Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | MLB | Gleyber Torres 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | H | 1.5 | +230 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1852 | MLB | Gleyber Torres 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | TB | 1.5 | +145 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.7 | 23 | F | 6.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1853 | MLB | Henry Bolte 10 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | H | 0.5 | -184 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 23 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1854 | MLB | Jac Caglianone 10 games | KC vs KCR@MIN | H | 1.5 | +230 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1855 | MLB | Jac Caglianone 10 games | KC vs KCR@MIN | TB | 1.5 | +120 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -1.1 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1856 | MLB | Jacob Wilson 10 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | H | 1.5 | +147 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -1 | 23 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1857 | MLB | James Jarvis 10 games | vs ATL@NYM | TB | 1.5 | +240 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.8 | 23 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1858 | MLB | Josh Bell 10 games | MIN vs KCR@MIN | H | 1.5 | +240 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.7 | 23 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1859 | MLB | Junior Caminero 10 games | TB vs TEX@TBR | TB | 2.5 | +140 | 1 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.9 | 23 | F | 5.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1860 | MLB | Leody Taveras 10 games | BAL vs BAL@DET | H | 0.5 | -165 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1861 | MLB | Luke Keaschall 10 games | MIN vs KCR@MIN | H | 1.5 | +300 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1862 | MLB | Luke Keaschall 10 games | MIN vs KCR@MIN | TB | 1.5 | +170 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1863 | MLB | Mike Yastrzemski 10 games | ATL vs ATL@NYM | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1864 | MLB | Mike Yastrzemski 10 games | ATL vs ATL@NYM | TB | 1.5 | +200 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.8 | 23 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1865 | MLB | Mookie Betts 10 games | LAD vs SEA@LAD | TB | 1.5 | +130 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1866 | MLB | Nathan Church 10 games | STL vs CHC@STL | H | 0.5 | -165 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | +0 | 23 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1867 | MLB | Nick Kurtz 10 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | H | 0.5 | -190 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.2 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1868 | MLB | Nolan Arenado 10 games | AZ vs ARI@PIT | TB | 1.5 | +150 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | -1.6 | 23 | F | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1869 | MLB | Petey Halpin 10 games | CLE vs CLE@CIN | H | 1.5 | +550 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.7 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1870 | MLB | Petey Halpin 10 games | CLE vs CLE@CIN | TB | 1.5 | +220 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -1.5 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1871 | MLB | Travis Bazzana 10 games | CLE vs CLE@CIN | H | 0.5 | -165 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.1 | 23 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1872 | MLB | Tyler Callihan 10 games | PIT vs ARI@PIT | TB | 1.5 | +200 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1873 | MLB | Willson Contreras 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | H | 1.5 | +190 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.8 | 23 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1874 | MLB | Wilyer Abreu 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | H | 0.5 | -240 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.4 | 23 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1875 | MLB | Yandy Diaz 10 games | TB vs TEX@TBR | TB | 2.5 | +220 | 0.6 | -1.9 | 0/5 | -0.9 | 23 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1876 | MLB | Brandon Pfaadt 7 games | AZ vs ARI@PIT | K | 3.5 | -146 | 2.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 22 | F | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1877 | MLB | Bryce Eldridge 10 games | SF vs MIL@SFG | H | 0.5 | -138 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 22 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1878 | MLB | Byron Buxton 10 games | MIN vs KCR@MIN | TB | 1.5 | -102 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.7 | 22 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1879 | MLB | Shohei Ohtani 10 games | LAD vs SEA@LAD | R | 0.5 | -145 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 22 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1880 | MLB | Trent Grisham 10 games | NYY vs NYY@CHW | H | 0.5 | -140 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 22 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1881 | MLB | Nolan Arenado 10 games | AZ vs ARI@PIT | H | 0.5 | -180 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.8 | 20 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1882 | MLB | Garrett Mitchell 10 games | MIL vs MIL@SFG | H | 0.5 | -140 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.8 | 19 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1883 | MLB | Jacob Wilson 10 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | TB | 1.5 | -101 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -1.9 | 19 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1884 | MLB | Jac Caglianone 10 games | KC vs KCR@MIN | H | 0.5 | -210 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 17 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1885 | MLB | Aaron Nola | PHI vs PHI@MIA | Outs | 16.5 | -115 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1886 | MLB | Aaron Nola | PHI vs PHI@MIA | Outs | 17.5 | -110 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1887 | MLB | Ali Sanchez | NYY vs NYY@CHW | H | 0.5 | -115 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1888 | MLB | Ali Sanchez | NYY vs NYY@CHW | H | 1.5 | +500 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1889 | MLB | Ali Sanchez | NYY vs NYY@CHW | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1890 | MLB | Ali Sanchez | NYY vs NYY@CHW | R | 0.5 | +190 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1891 | MLB | Ali Sanchez | NYY vs NYY@CHW | R | 1.5 | +2000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1892 | MLB | Ali Sanchez | NYY vs NYY@CHW | RBI | 0.5 | +240 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1893 | MLB | Ali Sanchez | NYY vs NYY@CHW | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1894 | MLB | Ali Sanchez | NYY vs NYY@CHW | TB | 1.5 | +280 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1895 | MLB | Andres Gimenez | TOR vs TOR@WSN | H | 0.5 | -150 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1896 | MLB | Andres Gimenez | TOR vs TOR@WSN | H | 1.5 | +340 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1897 | MLB | Andres Gimenez | TOR vs TOR@WSN | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1898 | MLB | Andres Gimenez | TOR vs TOR@WSN | R | 0.5 | +170 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1899 | MLB | Andres Gimenez | TOR vs TOR@WSN | R | 1.5 | +1300 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1900 | MLB | Andres Gimenez | TOR vs TOR@WSN | RBI | 0.5 | +263 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.