Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1401 | MLB | James Jarvis 10 games | vs ATL@NYM | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1402 | MLB | James Outman 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1403 | MLB | Jared Young 10 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1404 | MLB | Jared Young 10 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1405 | MLB | Jarren Duran 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | R | 1.5 | +600 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.4 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1406 | MLB | Javier Sanoja 10 games | MIA vs PHI@MIA | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1407 | MLB | Javier Sanoja 10 games | MIA vs PHI@MIA | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1408 | MLB | JJ Bleday 10 games | CIN vs CLE@CIN | R | 1.5 | +700 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1409 | MLB | JJ Bleday 10 games | CIN vs CLE@CIN | RBI | 1.5 | +450 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1410 | MLB | Joc Pederson 10 games | TEX vs SEA@TEX | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1411 | MLB | Jonah Heim 10 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.2 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1412 | MLB | Jonah Heim 10 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1413 | MLB | Jorge Polanco 10 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | H | 1.5 | +450 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1414 | MLB | Jorge Polanco 10 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.2 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1415 | MLB | Jorge Polanco 10 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1416 | MLB | Jorge Polanco 10 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | TB | 1.5 | +210 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1417 | MLB | Jose Altuve 10 games | HOU vs HOU@LAA | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1418 | MLB | Jose Altuve 10 games | HOU vs HOU@LAA | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1419 | MLB | Josh Lowe 10 games | LAA vs HOU@LAA | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1420 | MLB | Josh Lowe 10 games | LAA vs HOU@LAA | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1421 | MLB | Josh Naylor 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1422 | MLB | Josh Smith 10 games | TEX vs SEA@TEX | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1423 | MLB | Josh Smith 10 games | TEX vs SEA@TEX | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1424 | MLB | Julio Rodriguez 5 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | R | 1.5 | +600 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1425 | MLB | Justin Crawford 10 games | PHI vs PHI@MIA | H | 1.5 | +300 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1426 | MLB | Justin Crawford 10 games | PHI vs PHI@MIA | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1427 | MLB | Justin Crawford 10 games | PHI vs PHI@MIA | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1428 | MLB | Kerry Carpenter 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.2 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1429 | MLB | Kerry Carpenter 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | RBI | 1.5 | +500 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1430 | MLB | Kevin McGonigle 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | R | 1.5 | +600 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1431 | MLB | Kevin McGonigle 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1432 | MLB | Kyle Bradish 9 games | BAL vs BAL@DET | K | 6.5 | +190 | 5 | -1.5 | 1/5 | -0.8 | 26 | F | 4.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1433 | MLB | Kyle Schwarber 10 games | PHI vs PHI@MIA | RBI | 1.5 | +400 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1434 | MLB | Kyle Stowers 10 games | MIA vs PHI@MIA | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1435 | MLB | LaMonte Wade Jr. 10 games | HOU vs HOU@LAA | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1436 | MLB | LaMonte Wade Jr. 10 games | HOU vs HOU@LAA | TB | 1.5 | +240 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.4 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1437 | MLB | Leody Taveras 10 games | BAL vs BAL@DET | H | 1.5 | +300 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1438 | MLB | Leody Taveras 10 games | BAL vs BAL@DET | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1439 | MLB | Leody Taveras 10 games | BAL vs BAL@DET | RBI | 0.5 | +233 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 26 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1440 | MLB | Liam Hicks 10 games | MIA vs PHI@MIA | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1441 | MLB | Liam Hicks 10 games | MIA vs PHI@MIA | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1442 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs HOU@LAA | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1443 | MLB | Logan O'Hoppe 10 games | LAA vs HOU@LAA | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1444 | MLB | Lucas Spence 8 games | HOU vs HOU@LAA | H | 1.5 | +400 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1445 | MLB | Lucas Spence 8 games | HOU vs HOU@LAA | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1446 | MLB | Lucas Spence 8 games | HOU vs HOU@LAA | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1447 | MLB | Luis Robert Jr. 6 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | H | 1.5 | +280 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1448 | MLB | Luis Robert Jr. 6 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | RBI | 1.5 | +500 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1449 | MLB | Luke Raley 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | H | 1.5 | +450 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1450 | MLB | Luke Raley 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.