Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1351 | MLB | Braden Montgomery 10 games | CWS vs HOU@CHW | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1352 | MLB | Brandon Lowe 10 games | PIT vs CHC@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +400 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1353 | MLB | Brandon Nimmo 10 games | TEX vs SEA@TEX | RBI | 1.5 | +500 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1354 | MLB | Brice Turang 10 games | MIL vs COL@MIL | R | 1.5 | +600 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1355 | MLB | Bryan Reynolds 10 games | PIT vs CHC@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1356 | MLB | Bryan Reynolds 10 games | PIT vs CHC@PIT | RBI | 0.5 | +188 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1357 | MLB | Bryan Reynolds 10 games | PIT vs CHC@PIT | TB | 1.5 | +130 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.9 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1358 | MLB | Bryce Eldridge 10 games | SF vs LAA@SFG | H | 1.5 | +260 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1359 | MLB | Bryson Stott 10 games | PHI vs NYY@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1360 | MLB | Bryson Stott 10 games | PHI vs NYY@PHI | RBI | 0.5 | +273 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1361 | MLB | Byron Buxton 10 games | MIN vs Athletics@ | HR | 0.5 | +240 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1362 | MLB | Byron Buxton 10 games | MIN vs Athletics@ | RBI | 0.5 | +110 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1363 | MLB | Byron Buxton 10 games | MIN vs Athletics@ | TB | 1.5 | -120 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1364 | MLB | Cal Raleigh 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | H | 1.5 | +360 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1365 | MLB | Cam Smith 10 games | HOU vs HOU@CHW | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1366 | MLB | Carson Benge 10 games | NYM vs LAD@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +800 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1367 | MLB | Carson Benge 10 games | NYM vs LAD@NYM | R | 0.5 | +180 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1368 | MLB | Carson Kelly 10 games | CHC vs CHC@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1369 | MLB | Casey Mize 7 games | DET vs KCR@DET | K | 6.5 | +200 | 6 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.9 | 29 | F | 3.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1370 | MLB | Casey Schmitt 10 games | SF vs LAA@SFG | H | 1.5 | +260 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1371 | MLB | Casey Schmitt 10 games | SF vs LAA@SFG | R | 1.5 | +900 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.2 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1372 | MLB | Ceddanne Rafaela 10 games | BOS vs TOR@BOS | R | 1.5 | +900 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 0/5 | +-0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1373 | MLB | Chandler Simpson 10 games | TB vs CLE@TBR | HR | 0.5 | +1600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1374 | MLB | Chandler Simpson 10 games | TB vs CLE@TBR | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1375 | MLB | Chandler Simpson 10 games | TB vs CLE@TBR | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.4 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1376 | MLB | Chase DeLauter 10 games | CLE vs CLE@TBR | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1377 | MLB | Chase DeLauter 10 games | CLE vs CLE@TBR | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.7 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1378 | MLB | Chase Meidroth 10 games | CWS vs HOU@CHW | HR | 0.5 | +1400 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1379 | MLB | Christian Encarnacion-Strand 4 games | BAL vs ATL@BAL | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.5 | -1 | 0/4 | +0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1380 | MLB | Christian Walker 10 games | HOU vs HOU@CHW | HR | 0.5 | +400 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1381 | MLB | Cody Bellinger 10 games | NYY vs NYY@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1382 | MLB | Colby Thomas 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | R | 0.5 | +145 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1383 | MLB | Colby Thomas 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | RBI | 0.5 | +175 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1384 | MLB | Cole Carrigg 10 games | COL vs COL@MIL | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1385 | MLB | Cole Carrigg 10 games | COL vs COL@MIL | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1386 | MLB | Cole Young 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | R | 0.5 | +165 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1387 | MLB | Cole Young 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | RBI | 0.5 | +271 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1388 | MLB | Colson Montgomery 10 games | CWS vs HOU@CHW | R | 0.5 | +125 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1389 | MLB | Colson Montgomery 10 games | CWS vs HOU@CHW | TB | 1.5 | +160 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -1.2 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1390 | MLB | Colt Emerson 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1391 | MLB | Colt Keith 10 games | DET vs KCR@DET | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1392 | MLB | Colt Keith 10 games | DET vs KCR@DET | RBI | 0.5 | +196 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1393 | MLB | Colton Cowser 10 games | BAL vs ATL@BAL | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1394 | MLB | Colton Cowser 10 games | BAL vs ATL@BAL | R | 0.5 | +130 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1395 | MLB | Colton Cowser 10 games | BAL vs ATL@BAL | RBI | 0.5 | +189 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1396 | MLB | Connor Wong 10 games | BOS vs TOR@BOS | R | 0.5 | +200 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1397 | MLB | Connor Wong 10 games | BOS vs TOR@BOS | RBI | 0.5 | +260 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1398 | MLB | Curtis Mead 10 games | WSH vs ARI@WSN | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1399 | MLB | Curtis Mead 10 games | WSH vs ARI@WSN | RBI | 0.5 | +158 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1400 | MLB | Curtis Mead 10 games | WSH vs ARI@WSN | TB | 1.5 | +115 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.9 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.