Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51 | MLB | Dylan Cease 10 games | TOR vs BOS@TOR | K | 6.5 | -350 | 7.8 | +1.3 | 4/5 | +1.3 | 61 | D | 7.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 52 | MLB | Fernando Tatis Jr. 10 games | SD vs MIL@SDP | R | 0.5 | +120 | 1 | +0.5 | 4/5 | -0.3 | 61 | D | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 53 | MLB | Fernando Tatis Jr. 10 games | SD vs MIL@SDP | TB | 1.5 | +142 | 2.8 | +1.3 | 3/5 | +0.1 | 61 | D | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 54 | MLB | Jackson Holliday 10 games | BAL vs BAL@MIN | TB | 1.5 | +129 | 2.2 | +0.7 | 3/5 | +2.5 | 61 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 55 | MLB | Javier Sanoja 10 games | MIA vs PIT@MIA | TB | 1.5 | +220 | 2 | +0.5 | 4/5 | +0.2 | 61 | D | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 56 | MLB | Matt Olson 10 games | ATL vs NYM@ATL | R | 0.5 | +105 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 4/5 | -0.4 | 61 | D | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 57 | MLB | Michael Busch 10 games | CHC vs CHC@WSN | H | 0.5 | -250 | 1.6 | +1.1 | 4/5 | +0.8 | 61 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 58 | MLB | Patrick Sandoval 5 games | BOS vs BOS@TOR | K | 4.5 | +124 | 5 | +0.5 | 4/5 | +0 | 61 | D | 4.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 59 | MLB | Royce Lewis 10 games | MIN vs BAL@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +165 | 1 | +0.5 | 4/5 | +0.1 | 61 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 60 | MLB | Wilyer Abreu 10 games | BOS vs BOS@TOR | RBI | 0.5 | +220 | 1.4 | +0.9 | 4/5 | +0.2 | 61 | D | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 61 | MLB | Chase Meidroth 10 games | CWS vs CIN@CHW | TB | 1.5 | +141 | 2.6 | +1.1 | 2/5 | +2.3 | 60 | D | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 62 | MLB | Colton Cowser 10 games | BAL vs BAL@MIN | H | 0.5 | -133 | 1 | +0.5 | 4/5 | +0.6 | 59 | D | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 63 | MLB | Pete Alonso 10 games | BAL vs BAL@MIN | TB | 1.5 | -104 | 2.6 | +1.1 | 2/5 | +2 | 59 | D | 6.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 64 | MLB | A.J. Ewing 10 games | NYM vs NYM@ATL | R | 0.5 | +115 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.5 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 65 | MLB | Andrés Chaparro 10 games | WSH vs CHC@WSN | RBI | 0.5 | +241 | 1.4 | +0.9 | 3/5 | +0.8 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 66 | MLB | Andrew Pinckney 1 games | WSH vs CHC@WSN | H | 0.5 | -142 | 1 | +0.5 | 1/1 | +0 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 67 | MLB | Bo Bichette 10 games | NYM vs NYM@ATL | RBI | 0.5 | +194 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.6 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 68 | MLB | Brandon Nimmo 10 games | TEX vs TEX@LAA | RBI | 0.5 | +130 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 3/5 | +0.5 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 69 | MLB | Cam Smith 10 games | HOU vs HOU@SFG | H | 0.5 | -190 | 1.8 | +1.3 | 4/5 | +0.4 | 58 | D | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 70 | MLB | Cam Smith 10 games | HOU vs HOU@SFG | RBI | 0.5 | +195 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.5 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 71 | MLB | Carson Benge 10 games | NYM vs NYM@ATL | H | 0.5 | -185 | 1.6 | +1.1 | 4/5 | -0.1 | 58 | D | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 72 | MLB | Chandler Simpson 10 games | TB vs TBR@Athlet | TB | 1.5 | +110 | 2 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +1.1 | 58 | D | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 73 | MLB | Christian Yelich 10 games | MIL vs MIL@SDP | R | 0.5 | +155 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 4/5 | +0.6 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 74 | MLB | Coby Mayo 10 games | BAL vs BAL@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +190 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.6 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 75 | MLB | Cody Bradford 1 games | TEX vs TEX@LAA | K | 4.5 | -146 | 5 | +0.5 | 1/1 | +0 | 58 | D | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 76 | MLB | Daylen Lile 10 games | WSH vs CHC@WSN | RBI | 0.5 | +203 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +1 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 77 | MLB | Dillon Dingler 10 games | DET vs CLE@DET | RBI | 0.5 | +152 | 1.4 | +0.9 | 4/5 | -0.5 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 78 | MLB | Griffin Conine 10 games | MIA vs PIT@MIA | RBI | 0.5 | +271 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.7 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 79 | MLB | Henry Bolte 10 games | ATH vs TBR@Athlet | TB | 1.5 | +145 | 2 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.9 | 58 | D | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 80 | MLB | Jake Mangum 10 games | PIT vs PIT@MIA | TB | 1.5 | +140 | 2.4 | +0.9 | 3/5 | +1.2 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 81 | MLB | Jake McCarthy 10 games | COL vs COL@ARI | H | 1.5 | +180 | 2.2 | +0.7 | 3/5 | +0.5 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 82 | MLB | Javier Sanoja 10 games | MIA vs PIT@MIA | H | 0.5 | -146 | 1.4 | +0.9 | 5/5 | +0.2 | 58 | D | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 83 | MLB | Jordan Walker 10 games | STL vs PHI@STL | TB | 1.5 | +120 | 2 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.6 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 84 | MLB | Josh Bell 10 games | MIN vs BAL@MIN | H | 0.5 | -235 | 1.6 | +1.1 | 4/5 | -0.3 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 85 | MLB | Kyle Schwarber 10 games | PHI vs PHI@STL | RBI | 0.5 | +147 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 3/5 | +1 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 86 | MLB | Michael Busch 10 games | CHC vs CHC@WSN | TB | 1.5 | +105 | 2 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +0.6 | 58 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 87 | MLB | Munetaka Murakami 10 games | CWS vs CIN@CHW | TB | 1.5 | +140 | 2 | +0.5 | 3/5 | +1.3 | 58 | D | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 88 | MLB | Patrick Sandoval 5 games | BOS vs BOS@TOR | K | 3.5 | -215 | 5 | +1.5 | 4/5 | +0 | 58 | D | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 89 | MLB | Royce Lewis 10 games | MIN vs BAL@MIN | TB | 1.5 | +135 | 2.4 | +0.9 | 4/5 | -1.2 | 58 | D | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 90 | MLB | Andrés Chaparro 10 games | WSH vs CHC@WSN | H | 0.5 | -145 | 1 | +0.5 | 4/5 | +0.7 | 57 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 91 | MLB | Francisco Lindor 10 games | NYM vs NYM@ATL | TB | 1.5 | +114 | 3 | +1.5 | 2/5 | +0.6 | 57 | D | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 92 | MLB | Jared Young 10 games | NYM vs NYM@ATL | H | 0.5 | -140 | 1.4 | +0.9 | 4/5 | +0.6 | 57 | D | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 93 | MLB | Tanner Bibee 10 games | CLE vs CLE@DET | K | 4.5 | -105 | 5.2 | +0.7 | 3/5 | +1.3 | 57 | D | 4.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 94 | MLB | Blaze Jordan 10 games | STL vs PHI@STL | H | 0.5 | -185 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 5/5 | +0.3 | 56 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 95 | MLB | Jackson Merrill 10 games | SD vs MIL@SDP | H | 0.5 | -157 | 1.4 | +0.9 | 5/5 | -0.1 | 56 | D | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 96 | MLB | Jordan Walker 10 games | STL vs PHI@STL | H | 0.5 | -258 | 1.4 | +0.9 | 5/5 | -0.1 | 56 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 97 | MLB | Justin Crawford 10 games | PHI vs PHI@STL | H | 0.5 | -172 | 1 | +0.5 | 5/5 | -0.1 | 56 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 98 | MLB | Nathan Church 10 games | STL vs PHI@STL | H | 0.5 | -130 | 1.2 | +0.7 | 4/5 | +0 | 56 | D | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 99 | MLB | Tyler Soderstrom 10 games | ATH vs TBR@Athlet | H | 0.5 | -239 | 1 | +0.5 | 5/5 | +0 | 56 | D | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 100 | MLB | Andruw Monasterio 10 games | BOS vs BOS@TOR | RBI | 0.5 | +280 | 1 | +0.5 | 3/5 | -0.3 | 55 | D | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.