Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1251 | MLB | Bryce Eldridge 10 games | SF vs MIL@SFG | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1252 | MLB | Bryce Eldridge 10 games | SF vs MIL@SFG | RBI | 0.5 | +231 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1253 | MLB | Byron Buxton 10 games | MIN vs KCR@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +300 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1254 | MLB | Byron Buxton 10 games | MIN vs KCR@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +140 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1255 | MLB | Cal Quantrill 10 games | TEX vs TEX@TBR | K | 3.5 | +165 | 2.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | +-0 | 29 | F | 7.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1256 | MLB | Cal Raleigh 10 games | SEA vs SEA@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +300 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1257 | MLB | Cal Raleigh 10 games | SEA vs SEA@LAD | R | 0.5 | +135 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1258 | MLB | Cal Raleigh 10 games | SEA vs SEA@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +175 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1259 | MLB | Cal Raleigh 10 games | SEA vs SEA@LAD | TB | 1.5 | +130 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1260 | MLB | Caleb Durbin 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | HR | 0.5 | +700 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1261 | MLB | Caleb Durbin 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | RBI | 0.5 | +169 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1262 | MLB | Carson Benge 10 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1263 | MLB | Carson Benge 10 games | NYM vs ATL@NYM | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1264 | MLB | Carson Kelly 10 games | CHC vs CHC@STL | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1265 | MLB | Carter Jensen 10 games | KC vs KCR@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +350 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1266 | MLB | Carter Jensen 10 games | KC vs KCR@MIN | R | 0.5 | +115 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1267 | MLB | Carter Jensen 10 games | KC vs KCR@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +200 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1268 | MLB | Cedric Mullins 10 games | TB vs TEX@TBR | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1269 | MLB | Chadwick Tromp 10 games | BAL vs BAL@DET | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1270 | MLB | Chadwick Tromp 10 games | BAL vs BAL@DET | R | 0.5 | +220 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1271 | MLB | Chadwick Tromp 10 games | BAL vs BAL@DET | RBI | 0.5 | +322 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1272 | MLB | Chandler Simpson 10 games | TB vs TEX@TBR | HR | 0.5 | +1600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1273 | MLB | Chandler Simpson 10 games | TB vs TEX@TBR | R | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1274 | MLB | Chase DeLauter 10 games | CLE vs CLE@CIN | H | 1.5 | +240 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.8 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1275 | MLB | Chase DeLauter 10 games | CLE vs CLE@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1276 | MLB | Chase DeLauter 10 games | CLE vs CLE@CIN | RBI | 0.5 | +179 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1277 | MLB | Chase Meidroth 10 games | CWS vs NYY@CHW | R | 1.5 | +2000 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1278 | MLB | Christian Koss 4 games | SF vs MIL@SFG | HR | 0.5 | +1400 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/4 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1279 | MLB | Christian Koss 4 games | SF vs MIL@SFG | R | 0.5 | +240 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/4 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1280 | MLB | Christian Koss 4 games | SF vs MIL@SFG | RBI | 0.5 | +341 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/4 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1281 | MLB | Christian Walker 10 games | HOU vs HOU@LAA | HR | 0.5 | +400 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1282 | MLB | Colby Thomas 10 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1283 | MLB | Colby Thomas 10 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | R | 0.5 | +170 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1284 | MLB | Colby Thomas 10 games | ATH vs BOS@Athlet | RBI | 0.5 | +238 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1285 | MLB | Cole Young 10 games | SEA vs SEA@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1286 | MLB | Cole Young 10 games | SEA vs SEA@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +230 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1287 | MLB | Colson Montgomery 10 games | CWS vs NYY@CHW | HR | 0.5 | +300 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1288 | MLB | Colt Emerson 10 games | SEA vs SEA@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1289 | MLB | Colt Emerson 10 games | SEA vs SEA@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +300 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1290 | MLB | Colt Keith 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | HR | 0.5 | +525 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1291 | MLB | Colt Keith 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | R | 1.5 | +550 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +0.2 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1292 | MLB | Colt Keith 10 games | DET vs BAL@DET | RBI | 0.5 | +207 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1293 | MLB | Colton Cowser 10 games | BAL vs BAL@DET | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1294 | MLB | Colton Cowser 10 games | BAL vs BAL@DET | R | 0.5 | +145 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1295 | MLB | Colton Cowser 10 games | BAL vs BAL@DET | RBI | 0.5 | +214 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1296 | MLB | Corbin Carroll 10 games | AZ vs ARI@PIT | H | 1.5 | +220 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1297 | MLB | Corbin Carroll 10 games | AZ vs ARI@PIT | HR | 0.5 | +400 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1298 | MLB | Curtis Mead 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | H | 1.5 | +188 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -1.1 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1299 | MLB | Curtis Mead 10 games | BOS vs BOS@Athlet | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1300 | MLB | Dane Myers 10 games | CIN vs CLE@CIN | HR | 0.5 | +650 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.