Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 501 | MLB | James Jarvis 10 games | vs ATL@NYM | R | 0.5 | +180 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 502 | MLB | James Jarvis 10 games | vs ATL@NYM | RBI | 0.5 | +308 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 503 | MLB | Jared Young 10 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | H | 1.5 | +450 | 1 | -0.5 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 37 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 504 | MLB | Jarren Duran 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | R | 0.5 | +110 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 505 | MLB | Javier Sanoja 10 games | MIA vs PHI@MIA | H | 0.5 | -165 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | -0.7 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 506 | MLB | Javier Sanoja 10 games | MIA vs PHI@MIA | R | 0.5 | +230 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.4 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 507 | MLB | JJ Bleday 10 games | CIN vs CLE@CIN | R | 0.5 | +105 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 508 | MLB | Jo Adell 10 games | LAA vs HOU@LAA | HR | 0.5 | +525 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 509 | MLB | Jo Adell 10 games | LAA vs HOU@LAA | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 510 | MLB | Joe Mack 10 games | MIA vs PHI@MIA | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +-0 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 511 | MLB | Jonah Heim 10 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | RBI | 0.5 | +194 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 512 | MLB | Jordan Walker 10 games | STL vs CHC@STL | H | 1.5 | +190 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 513 | MLB | Jordan Walker 10 games | STL vs CHC@STL | TB | 1.5 | +106 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 514 | MLB | Jorge Soler 10 games | LAA vs HOU@LAA | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | +-0 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 515 | MLB | Jose Altuve 10 games | HOU vs HOU@LAA | RBI | 0.5 | +200 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 516 | MLB | Julio Rodriguez 5 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | R | 0.5 | +105 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 517 | MLB | Kazuma Okamoto 10 games | TOR vs TOR@WSN | R | 0.5 | +100 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.5 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 518 | MLB | LaMonte Wade Jr. 10 games | HOU vs HOU@LAA | R | 0.5 | +140 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 519 | MLB | Leody Taveras 10 games | BAL vs BAL@DET | R | 0.5 | +165 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 37 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 520 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs HOU@LAA | H | 1.5 | +500 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 521 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs HOU@LAA | TB | 1.5 | +240 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 522 | MLB | Luis Robert Jr. 6 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 523 | MLB | Luis Robert Jr. 6 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | RBI | 0.5 | +183 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 524 | MLB | Marcus Semien 10 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 525 | MLB | Marcus Semien 10 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | R | 0.5 | +150 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 526 | MLB | Matt Olson 10 games | ATL vs ATL@NYM | H | 1.5 | +280 | 1 | -0.5 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 527 | MLB | Max Kepler 10 games | AZ vs ARI@PIT | R | 0.5 | +150 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 528 | MLB | Merrill Kelly 10 games | AZ vs ARI@PIT | K | 5.5 | +215 | 4.2 | -1.3 | 2/5 | +0.6 | 37 | F | 6.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 529 | MLB | Michael Busch 10 games | CHC vs CHC@STL | R | 0.5 | +105 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.5 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 530 | MLB | Michael Harris II 10 games | ATL vs ATL@NYM | H | 1.5 | +220 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 531 | MLB | Miguel Amaya 10 games | CHC vs CHC@STL | TB | 1.5 | +180 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 37 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 532 | MLB | Miguel Vargas 10 games | CWS vs NYY@CHW | TB | 1.5 | +135 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 37 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 533 | MLB | Mitch Keller 9 games | PIT vs ARI@PIT | K | 3.5 | -170 | 3.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.8 | 37 | F | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 534 | MLB | Nathan Lukes 10 games | TOR vs TOR@WSN | TB | 1.5 | +130 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 535 | MLB | Nathaniel Lowe 10 games | CIN vs CLE@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 536 | MLB | Nathaniel Lowe 10 games | CIN vs CLE@CIN | R | 0.5 | +130 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 537 | MLB | Nathaniel Lowe 10 games | CIN vs CLE@CIN | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 538 | MLB | Nick Gonzales 10 games | PIT vs ARI@PIT | RBI | 0.5 | +220 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 539 | MLB | Nick Gonzales 10 games | PIT vs ARI@PIT | TB | 1.5 | +136 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 37 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 540 | MLB | Noelvi Marte 10 games | CIN vs CLE@CIN | TB | 1.5 | +142 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | -0.4 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 541 | MLB | Nolan Arenado 10 games | AZ vs ARI@PIT | R | 0.5 | +165 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 542 | MLB | Nolan Schanuel 10 games | LAA vs HOU@LAA | R | 0.5 | +140 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 543 | MLB | Ozzie Albies 10 games | ATL vs ATL@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 544 | MLB | Patrick Bailey 10 games | CLE vs CLE@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 545 | MLB | Pete Alonso 10 games | BAL vs BAL@DET | H | 1.5 | +220 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 37 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 546 | MLB | Pete Crow-Armstrong 10 games | CHC vs CHC@STL | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.5 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 547 | MLB | Rafael Devers 10 games | SF vs MIL@SFG | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 548 | MLB | Riley Greene 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | RBI | 0.5 | +147 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +-0 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 549 | MLB | Sam Antonacci 10 games | CWS vs NYY@CHW | TB | 1.5 | +165 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 550 | MLB | Seiya Suzuki 10 games | CHC vs CHC@STL | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 37 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.