Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1501 | MLB | William Contreras 10 games | MIL vs MIL@SFG | RBI | 1.5 | +475 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1502 | MLB | Willson Contreras 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | TB | 2.5 | +180 | 1.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | -1.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1503 | MLB | Wilyer Abreu 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | R | 1.5 | +400 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | -0.7 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1504 | MLB | Wilyer Abreu 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | RBI | 1.5 | +360 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1505 | MLB | Xavier Edwards 10 games | MIA vs PHI@MIA | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1506 | MLB | Xavier Edwards 10 games | MIA vs PHI@MIA | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1507 | MLB | Yainer Diaz 10 games | HOU vs HOU@LAA | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1508 | MLB | Yainer Diaz 10 games | HOU vs HOU@LAA | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1509 | MLB | Yainer Diaz 10 games | HOU vs HOU@LAA | TB | 1.5 | +160 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.9 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1510 | MLB | Yordan Alvarez 10 games | HOU vs HOU@LAA | RBI | 1.5 | +360 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | -0.7 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1511 | MLB | Yordan Alvarez 10 games | HOU vs HOU@LAA | TB | 2.5 | +170 | 1.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -2.2 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1512 | MLB | Zach McKinstry 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1513 | MLB | Zach McKinstry 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1514 | MLB | Zach Neto 10 games | LAA vs HOU@LAA | R | 1.5 | +700 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1515 | MLB | Zach Neto 10 games | LAA vs HOU@LAA | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1516 | MLB | Colton Cowser 10 games | BAL vs BAL@DET | H | 0.5 | -139 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 25 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1517 | MLB | Eric Wagaman 10 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | H | 0.5 | -140 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 25 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1518 | MLB | Henry Bolte 10 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | H | 0.5 | -147 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 25 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1519 | MLB | Jacob Wilson 10 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | H | 0.5 | -350 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | -1.1 | 25 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1520 | MLB | Jorge Mateo 9 games | ATL vs ATL@NYM | H | 0.5 | -145 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 25 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1521 | MLB | Myles Straw 10 games | TOR vs TOR@WSN | H | 0.5 | -145 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 25 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1522 | MLB | Travis Bazzana 10 games | CLE vs CLE@CIN | H | 0.5 | -145 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 25 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1523 | MLB | Tyler Callihan 10 games | PIT vs ARI@PIT | H | 0.5 | -148 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 25 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1524 | MLB | James Jarvis 10 games | vs ATL@NYM | H | 0.5 | -125 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.7 | 24 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1525 | MLB | Wilyer Abreu 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | R | 0.5 | -130 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.7 | 24 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1526 | MLB | Amed Rosario 10 games | NYY vs NYY@CHW | H | 0.5 | -220 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0.1 | 23 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1527 | MLB | Cal Raleigh 10 games | SEA vs SEA@TEX | RBI | 1.5 | +475 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1528 | MLB | Carson Kelly 10 games | CHC vs CHC@STL | H | 0.5 | -237 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 23 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1529 | MLB | Carson Kelly 10 games | CHC vs CHC@STL | TB | 1.5 | +130 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.7 | 23 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1530 | MLB | Chase Burns 8 games | CIN vs CLE@CIN | K | 7.5 | +210 | 5.8 | -1.7 | 1/5 | -2.5 | 23 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1531 | MLB | Dillon Dingler 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1532 | MLB | Drake Baldwin 10 games | ATL vs ATL@NYM | RBI | 1.5 | +500 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.7 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1533 | MLB | Edgar Quero 10 games | CWS vs NYY@CHW | H | 0.5 | -155 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 23 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1534 | MLB | Geraldo Perdomo 10 games | AZ vs ARI@PIT | H | 0.5 | -225 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 23 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1535 | MLB | Gleyber Torres 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | TB | 1.5 | +170 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.8 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1536 | MLB | Heliot Ramos 10 games | SF vs MIL@SFG | TB | 1.5 | +150 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1537 | MLB | Jacob Wilson 10 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | H | 1.5 | +160 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -1.1 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1538 | MLB | Jacob Wilson 10 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | TB | 2.5 | +240 | 1 | -1.5 | 1/5 | -2 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1539 | MLB | Jake Mangum 10 games | PIT vs ARI@PIT | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1540 | MLB | Justin Crawford 10 games | PHI vs PHI@MIA | TB | 1.5 | +180 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1541 | MLB | Leody Taveras 10 games | BAL vs BAL@DET | H | 0.5 | -165 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 23 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1542 | MLB | Leody Taveras 10 games | BAL vs BAL@DET | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1543 | MLB | Leody Taveras 10 games | BAL vs BAL@DET | TB | 1.5 | +150 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.8 | 23 | F | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1544 | MLB | Liam Hicks 10 games | MIA vs PHI@MIA | H | 1.5 | +360 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1545 | MLB | Liam Hicks 10 games | MIA vs PHI@MIA | TB | 1.5 | +200 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.9 | 23 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1546 | MLB | Masataka Yoshida 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | RBI | 1.5 | +500 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1547 | MLB | Masataka Yoshida 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | TB | 1.5 | +110 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -1 | 23 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1548 | MLB | Masataka Yoshida 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | TB | 2.5 | +220 | 0.4 | -2.1 | 0/5 | -1 | 23 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1549 | MLB | Max Kepler 10 games | AZ vs ARI@PIT | H | 0.5 | -180 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 23 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1550 | MLB | Max Kepler 10 games | AZ vs ARI@PIT | RBI | 1.5 | +500 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.