Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1601 | MLB | Oswald Peraza 10 games | LAA vs LAA@SFG | HR | 0.5 | +800 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1602 | MLB | Otto Lopez 10 games | MIA vs SDP@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1603 | MLB | Otto Lopez 10 games | MIA vs SDP@MIA | TB | 2.5 | +230 | 1.2 | -1.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1604 | MLB | Ozzie Albies 10 games | ATL vs ATL@BAL | R | 1.5 | +700 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 0/5 | +0.4 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1605 | MLB | Ozzie Albies 10 games | ATL vs ATL@BAL | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.2 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1606 | MLB | Pete Alonso 10 games | BAL vs ATL@BAL | HR | 0.5 | +325 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1607 | MLB | Pete Alonso 10 games | BAL vs ATL@BAL | R | 1.5 | +600 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1608 | MLB | Pete Alonso 10 games | BAL vs ATL@BAL | RBI | 0.5 | +155 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1609 | MLB | Pete Crow-Armstrong 10 games | CHC vs CHC@PIT | R | 1.5 | +700 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 29 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1610 | MLB | Randy Arozarena 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1611 | MLB | Randy Arozarena 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1612 | MLB | Randy Arozarena 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | RBI | 0.5 | +221 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1613 | MLB | Robbie Ray 10 games | SF vs LAA@SFG | K | 5.5 | -125 | 4.4 | -1.1 | 2/5 | -0.4 | 29 | F | 5.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1614 | MLB | Robert Gasser 8 games | MIL vs COL@MIL | K | 5.5 | +110 | 4.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -1.1 | 29 | F | 4.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1615 | MLB | Royce Lewis 10 games | MIN vs Athletics@ | HR | 0.5 | +350 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1616 | MLB | Royce Lewis 10 games | MIN vs Athletics@ | RBI | 0.5 | +165 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1617 | MLB | Ryan Kreidler 10 games | MIN vs Athletics@ | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1618 | MLB | Ryan Kreidler 10 games | MIN vs Athletics@ | R | 0.5 | +145 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1619 | MLB | Ryan Kreidler 10 games | MIN vs Athletics@ | RBI | 0.5 | +210 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1620 | MLB | Ryan McMahon 10 games | NYY vs NYY@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1621 | MLB | Ryan McMahon 10 games | NYY vs NYY@PHI | RBI | 0.5 | +221 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1622 | MLB | Ryan O'Hearn 10 games | PIT vs CHC@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1623 | MLB | Ryan Waldschmidt 10 games | AZ vs ARI@WSN | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1624 | MLB | Sal Stewart 10 games | CIN vs CIN@STL | R | 1.5 | +700 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1625 | MLB | Salvador Perez 10 games | KC vs KCR@DET | H | 1.5 | +280 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +-0 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1626 | MLB | Salvador Perez 10 games | KC vs KCR@DET | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1627 | MLB | Sam Antonacci 10 games | CWS vs HOU@CHW | HR | 0.5 | +800 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1628 | MLB | Sam Huff 9 games | BAL vs ATL@BAL | H | 0.5 | +102 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1629 | MLB | Sam Huff 9 games | BAL vs ATL@BAL | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1630 | MLB | Sam Huff 9 games | BAL vs ATL@BAL | R | 0.5 | +190 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1631 | MLB | Sam Huff 9 games | BAL vs ATL@BAL | RBI | 0.5 | +320 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1632 | MLB | Shohei Ohtani 10 games | LAD vs LAD@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +300 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1633 | MLB | Spencer Steer 10 games | CIN vs CIN@STL | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1634 | MLB | Spencer Steer 10 games | CIN vs CIN@STL | R | 0.5 | +130 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1635 | MLB | Spencer Steer 10 games | CIN vs CIN@STL | RBI | 0.5 | +200 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1636 | MLB | Steven Kwan 10 games | CLE vs CLE@TBR | HR | 0.5 | +1300 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1637 | MLB | Sung-Mun Song 10 games | SD vs SDP@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1638 | MLB | Sung-Mun Song 10 games | SD vs SDP@MIA | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1639 | MLB | Sung-Mun Song 10 games | SD vs SDP@MIA | RBI | 0.5 | +300 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1640 | MLB | Sung-Mun Song 10 games | SD vs SDP@MIA | TB | 1.5 | +230 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1641 | MLB | Taylor Walls 10 games | TB vs CLE@TBR | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1642 | MLB | Taylor Walls 10 games | TB vs CLE@TBR | RBI | 0.5 | +275 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1643 | MLB | Taylor Ward 10 games | BAL vs ATL@BAL | H | 1.5 | +280 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.3 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1644 | MLB | Taylor Ward 10 games | BAL vs ATL@BAL | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1645 | MLB | Taylor Ward 10 games | BAL vs ATL@BAL | RBI | 0.5 | +190 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1646 | MLB | Tim Tawa 10 games | AZ vs ARI@WSN | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1647 | MLB | TJ Rumfield 10 games | COL vs COL@MIL | HR | 0.5 | +800 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1648 | MLB | Tommy White 6 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1649 | MLB | Tommy White 6 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | RBI | 0.5 | +200 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1650 | MLB | Travis Bazzana 10 games | CLE vs CLE@TBR | H | 1.5 | +320 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.7 | 29 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.