Pre-game prop analysis powered by recent player performance. Every prop graded before tipoff.
| # | Sport | Player | Matchup | Stat | Line | Odds | L5 Avg | Edge | Hit | Trend | Score | Grade | Final | Over | Under | Books |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 501 | MLB | Luis Campusano 1 games | SD vs CHC@SDP | TB | 1.5 | +230 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 502 | MLB | Matt Olson 2 games | ATL vs PHI@ATL | R | 1.5 | +900 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/2 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 503 | MLB | Mauricio Dubon 10 games | ATL vs PHI@ATL | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 504 | MLB | Michael Busch 1 games | CHC vs CHC@SDP | R | 1.5 | +1100 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 505 | MLB | Michael Busch 10 games | CHC vs CHC@SDP | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 506 | MLB | Michael Busch 1 games | CHC vs CHC@SDP | TB | 1.5 | +450 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 507 | MLB | Michael Conforto 1 games | CHC vs CHC@SDP | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 508 | MLB | Michael Conforto 10 games | CHC vs CHC@SDP | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 509 | MLB | Michael Harris II 10 games | ATL vs PHI@ATL | RBI | 1.5 | +600 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 510 | MLB | Miguel Vargas 1 games | CHW vs CHW@HOU | TB | 1.5 | +900 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 511 | MLB | Mike Yastrzemski 10 games | ATL vs PHI@ATL | H | 1.5 | +475 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 512 | MLB | Mike Yastrzemski 10 games | ATL vs PHI@ATL | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 513 | MLB | Mike Yastrzemski 2 games | ATL vs PHI@ATL | TB | 1.5 | +240 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/2 | +0 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 514 | MLB | Munetaka Murakami 2 games | CHW vs CHW@HOU | R | 2.5 | +650 | 0.5 | -2 | 0/2 | +0 | 26 | F | 2.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 515 | MLB | Nick Sogard 10 games | BOS vs BOS@NYY | RBI | 1.5 | +1300 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 516 | MLB | Nico Hoerner 1 games | CHC vs CHC@SDP | R | 1.5 | +1500 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 517 | MLB | Nico Hoerner 10 games | CHC vs CHC@SDP | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 518 | MLB | Nico Hoerner 1 games | CHC vs CHC@SDP | TB | 1.5 | +575 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 26 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 519 | MLB | Ozzie Albies 10 games | ATL vs PHI@ATL | H | 1.5 | +300 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 520 | MLB | Ozzie Albies 2 games | ATL vs PHI@ATL | R | 1.5 | +1100 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/2 | +0 | 26 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 521 | MLB | Ozzie Albies 10 games | ATL vs PHI@ATL | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 522 | MLB | Ozzie Albies 2 games | ATL vs PHI@ATL | TB | 1.5 | +160 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/2 | +0 | 26 | F | 3.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 523 | MLB | Paul Goldschmidt 10 games | NYY vs BOS@NYY | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.4 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 524 | MLB | Pedro Ramirez 1 games | CHC vs CHC@SDP | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 525 | MLB | Pedro Ramirez 10 games | CHC vs CHC@SDP | RBI | 1.5 | +800 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.3 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 526 | MLB | Pete Crow-Armstrong 1 games | CHC vs CHC@SDP | R | 1.5 | +600 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 527 | MLB | Pete Crow-Armstrong 10 games | CHC vs CHC@SDP | RBI | 1.5 | +550 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 528 | MLB | Roman Anthony 1 games | BOS vs BOS@NYY | R | 1.5 | +1100 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 529 | MLB | Roman Anthony 10 games | BOS vs BOS@NYY | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.5 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 530 | MLB | Roman Anthony 1 games | BOS vs BOS@NYY | TB | 1.5 | +190 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 531 | MLB | Ronald Acuna Jr. 1 games | ATL vs PHI@ATL | R | 1.5 | +700 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 532 | MLB | Ronald Acuna Jr. 10 games | ATL vs PHI@ATL | RBI | 0.5 | +195 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.8 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 533 | MLB | Ronald Acuna Jr. 1 games | ATL vs PHI@ATL | TB | 1.5 | +125 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 534 | MLB | Sam Antonacci 2 games | CHW vs CHW@HOU | R | 1.5 | +800 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/2 | +0 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 535 | MLB | Sam Antonacci 10 games | CHW vs CHW@HOU | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 536 | MLB | Samad Taylor 1 games | SD vs CHC@SDP | R | 1.5 | +1100 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 537 | MLB | Samad Taylor 10 games | SD vs CHC@SDP | RBI | 0.5 | +340 | 0 | -0.5 | 0/5 | -0.7 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 538 | MLB | Sean Murphy 1 games | ATL vs PHI@ATL | R | 1.5 | +1300 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 539 | MLB | Sean Murphy 10 games | ATL vs PHI@ATL | RBI | 1.5 | +1000 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 540 | MLB | Seiya Suzuki 10 games | CHC vs CHC@SDP | RBI | 1.5 | +700 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | -0.2 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 541 | MLB | Taylor Trammell 10 games | HOU vs CHW@HOU | H | 1.5 | +500 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 542 | MLB | Taylor Trammell 2 games | HOU vs CHW@HOU | R | 1.5 | +1100 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/2 | +0 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 543 | MLB | Taylor Trammell 10 games | HOU vs CHW@HOU | RBI | 1.5 | +900 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 544 | MLB | Taylor Trammell 2 games | HOU vs CHW@HOU | TB | 1.5 | +300 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/2 | +0 | 26 | F | — | PENDING | PENDING | |
| 545 | MLB | Trea Turner 10 games | PHI vs PHI@ATL | RBI | 1.5 | +1100 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/5 | -0.1 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 546 | MLB | Trevor Story 10 games | BOS vs BOS@NYY | H | 0.5 | -115 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 1/5 | -0.7 | 26 | F | 1.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 547 | MLB | Trevor Story 1 games | BOS vs BOS@NYY | R | 1.5 | +2000 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 548 | MLB | Trevor Story 10 games | BOS vs BOS@NYY | RBI | 1.5 | +1100 | 0.2 | -1.3 | 0/5 | -0.4 | 26 | F | 0.0 | LOSS | WIN | |
| 549 | MLB | Trevor Story 1 games | BOS vs BOS@NYY | TB | 1.5 | +240 | 0 | -1.5 | 0/1 | +0 | 26 | F | 2.0 | WIN | LOSS | |
| 550 | MLB | Tristan Peters 10 games | CHW vs CHW@HOU | H | 1.5 | +400 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0/5 | +0.1 | 26 | F | 1.0 | LOSS | WIN |
Every prop scored on a 0–100 scale before tipoff — built to separate high-confidence plays from coin flips.
The Prop Grader analyzes every available player prop before games begin. It pulls recent performance data — the last 5 to 10 games — and runs each prop through a multi-factor scoring model. The result is a composite score and letter grade that tells you how confident the data is behind any given prop.
Scoring Factors
Edge vs Line (up to 35 pts) — How far the player's recent average sits above or below the prop line. A large positive edge means the player has been consistently clearing this number.
Hit Rate (up to 25 pts) — Out of the last 5 games, how many times did the player actually beat this line? A 5/5 hit rate earns full marks.
Trend (up to 15 pts) — Is the player trending up or down? Compares the last 3 games against the last 10 to detect momentum shifts.
Role Stability (up to 15 pts) — For NBA, this checks minutes consistency. A starter playing 34+ minutes with low variance is more predictable than someone fluctuating between 20 and 35.
Odds Value (up to 10 pts) — Props with plus-money or short juice are more valuable than heavily juiced lines. Better odds mean better expected value.
Grade Scale
A (85–100) — Elite. Strong edge, near-perfect hit rate, positive trend, stable role. These are the highest-confidence props on the board.
B (75–84) — Strong. Most factors are favorable. Solid plays with data backing them up.
C (65–74) — Average. The numbers lean positive but there may be a weak factor pulling the score down.
D (55–64) — Below average. The edge is thin or the recent track record is inconsistent.
F (below 55) — Weak. The data doesn't support this prop. Proceed with caution or skip entirely.
Grades are computed before tipoff using data available at that time. After games complete, each prop is matched against the actual box score and marked as a win, loss, or push.