Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 951 | MLB | Amed Rosario 10 games | NYY vs NYY@CHW | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 952 | MLB | Amed Rosario 10 games | NYY vs NYY@CHW | RBI | 0.5 | +208 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 953 | MLB | Andrew Benintendi 10 games | CWS vs NYY@CHW | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 954 | MLB | Andrew Vaughn 10 games | MIL vs MIL@SFG | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 955 | MLB | Andruw Monasterio 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 956 | MLB | Andruw Monasterio 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | R | 1.5 | +700 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 957 | MLB | Anthony Seigler 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | R | 0.5 | -115 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | +0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 958 | MLB | Anthony Volpe 10 games | NYY vs NYY@CHW | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 959 | MLB | Anthony Volpe 10 games | NYY vs NYY@CHW | R | 0.5 | +130 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 960 | MLB | Austin Riley 10 games | ATL vs ATL@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +400 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 961 | MLB | Austin Riley 10 games | ATL vs ATL@NYM | R | 0.5 | +125 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 962 | MLB | Austin Riley 10 games | ATL vs ATL@NYM | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 963 | MLB | Blaze Jordan 10 games | STL vs CHC@STL | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 964 | MLB | Blaze Jordan 10 games | STL vs CHC@STL | R | 0.5 | +140 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 965 | MLB | Bo Bichette 10 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 966 | MLB | Braden Montgomery 10 games | CWS vs NYY@CHW | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 967 | MLB | Braden Montgomery 10 games | CWS vs NYY@CHW | RBI | 0.5 | +250 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.8 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 968 | MLB | Braden Montgomery 10 games | CWS vs NYY@CHW | TB | 1.5 | +155 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 969 | MLB | Brady House 1 games | WSH vs TOR@WSN | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 970 | MLB | Brandon Lowe 10 games | PIT vs ARI@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +375 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 971 | MLB | Brandon Marsh 10 games | PHI vs PHI@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 972 | MLB | Brandon Marsh 10 games | PHI vs PHI@MIA | RBI | 0.5 | +175 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 973 | MLB | Brandon Nimmo 10 games | TEX vs SEA@TEX | RBI | 0.5 | +182 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.7 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 974 | MLB | Brayan Rocchio 10 games | CLE vs CLE@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 975 | MLB | Bryan Reynolds 10 games | PIT vs ARI@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 976 | MLB | Bryan Reynolds 10 games | PIT vs ARI@PIT | RBI | 0.5 | +178 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 977 | MLB | Bryan Reynolds 10 games | PIT vs ARI@PIT | TB | 1.5 | +121 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 978 | MLB | Bryce Eldridge 10 games | SF vs MIL@SFG | HR | 0.5 | +525 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 979 | MLB | Bryce Eldridge 10 games | SF vs MIL@SFG | R | 1.5 | +900 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 980 | MLB | Bryce Eldridge 10 games | SF vs MIL@SFG | RBI | 0.5 | +220 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 981 | MLB | Bryce Eldridge 10 games | SF vs MIL@SFG | TB | 1.5 | +165 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.7 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 982 | MLB | Bryce Harper 10 games | PHI vs PHI@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 983 | MLB | Cal Raleigh 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | H | 1.5 | +360 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.2 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 984 | MLB | Cal Raleigh 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | HR | 0.5 | +325 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 985 | MLB | Cal Raleigh 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | R | 0.5 | +115 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 986 | MLB | Cal Raleigh 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | RBI | 0.5 | +163 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 987 | MLB | Cal Raleigh 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | TB | 1.5 | +145 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 988 | MLB | Cam Smith 10 games | HOU vs HOU@LAA | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 989 | MLB | Carson Benge 10 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 990 | MLB | Carson Benge 10 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 991 | MLB | Carson Kelly 10 games | CHC vs CHC@STL | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 992 | MLB | Casey Schmitt 10 games | SF vs MIL@SFG | H | 1.5 | +280 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +-0 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 993 | MLB | Casey Schmitt 10 games | SF vs MIL@SFG | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 994 | MLB | Chadwick Tromp 10 games | BAL vs BAL@DET | HR | 0.5 | +900 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 995 | MLB | Chase DeLauter 10 games | CLE vs CLE@CIN | H | 1.5 | +260 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.8 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 996 | MLB | Chase DeLauter 10 games | CLE vs CLE@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 997 | MLB | Chase DeLauter 10 games | CLE vs CLE@CIN | RBI | 0.5 | +167 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 998 | MLB | Christian Walker 10 games | HOU vs HOU@LAA | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 999 | MLB | Colby Thomas 10 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1000 | MLB | Colby Thomas 10 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | R | 0.5 | +175 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.