Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 401 | MLB | Michael Harris II 10 games | ATL vs NYM@ATL | R | 0.5 | +140 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 42 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 402 | MLB | Michael Harris II 10 games | ATL vs NYM@ATL | RBI | 0.5 | +155 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.3 | 42 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 403 | MLB | Mike Trout 10 games | LAA vs TEX@LAA | TB | 1.5 | +124 | 1.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 42 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 404 | MLB | Nathaniel Lowe 10 games | CLE vs CLE@DET | R | 0.5 | +140 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0 | 42 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 405 | MLB | Otto Lopez 10 games | MIA vs PIT@MIA | R | 0.5 | +180 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 42 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 406 | MLB | Pete Alonso 10 games | BAL vs BAL@MIN | R | 0.5 | -112 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 2/5 | +0.7 | 42 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 407 | MLB | Ronny Simon 5 games | PIT vs PIT@MIA | R | 0.5 | +225 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 42 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 408 | MLB | Ryan Waldschmidt 10 games | AZ vs COL@ARI | R | 0.5 | +145 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +-0 | 42 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 409 | MLB | Salvador Perez 10 games | KC vs KCR@LAD | H | 0.5 | -144 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.1 | 42 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 410 | MLB | Seiya Suzuki 10 games | CHC vs CHC@WSN | RBI | 0.5 | +154 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 42 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 411 | MLB | Starling Marte 10 games | KC vs KCR@LAD | RBI | 0.5 | +390 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 2/5 | +0.2 | 42 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 412 | MLB | Steven Kwan 10 games | CLE vs CLE@DET | H | 1.5 | +220 | 1.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0.4 | 42 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 413 | MLB | Trea Turner 10 games | PHI vs PHI@STL | TB | 1.5 | +102 | 1.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.4 | 42 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 414 | MLB | Tyler Stephenson 10 games | CIN vs CIN@CHW | RBI | 0.5 | +209 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 42 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 415 | MLB | Wade Meckler 10 games | LAA vs TEX@LAA | R | 0.5 | +140 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 42 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 416 | MLB | William Contreras 10 games | MIL vs MIL@SDP | R | 0.5 | +130 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 42 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 417 | MLB | Willson Contreras 10 games | BOS vs BOS@TOR | R | 0.5 | +160 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 42 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 418 | MLB | Willson Contreras 10 games | BOS vs BOS@TOR | RBI | 0.5 | +240 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.4 | 42 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 419 | MLB | Willy Adames 10 games | SF vs HOU@SFG | H | 0.5 | -150 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0.2 | 42 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 420 | MLB | Yohel Pozo 4 games | BAL vs BAL@MIN | RBI | 0.5 | +285 | 0.5 | +0 | 2/4 | +0.2 | 42 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 421 | MLB | Zach Neto 10 games | LAA vs TEX@LAA | RBI | 0.5 | +161 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 42 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 422 | MLB | Zack Gelof 10 games | ATH vs TBR@Athlet | R | 0.5 | +137 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 42 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 423 | MLB | Brandon Nimmo 10 games | TEX vs TEX@LAA | R | 0.5 | -110 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 41 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 424 | MLB | Corbin Carroll 10 games | AZ vs COL@ARI | TB | 1.5 | -120 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 3/5 | +0.3 | 41 | F | 4.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 425 | MLB | David Hamilton 10 games | MIL vs MIL@SDP | H | 0.5 | -110 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | -0.2 | 41 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 426 | MLB | Henry Davis 10 games | PIT vs PIT@MIA | H | 0.5 | -103 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +-0 | 41 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 427 | MLB | Joey Ortiz 10 games | MIL vs MIL@SDP | H | 0.5 | -150 | 1 | +0.5 | 2/5 | +0 | 41 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 428 | MLB | Junior Caminero 10 games | TB vs TBR@Athlet | RBI | 0.5 | -110 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 2/5 | +0.1 | 41 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 429 | MLB | Luis Rengifo 10 games | SD vs MIL@SDP | H | 0.5 | -150 | 1 | +0.5 | 2/5 | -0.1 | 41 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 430 | MLB | Michael Busch 10 games | CHC vs CHC@WSN | R | 0.5 | -110 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +0.3 | 41 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 431 | MLB | Trea Turner 10 games | PHI vs PHI@STL | R | 0.5 | -102 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 2/5 | +-0 | 41 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 432 | MLB | Tyler Tolbert 10 games | KC vs KCR@LAD | TB | 1.5 | +300 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 3/5 | -0.6 | 41 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 433 | MLB | Alec Bohm 10 games | PHI vs PHI@STL | H | 0.5 | -220 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | -0.2 | 40 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 434 | MLB | Alec Burleson 10 games | STL vs PHI@STL | H | 0.5 | -200 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | -0.1 | 40 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 435 | MLB | Andrew Vaughn 10 games | MIL vs MIL@SDP | H | 0.5 | -188 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | +0.1 | 40 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 436 | MLB | Brady House 10 games | WSH vs CHC@WSN | H | 0.5 | -167 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.2 | 40 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 437 | MLB | Brandon Lowe 10 games | PIT vs PIT@MIA | H | 0.5 | -154 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.3 | 40 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 438 | MLB | Brandon Marsh 10 games | PHI vs PHI@STL | H | 0.5 | -215 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | -0.2 | 40 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 439 | MLB | Brayan Rocchio 10 games | CLE vs CLE@DET | H | 0.5 | -175 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0.2 | 40 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 440 | MLB | Brenton Doyle 7 games | CWS vs CIN@CHW | H | 0.5 | -155 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | +0.1 | 40 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 441 | MLB | Bryan Reynolds 10 games | PIT vs PIT@MIA | TB | 1.5 | +160 | 1.4 | -0.1 | 2/5 | +0.7 | 40 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 442 | MLB | Cole Young 10 games | SEA vs SEA@NYY | H | 0.5 | -200 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 3/5 | +0 | 40 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 443 | MLB | Corey Seager 10 games | TEX vs TEX@LAA | RBI | 0.5 | +130 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 1/5 | +0.7 | 40 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 444 | MLB | Dylan Beavers 10 games | BAL vs BAL@MIN | H | 0.5 | -167 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.3 | 40 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 445 | MLB | Dylan Cease 10 games | TOR vs BOS@TOR | K | 7.5 | -132 | 7.8 | +0.3 | 2/5 | +1.3 | 40 | F | 7.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 446 | MLB | Dylan Cease 10 games | TOR vs BOS@TOR | K | 8.5 | +135 | 7.8 | -0.7 | 2/5 | +1.3 | 40 | F | 7.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 447 | MLB | Everson Pereira 9 games | STL vs PHI@STL | RBI | 0.5 | +324 | 0.8 | +0.3 | 1/5 | +0.9 | 40 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 448 | MLB | Garrett Mitchell 10 games | MIL vs MIL@SDP | H | 0.5 | -161 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | +0 | 40 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 449 | MLB | George Springer 10 games | TOR vs BOS@TOR | H | 0.5 | -200 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.2 | 40 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 450 | MLB | Gleyber Torres 10 games | DET vs CLE@DET | H | 0.5 | -200 | 0.6 | +0.1 | 3/5 | -0.5 | 40 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.