Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2051 | MLB | Spencer Steer 10 games | CIN vs CIN@STL | H | 1.5 | +280 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.8 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2052 | MLB | Spencer Torkelson 10 games | DET vs KCR@DET | H | 0.5 | -155 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 23 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2053 | MLB | Spencer Torkelson 10 games | DET vs KCR@DET | RBI | 1.5 | +500 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.7 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2054 | MLB | Travis Bazzana 10 games | CLE vs CLE@TBR | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2055 | MLB | Trent Grisham 10 games | NYY vs NYY@PHI | TB | 1.5 | +200 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.9 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2056 | MLB | Tyler Callihan 10 games | PIT vs CHC@PIT | H | 1.5 | +475 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2057 | MLB | Tyler Tolbert 10 games | KC vs KCR@DET | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.8 | 23 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2058 | MLB | Will Warren 9 games | NYY vs NYY@PHI | K | 4.5 | +130 | 2.6 | -1.9 | 1/5 | -1.6 | 23 | F | 5.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2059 | MLB | Will Warren 9 games | NYY vs NYY@PHI | K | 5.5 | +270 | 2.6 | -2.9 | 1/5 | -1.6 | 23 | F | 5.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2060 | MLB | Wilyer Abreu 10 games | BOS vs TOR@BOS | RBI | 1.5 | +500 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.9 | 23 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2061 | MLB | Xavier Edwards 10 games | MIA vs SDP@MIA | H | 0.5 | -230 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +-0 | 23 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2062 | MLB | Yainer Diaz 10 games | HOU vs HOU@CHW | TB | 1.5 | +132 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -1.3 | 23 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2063 | MLB | Yandy Diaz 10 games | TB vs CLE@TBR | TB | 1.5 | +115 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -1.3 | 23 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2064 | MLB | Byron Buxton 10 games | MIN vs Athletics@ | R | 0.5 | -150 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 22 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2065 | MLB | Parker Messick 10 games | CLE vs CLE@TBR | K | 3.5 | -325 | 3.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | -2 | 22 | F | 6.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2066 | MLB | Trent Grisham 10 games | NYY vs NYY@PHI | H | 0.5 | -140 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 22 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2067 | MLB | Tyler Tolbert 10 games | KC vs KCR@DET | H | 0.5 | -145 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -1.3 | 22 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2068 | MLB | Amed Rosario 10 games | NYY vs NYY@PHI | H | 0.5 | -193 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 20 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2069 | MLB | Brandon Lowe 10 games | PIT vs CHC@PIT | H | 0.5 | -200 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.8 | 20 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2070 | MLB | Bryan Reynolds 10 games | PIT vs CHC@PIT | H | 0.5 | -235 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.7 | 20 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2071 | MLB | Drew Rasmussen 10 games | TB vs CLE@TBR | K | 5.5 | +120 | 3 | -2.5 | 0/5 | -2.6 | 20 | F | 9.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2072 | MLB | Drew Rasmussen 10 games | TB vs CLE@TBR | K | 6.5 | +240 | 3 | -3.5 | 0/5 | -2.6 | 20 | F | 9.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2073 | MLB | Garrett Mitchell 10 games | MIL vs COL@MIL | H | 0.5 | -182 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.9 | 20 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2074 | MLB | Jac Caglianone 10 games | KC vs KCR@DET | H | 0.5 | -220 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.8 | 20 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2075 | MLB | Lane Thomas 10 games | KC vs KCR@DET | H | 0.5 | -220 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -1 | 20 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2076 | MLB | Lane Thomas 10 games | KC vs KCR@DET | TB | 1.5 | +133 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -1.8 | 20 | F | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2077 | MLB | Nick Kurtz 10 games | ATH vs Athletics@ | H | 0.5 | -212 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 20 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2078 | MLB | Petey Halpin 10 games | CLE vs CLE@TBR | TB | 1.5 | +240 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -1.6 | 20 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2079 | MLB | Shohei Ohtani 10 games | LAD vs LAD@NYM | R | 0.5 | -155 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 20 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2080 | MLB | Spencer Steer 10 games | CIN vs CIN@STL | H | 0.5 | -190 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.8 | 20 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2081 | MLB | Tyler Tolbert 10 games | KC vs KCR@DET | TB | 1.5 | +220 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -2 | 20 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 2082 | MLB | Wilyer Abreu 10 games | BOS vs TOR@BOS | H | 0.5 | -230 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.9 | 20 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2083 | MLB | Drew Rasmussen 10 games | TB vs CLE@TBR | K | 4.5 | -155 | 3 | -1.5 | 2/5 | -2.6 | 19 | F | 9.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2084 | MLB | Will Warren 9 games | NYY vs NYY@PHI | K | 3.5 | -220 | 2.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -1.6 | 17 | F | 5.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 2085 | MLB | Ali Sanchez | NYY vs NYY@PHI | H | 0.5 | -125 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2086 | MLB | Ali Sanchez | NYY vs NYY@PHI | H | 1.5 | +400 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2087 | MLB | Ali Sanchez | NYY vs NYY@PHI | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2088 | MLB | Ali Sanchez | NYY vs NYY@PHI | R | 0.5 | +230 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2089 | MLB | Ali Sanchez | NYY vs NYY@PHI | R | 1.5 | +1500 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2090 | MLB | Ali Sanchez | NYY vs NYY@PHI | RBI | 0.5 | +344 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2091 | MLB | Ali Sanchez | NYY vs NYY@PHI | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2092 | MLB | Ali Sanchez | NYY vs NYY@PHI | TB | 1.5 | +250 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2093 | MLB | Andrew Abbott | CIN vs CIN@STL | Outs | 17.5 | -101 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2094 | MLB | Angel Martinez | CLE vs CLE@TBR | H | 0.5 | -140 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2095 | MLB | Angel Martinez | CLE vs CLE@TBR | H | 1.5 | +380 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2096 | MLB | Angel Martinez | CLE vs CLE@TBR | HR | 0.5 | +800 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2097 | MLB | Angel Martinez | CLE vs CLE@TBR | R | 0.5 | +200 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2098 | MLB | Angel Martinez | CLE vs CLE@TBR | R | 1.5 | +1300 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2099 | MLB | Angel Martinez | CLE vs CLE@TBR | RBI | 0.5 | +271 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 2100 | MLB | Angel Martinez | CLE vs CLE@TBR | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.