Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 901 | MLB | Ryan O'Hearn 10 games | PIT vs ARI@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 902 | MLB | Ryan O'Hearn 10 games | PIT vs ARI@PIT | R | 1.5 | +900 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 903 | MLB | Sal Stewart 10 games | CIN vs CLE@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +375 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 904 | MLB | Sal Stewart 10 games | CIN vs CLE@CIN | RBI | 1.5 | +475 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 905 | MLB | Sal Stewart 10 games | CIN vs CLE@CIN | TB | 2.5 | +220 | 1.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 906 | MLB | Spencer Jones 10 games | NYY vs NYY@CHW | R | 0.5 | +155 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 907 | MLB | Spencer Torkelson 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | H | 1.5 | +450 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 908 | MLB | Spencer Torkelson 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 909 | MLB | Spencer Torkelson 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 910 | MLB | Steven Kwan 10 games | CLE vs CLE@CIN | R | 0.5 | +125 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 911 | MLB | Steven Kwan 10 games | CLE vs CLE@CIN | RBI | 0.5 | +314 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 912 | MLB | Taylor Ward 10 games | BAL vs BAL@DET | R | 1.5 | +900 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 913 | MLB | Tim Tawa 10 games | AZ vs ARI@PIT | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 914 | MLB | Tommy White 8 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 915 | MLB | Trea Turner 10 games | PHI vs PHI@MIA | H | 1.5 | +190 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 916 | MLB | Trea Turner 10 games | PHI vs PHI@MIA | R | 1.5 | +550 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 917 | MLB | Trea Turner 10 games | PHI vs PHI@MIA | RBI | 0.5 | +205 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 918 | MLB | Tyler Callihan 10 games | PIT vs ARI@PIT | R | 0.5 | +175 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 919 | MLB | Tyler Soderstrom 10 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | H | 1.5 | +240 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 920 | MLB | Tyler Soderstrom 10 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | TB | 1.5 | +120 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 32 | F | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 921 | MLB | Tyler Stephenson 10 games | CIN vs CLE@CIN | H | 1.5 | +280 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 922 | MLB | Tyler Stephenson 10 games | CIN vs CLE@CIN | RBI | 0.5 | +190 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 923 | MLB | Tyrone Taylor 10 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | H | 1.5 | +380 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 924 | MLB | Vaughn Grissom 10 games | LAA vs HOU@LAA | H | 1.5 | +320 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 925 | MLB | Vaughn Grissom 10 games | LAA vs HOU@LAA | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 926 | MLB | Willson Contreras 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | H | 1.5 | +190 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 927 | MLB | Willson Contreras 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | RBI | 0.5 | +127 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 928 | MLB | Willy Adames 10 games | SF vs MIL@SFG | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +-0 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 929 | MLB | Wilyer Abreu 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | H | 1.5 | +220 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 930 | MLB | Wyatt Langford 10 games | TEX vs SEA@TEX | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | +-0 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 931 | MLB | Xavier Edwards 10 games | MIA vs PHI@MIA | H | 1.5 | +320 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 932 | MLB | Yordan Alvarez 10 games | HOU vs HOU@LAA | HR | 0.5 | +240 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 32 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 933 | MLB | Yordan Alvarez 10 games | HOU vs HOU@LAA | R | 1.5 | +400 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 934 | MLB | Zach McKinstry 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | H | 1.5 | +340 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 32 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 935 | MLB | Zach McKinstry 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | RBI | 0.5 | +246 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 936 | MLB | Zach Neto 10 games | LAA vs HOU@LAA | H | 1.5 | +320 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 32 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 937 | MLB | Zach Neto 10 games | LAA vs HOU@LAA | R | 0.5 | +105 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 32 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 938 | MLB | Chase Burns 8 games | CIN vs CLE@CIN | K | 6.5 | +112 | 5.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | -2.5 | 31 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 939 | MLB | Dillon Dingler 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | TB | 1.5 | +130 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | -1.8 | 31 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 940 | MLB | Nick Kurtz 10 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | R | 0.5 | -105 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 31 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 941 | MLB | Nolan Arenado 10 games | AZ vs ARI@PIT | TB | 1.5 | +170 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | -1.6 | 31 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 942 | MLB | Alex Bregman 10 games | CHC vs CHC@STL | H | 0.5 | -235 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.9 | 30 | F | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 943 | MLB | Curtis Mead 10 games | WSH vs BOS@Athlet | H | 0.5 | -260 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 2/5 | -1.2 | 30 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 944 | MLB | JJ Wetherholt 10 games | STL vs CHC@STL | H | 0.5 | -250 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.8 | 30 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 945 | MLB | Nolan Arenado 10 games | AZ vs ARI@PIT | H | 0.5 | -161 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.8 | 30 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 946 | MLB | A.J. Ewing 10 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | RBI | 0.5 | +230 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 947 | MLB | Alec Burleson 10 games | STL vs CHC@STL | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 948 | MLB | Alex Bregman 10 games | CHC vs CHC@STL | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 949 | MLB | Alex Bregman 10 games | CHC vs CHC@STL | RBI | 0.5 | +167 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.9 | 29 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 950 | MLB | Alika Williams 10 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.