | CWS vs HOU@CHW | H | 0.5 | -140 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 25 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2088 | MLB | Shohei Ohtani 10 games | LAD vs LAD@NYM | R | 0.5 | -135 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 24 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2089 | MLB | Andrew Benintendi 10 games | CWS vs HOU@CHW | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2090 | MLB | Austin Martin 10 games | MIN vs Athletics@ | H | 0.5 | -199 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 23 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2091 | MLB | Ben Rice 10 games | NYY vs NYY@PHI | RBI | 1.5 | +500 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.9 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2092 | MLB | Braden Montgomery 10 games | CWS vs HOU@CHW | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.7 | 23 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2093 | MLB | Brice Turang 10 games | MIL vs COL@MIL | RBI | 1.5 | +475 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.7 | 23 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2094 | MLB | Carson Kelly 10 games | CHC vs CHC@PIT | TB | 1.5 | +200 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.8 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2095 | MLB | Casey Schmitt 10 games | SF vs LAA@SFG | H | 1.5 | +240 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.7 | 23 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2096 | MLB | Davis Martin 9 games | CWS vs HOU@CHW | K | 5.5 | +230 | 2.8 | -2.7 | 0/5 | -1.1 | 23 | F | 3.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2097 | MLB | Davis Schneider 10 games | TOR vs TOR@BOS | H | 1.5 | +500 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2098 | MLB | Davis Schneider 10 games | TOR vs TOR@BOS | TB | 1.5 | +230 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -1.4 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2099 | MLB | Eli White 10 games | ATL vs ATL@BAL | H | 1.5 | +450 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2100 | MLB | Geraldo Perdomo 10 games | AZ vs ARI@WSN | R | 1.5 | +500 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.