Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | NFL | Jalen Hurts 10 games | vs PHI@CHI | RUSH YDS | 24.50 | -113 | 24.2 | -0.3 | 2/5 | -1 | 31 | F | 25.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 102 | NFL | Jalen Hurts 10 games | vs PHI@CHI | RUSH YDS | 25.50 | -105 | 24.2 | -1.3 | 2/5 | -1 | 30 | F | 25.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 103 | NFL | Britain Covey 7 games | vs PHI@CHI | ANYTIME TD | 0.50 | +6000 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 104 | NFL | Dontayvion Wicks 10 games | vs PHI@CHI | REC | 3.50 | +130 | 2.2 | -1.3 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 29 | F | 2.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 105 | NFL | E.J. Jenkins 1 games | vs PHI@CHI | ANYTIME TD | 0.50 | +3000 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 106 | NFL | Elijah Moore 7 games | vs PHI@CHI | ANYTIME TD | 0.50 | +4500 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 107 | NFL | Jalen Hurts 10 games | vs PHI@CHI | ANYTIME TD | 0.50 | +155 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 108 | NFL | Johnny Mundt 10 games | vs PHI@CHI | ANYTIME TD | 0.50 | +1400 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 109 | NFL | Luther Burden III 10 games | vs PHI@CHI | ANYTIME TD | 0.50 | +450 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 110 | NFL | Luther Burden III 10 games | vs PHI@CHI | REC | 3.50 | +100 | 3.4 | -0.1 | 1/5 | -0.5 | 29 | F | 7.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 111 | NFL | Makai Lemon 2 games | vs PHI@CHI | ANYTIME TD | 0.50 | +1100 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/2 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 112 | NFL | Rome Odunze 10 games | vs PHI@CHI | ANYTIME TD | 0.50 | +8000 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 113 | NFL | Rome Odunze 10 games | vs PHI@CHI | REC | 2.50 | +115 | 2.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.6 | 29 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 114 | NFL | Roschon Johnson 5 games | vs PHI@CHI | ANYTIME TD | 0.50 | +14000 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 115 | NFL | Sam Roush 1 games | vs PHI@CHI | ANYTIME TD | 0.50 | +20000 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 116 | NFL | Saquon Barkley 10 games | vs PHI@CHI | REC | 2.50 | +144 | 1 | -1.5 | 1/5 | +0.2 | 29 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 117 | NFL | Will Shipley 10 games | vs PHI@CHI | ANYTIME TD | 0.50 | +1800 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 118 | NFL | Zach Ertz 10 games | vs PHI@CHI | ANYTIME TD | 0.50 | +1000 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 29 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 119 | NFL | Saquon Barkley 10 games | vs PHI@CHI | REC YDS | 13.50 | -105 | 6.6 | -6.9 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 28 | F | -2.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 120 | NFL | Makai Lemon 2 games | vs PHI@CHI | REC YDS | 29.50 | +154 | 4.5 | -25 | 0/2 | +0 | 26 | F | 29.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 121 | NFL | Saquon Barkley 10 games | vs PHI@CHI | REC YDS | 12.50 | -113 | 6.6 | -5.9 | 1/5 | +0.4 | 26 | F | -2.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 122 | NFL | Makai Lemon 2 games | vs PHI@CHI | REC YDS | 28.50 | -110 | 4.5 | -24 | 0/2 | +0 | 25 | F | 29.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 123 | NFL | Luther Burden III 10 games | vs PHI@CHI | REC | 7.50 | +900 | 3.4 | -4.1 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 23 | F | 7.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 124 | NFL | Luther Burden III 10 games | vs PHI@CHI | REC YDS | 61.50 | +1000 | 39.2 | -22.3 | 1/5 | -16.7 | 23 | F | 61.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 125 | NFL | Makai Lemon 2 games | vs PHI@CHI | REC YDS | 26.50 | -113 | 4.5 | -22 | 0/2 | +0 | 23 | F | 29.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 126 | NFL | Makai Lemon 2 games | vs PHI@CHI | REC YDS | 27.50 | -115 | 4.5 | -23 | 0/2 | +0 | 23 | F | 29.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 127 | NFL | Rome Odunze 10 games | vs PHI@CHI | REC | 3.50 | +1400 | 2.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.6 | 23 | F | 3.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 128 | NFL | Rome Odunze 10 games | vs PHI@CHI | REC YDS | 44.50 | +1400 | 38.2 | -6.3 | 1/5 | -2.2 | 23 | F | 44.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 129 | NFL | Makai Lemon 2 games | vs PHI@CHI | REC YDS | 24.50 | -125 | 4.5 | -20 | 0/2 | +0 | 21 | F | 29.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 130 | NFL | Case Keenum | vs PHI@CHI | ANYTIME TD | 0.50 | +1700 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 131 | NFL | Case Keenum | vs PHI@CHI | INT | 0.50 | +2500 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 132 | NFL | Case Keenum | vs PHI@CHI | PASS ATT | 28.50 | -113 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | 34.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 133 | NFL | Case Keenum | vs PHI@CHI | PASS CMP | 17.50 | -105 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | 24.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 134 | NFL | Case Keenum | vs PHI@CHI | PASS CMP | 24.50 | +180 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | 24.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 135 | NFL | Case Keenum | vs PHI@CHI | PASS TDS | 0.50 | -215 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 136 | NFL | Case Keenum | vs PHI@CHI | PASS TDS | 2.50 | +4000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | 2.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 137 | NFL | Case Keenum | vs PHI@CHI | PASS YDS | 167.50 | -113 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | 247.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 138 | NFL | Case Keenum | vs PHI@CHI | PASS YDS | 169.50 | -113 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | 247.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 139 | NFL | Case Keenum | vs PHI@CHI | PASS YDS | 247.50 | +170 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | 247.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 140 | NFL | Case Keenum | vs PHI@CHI | RUSH YDS | 4.50 | -118 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | 6.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 141 | NFL | Chicago Bears D/ST | vs PHI@CHI | ANYTIME TD | 0.50 | +3000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 142 | NFL | Chicago Bears Defense | vs PHI@CHI | ANYTIME TD | 0.50 | +3000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 143 | NFL | No Scorer | vs PHI@CHI | ANYTIME TD | 0.50 | +3000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 144 | NFL | Philadelphia Eagles D/ST | vs PHI@CHI | ANYTIME TD | 0.50 | +5000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 145 | NFL | Philadelphia Eagles Defense | vs PHI@CHI | ANYTIME TD | 0.50 | +700 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 146 | NFL | Zavion Thomas | vs PHI@CHI | ANYTIME TD | 0.50 | +18000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.