Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51 | MLB | Dillon Dingler 10 games | DET vs DET@SEA | H | 1.5 | +260 | 1.8 | +0.3 | 4/5 | +0.7 | 58 | D | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 52 | MLB | Dylan Cease 10 games | TOR vs TOR@CHC | K | 6.5 | -240 | 8 | +1.5 | 4/5 | +0.2 | 58 | D | 10.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 53 | MLB | Geraldo Perdomo 10 games | AZ vs SDP@ARI | TB | 1.5 | +145 | 2.6 | +1.1 | 3/5 | -0.6 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 54 | MLB | Janson Junk 4 games | MIA vs MIA@ATL | K | 3.5 | -111 | 4.5 | +1 | 3/4 | -0.2 | 58 | D | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 55 | MLB | Josh Bell 10 games | MIN vs MIN@KCR | R | 0.5 | +130 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 4/5 | +0.5 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 56 | MLB | Masataka Yoshida 10 games | BOS vs CHW@BOS | TB | 1.5 | +122 | 2 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +1.4 | 58 | D | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 57 | MLB | Nathaniel Lowe 10 games | CLE vs NYM@CLE | RBI | 0.5 | +225 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.5 | 58 | D | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 58 | MLB | Nathaniel Lowe 10 games | CLE vs NYM@CLE | TB | 1.5 | +180 | 2.2 | +0.7 | 3/5 | +0.9 | 58 | D | 5.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 59 | MLB | Nico Hoerner 10 games | CHC vs TOR@CHC | H | 0.5 | -163 | 1.6 | +1.1 | 4/5 | +0.1 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 60 | MLB | Pete Crow-Armstrong 10 games | CHC vs TOR@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +215 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 3/5 | +0.8 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 61 | MLB | Sal Stewart 10 games | CIN vs Athletics@ | R | 0.5 | -120 | 1 | +0.5 | 4/5 | +0.4 | 58 | D | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 62 | MLB | Salvador Perez 10 games | KC vs MIN@KCR | TB | 1.5 | +121 | 2 | +0.5 | 4/5 | -0.7 | 58 | D | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 63 | MLB | Tim Tawa 10 games | AZ vs SDP@ARI | R | 0.5 | +155 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +1 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 64 | MLB | Wade Meckler 10 games | LAA vs LAA@BAL | TB | 1.5 | +190 | 2 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +1.1 | 58 | D | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 65 | MLB | Alec Bohm 10 games | PHI vs WSN@PHI | H | 0.5 | -275 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 5/5 | -0.1 | 56 | D | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 66 | MLB | Andruw Monasterio 10 games | BOS vs CHW@BOS | H | 0.5 | -182 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 5/5 | +0.1 | 56 | D | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 67 | MLB | Jake Bauers 10 games | MIL vs PIT@MIL | H | 0.5 | -155 | 1.4 | +0.9 | 5/5 | -0.3 | 56 | D | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 68 | MLB | Andruw Monasterio 10 games | BOS vs CHW@BOS | RBI | 0.5 | +185 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.2 | 55 | D | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 69 | MLB | Austin Riley 10 games | ATL vs MIA@ATL | RBI | 0.5 | +200 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.3 | 55 | D | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 70 | MLB | Cal Raleigh 10 games | SEA vs DET@SEA | RBI | 0.5 | +180 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 3/5 | +0.2 | 55 | D | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 71 | MLB | Caleb Durbin 10 games | BOS vs CHW@BOS | R | 0.5 | +130 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.2 | 55 | D | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 72 | MLB | Ceddanne Rafaela 10 games | BOS vs CHW@BOS | R | 1.5 | +500 | 1.6 | +0.1 | 4/5 | +0.4 | 55 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 73 | MLB | Dansby Swanson 10 games | CHC vs TOR@CHC | H | 0.5 | -112 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 3/5 | +1.1 | 55 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 74 | MLB | Dillon Dingler 10 games | DET vs DET@SEA | RBI | 0.5 | +186 | 1.4 | +0.9 | 3/5 | +0.1 | 55 | D | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 75 | MLB | Geraldo Perdomo 10 games | AZ vs SDP@ARI | H | 1.5 | +260 | 2 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.2 | 55 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 76 | MLB | Gleyber Torres 10 games | DET vs DET@SEA | RBI | 0.5 | +257 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 3/5 | +0.2 | 55 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 77 | MLB | Jackson Chourio 10 games | MIL vs PIT@MIL | TB | 1.5 | +121 | 2 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.2 | 55 | D | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 78 | MLB | Jackson Merrill 10 games | SD vs SDP@ARI | RBI | 0.5 | +176 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 3/5 | -0.2 | 55 | D | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 79 | MLB | Justin Crawford 10 games | PHI vs WSN@PHI | RBI | 0.5 | +209 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.4 | 55 | D | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 80 | MLB | Kevin McGonigle 10 games | DET vs DET@SEA | RBI | 0.5 | +220 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | -0.4 | 55 | D | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 81 | MLB | Michael Busch 10 games | CHC vs TOR@CHC | RBI | 0.5 | +237 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.3 | 55 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 82 | MLB | Michael Harris II 10 games | ATL vs MIA@ATL | TB | 1.5 | +100 | 2 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.3 | 55 | D | 6.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 83 | MLB | Miguel Vargas 10 games | CWS vs CHW@BOS | TB | 1.5 | +121 | 2 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.2 | 55 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 84 | MLB | Mike Yastrzemski 10 games | ATL vs MIA@ATL | TB | 1.5 | +165 | 2.4 | +0.9 | 3/5 | -0.1 | 55 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 85 | MLB | Myles Straw 10 games | TOR vs TOR@CHC | H | 0.5 | -154 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 4/5 | +0.9 | 55 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 86 | MLB | Nolan McLean 10 games | NYM vs NYM@CLE | K | 6.5 | +140 | 7 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.2 | 55 | D | 8.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 87 | MLB | Patrick Bailey 10 games | CLE vs NYM@CLE | RBI | 0.5 | +300 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 4/5 | +0.2 | 55 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 88 | MLB | Pete Crow-Armstrong 10 games | CHC vs TOR@CHC | H | 0.5 | -168 | 1.4 | +0.9 | 4/5 | +1 | 55 | D | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 89 | MLB | Sal Stewart 10 games | CIN vs Athletics@ | RBI | 0.5 | +146 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 3/5 | -0.1 | 55 | D | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 90 | MLB | Seiya Suzuki 10 games | CHC vs TOR@CHC | TB | 1.5 | +180 | 2.2 | +0.7 | 3/5 | +0.1 | 55 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 91 | MLB | Wade Meckler 10 games | LAA vs LAA@BAL | H | 0.5 | -180 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 4/5 | +0.5 | 55 | D | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 92 | MLB | Wilyer Abreu 10 games | BOS vs CHW@BOS | H | 0.5 | -300 | 1.4 | +0.9 | 4/5 | +1 | 55 | D | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 93 | MLB | Zach McKinstry 10 games | DET vs DET@SEA | R | 0.5 | +190 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 4/5 | +-0 | 55 | D | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 94 | MLB | Matt Olson 10 games | ATL vs MIA@ATL | R | 0.5 | -110 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | -0.5 | 54 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 95 | MLB | Michael Busch 10 games | CHC vs TOR@CHC | H | 0.5 | -144 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 4/5 | +0.4 | 54 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 96 | MLB | Zach McKinstry 10 games | DET vs DET@SEA | H | 0.5 | -125 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 3/5 | +0.6 | 53 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 97 | MLB | A.J. Ewing 10 games | NYM vs NYM@CLE | H | 0.5 | -210 | 1 | +0.5 | 4/5 | +0 | 52 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 98 | MLB | Andrew Vaughn 10 games | MIL vs PIT@MIL | RBI | 0.5 | +211 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | +0.7 | 52 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 99 | MLB | Austin Riley 10 games | ATL vs MIA@ATL | H | 1.5 | +280 | 1.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0.6 | 52 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 100 | MLB | Austin Riley 10 games | ATL vs MIA@ATL | R | 0.5 | +140 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0.7 | 52 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.