Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1101 | MLB | Christian Walker 10 games | HOU vs HOU@SFG | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1102 | MLB | Christian Walker 10 games | HOU vs HOU@SFG | TB | 1.5 | +133 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -1.4 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1103 | MLB | CJ Abrams 10 games | WSH vs CHC@WSN | HR | 0.5 | +475 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1104 | MLB | Cole Carrigg 10 games | COL vs COL@ARI | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1105 | MLB | Cole Young 10 games | SEA vs SEA@NYY | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1106 | MLB | Cole Young 10 games | SEA vs SEA@NYY | R | 0.5 | +147 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1107 | MLB | Cole Young 10 games | SEA vs SEA@NYY | TB | 1.5 | +155 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1108 | MLB | Colt Emerson 10 games | SEA vs SEA@NYY | H | 1.5 | +500 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1109 | MLB | Colt Emerson 10 games | SEA vs SEA@NYY | TB | 1.5 | +275 | 1.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1110 | MLB | Colt Keith 10 games | DET vs CLE@DET | H | 1.5 | +300 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.9 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1111 | MLB | Colt Keith 10 games | DET vs CLE@DET | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1112 | MLB | Colt Keith 10 games | DET vs CLE@DET | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1113 | MLB | Colt Keith 10 games | DET vs CLE@DET | TB | 1.5 | +160 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -1.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1114 | MLB | Corbin Carroll 10 games | AZ vs COL@ARI | H | 1.5 | +180 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | +-0 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1115 | MLB | Corbin Carroll 10 games | AZ vs COL@ARI | HR | 0.5 | +350 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1116 | MLB | Dane Myers 10 games | CIN vs CIN@CHW | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1117 | MLB | Dane Myers 10 games | CIN vs CIN@CHW | R | 0.5 | +195 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1118 | MLB | Dansby Swanson 10 games | CHC vs CHC@WSN | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1119 | MLB | Dansby Swanson 10 games | CHC vs CHC@WSN | TB | 1.5 | +143 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.9 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1120 | MLB | David Hamilton 10 games | MIL vs MIL@SDP | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1121 | MLB | Dillon Dingler 10 games | DET vs CLE@DET | R | 1.5 | +700 | 0.8 | -0.7 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1122 | MLB | Dominic Canzone 10 games | SEA vs SEA@NYY | HR | 0.5 | +425 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1123 | MLB | Dominic Canzone 10 games | SEA vs SEA@NYY | RBI | 0.5 | +182 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1124 | MLB | Donovan Walton 10 games | ATH vs TBR@Athlet | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1125 | MLB | Donovan Walton 10 games | ATH vs TBR@Athlet | TB | 1.5 | +175 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1126 | MLB | Drake Baldwin 10 games | ATL vs NYM@ATL | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1127 | MLB | Drew Cavanaugh 10 games | SF vs HOU@SFG | HR | 0.5 | +1100 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1128 | MLB | Drew Cavanaugh 10 games | SF vs HOU@SFG | R | 0.5 | +250 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1129 | MLB | Drew Cavanaugh 10 games | SF vs HOU@SFG | TB | 1.5 | +300 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1130 | MLB | Dylan Beavers 10 games | BAL vs BAL@MIN | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1131 | MLB | Dylan Beavers 10 games | BAL vs BAL@MIN | TB | 1.5 | +150 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 1132 | MLB | Dylan Crews 10 games | WSH vs CHC@WSN | HR | 0.5 | +450 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1133 | MLB | Dylan Crews 10 games | WSH vs CHC@WSN | RBI | 0.5 | +197 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1134 | MLB | Edgar Quero 10 games | CWS vs CIN@CHW | HR | 0.5 | +850 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1135 | MLB | Edgar Quero 10 games | CWS vs CIN@CHW | R | 0.5 | +175 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 1136 | MLB | Enmanuel Valdez 10 games | PIT vs PIT@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +500 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1137 | MLB | Enmanuel Valdez 10 games | PIT vs PIT@MIA | R | 0.5 | +160 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1138 | MLB | Enmanuel Valdez 10 games | PIT vs PIT@MIA | RBI | 0.5 | +230 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1139 | MLB | Ernie Clement 10 games | TOR vs BOS@TOR | HR | 0.5 | +1000 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1140 | MLB | Esmerlyn Valdez 10 games | PIT vs PIT@MIA | HR | 0.5 | +575 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1141 | MLB | Esmerlyn Valdez 10 games | PIT vs PIT@MIA | R | 0.5 | +155 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1142 | MLB | Esmerlyn Valdez 10 games | PIT vs PIT@MIA | RBI | 0.5 | +248 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1143 | MLB | Evan Carter 10 games | TEX vs TEX@LAA | HR | 0.5 | +550 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1144 | MLB | Ezequiel Duran 10 games | TEX vs TEX@LAA | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1145 | MLB | Ezequiel Tovar 10 games | COL vs COL@ARI | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1146 | MLB | Ezequiel Tovar 10 games | COL vs COL@ARI | TB | 1.5 | +190 | 1 | -0.5 | 1/5 | -0.9 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1147 | MLB | Freddie Freeman 10 games | LAD vs KCR@LAD | HR | 0.5 | +400 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1148 | MLB | Gabriel Moreno 10 games | AZ vs COL@ARI | HR | 0.5 | +750 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1149 | MLB | Garrett Mitchell 10 games | MIL vs MIL@SDP | HR | 0.5 | +600 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 1150 | MLB | George Springer 10 games | TOR vs BOS@TOR | H | 1.5 | +280 | 0.6 | -0.9 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.