📡 SCORES
🏈 Loading...

⚡ Nex Board

Mixed ranking engine — sides + props scored, ranked, and graded. Top 4 daily picks.

Nex Board Record
1D 7D 14D 30D |
← May 25 →
Wins
0
Losses
6
Win %
0%
Pending
0
Fri 10/30 Thu 10/29 Wed 10/28 Tue 10/27 Mon 10/26 Sun 10/25 Sat 10/24 Fri 10/23 Thu 10/22 Wed 10/21 Tue 10/20 Mon 10/19 Sun 10/18 Sat 10/17
Sport: All NBA MLB NFL WNBA
Stat:
🤖 AI Plays
1
Points 17.5 OVER
63.4 B-
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
51
Clean
27.4
Fit
4
2
Points 15.5 OVER
59.2 C+
  • Heavy minutes projection
Raw
62
Clean
16.6
Fit
4
3
Rebounds 9.5 OVER
58.6 C+
  • Heavy minutes projection
  • Stable player role
Raw
34
Clean
26.2
Fit
5
4
Assists 7.5 OVER
56.5 C
  • Heavy minutes projection
Raw
47
Clean
18.8
Fit
5

📋 Full Board (1283 picks · Page 33/52)

#ActionPickMatchupTypeLine ScoreTierCleanFit Result
801 Jacob Young WSH WSH @ CLE Runs 1.5 3.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
802 James Wood WSH WSH @ CLE Runs 1.5 3.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
803 Jose Tena WSH WSH @ CLE Hits 1.5 3.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
804 Jose Tena WSH WSH @ CLE Runs Batted In 1.5 3.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
805 Keibert Ruiz WSH WSH @ CLE Runs Batted In 1.5 3.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
806 Manny Machado SD PHI @ SD Hits 1.5 3.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
807 Manny Machado SD PHI @ SD Runs 1.5 3.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
808 Matt McLain CIN CIN @ NYM Hits 1.5 3.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
809 Miguel Vargas CWS MIN @ CWS Runs Batted In 1.5 3.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
810 Nasim Nunez WSH WSH @ CLE Hits 1.5 3.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
811 Nasim Nunez WSH WSH @ CLE Runs Batted In 1.5 3.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
812 Nasim Nunez WSH WSH @ CLE Total Bases 1.5 3.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
813 Nick Castellanos SD PHI @ SD Hits 1.5 3.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
814 Nick Castellanos SD PHI @ SD Runs 1.5 3.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
815 Ramon Laureano SD PHI @ SD Hits 1.5 3.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
816 Tyler Stephenson CIN CIN @ NYM Hits 1.5 3.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
817 Tyler Stephenson CIN CIN @ NYM Total Bases 1.5 3.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
818 Xavier Edwards MIA MIA @ TOR Runs 1.5 3.9 D 9.2 -5 Pending
819 Aaron Judge NYY NYY @ KC Total Bases 2.5 3.8 D 9.2 -5 Pending
820 Andrew Benintendi CWS MIN @ CWS Runs 1.5 3.6 D 9.2 -5 Pending
821 Blake Dunn CIN CIN @ NYM Runs Batted In 1.5 3.6 D 9.2 -5 Pending
822 Bo Bichette NYM CIN @ NYM Runs 1.5 3.6 D 9.2 -5 Pending
823 Brett Baty NYM CIN @ NYM Runs Batted In 1.5 3.6 D 9.2 -5 Pending
824 Colson Montgomery CWS MIN @ CWS Runs 1.5 3.6 D 9.2 -5 Pending
825 Colson Montgomery CWS MIN @ CWS Runs Batted In 1.5 3.6 D 9.2 -5 Pending
Showing 801–825 of 1283 picks

Methodology

A unified ranking engine that scores every pick on a 0–100 scale — props, sides, and totals on one board.

The Nex Engine doesn't just find edges — it ranks them. Every candidate pick runs through a four-layer scoring system that weighs the raw data, the play type's historical reliability, role stability, and how well it fits a winning daily card. The result is a single number that tells you exactly where each play stands relative to every other play on the board.

The 4 Scoring Dimensions

Raw Edge (50% weight) — The foundation. For props, this measures hit rate vs. the line, projected stat edge, minutes security, role stability, and usage opportunity. For sides, it factors injury edge, home court advantage, team strength gaps, recent form, and market alignment. This is where the pure data advantage lives.

Play-Type Trust — Not all play types are created equal. Moneylines on home favorites, star player rebounds, and small spreads have historically higher conversion rates — so they score higher. Role-player 3PM props and large spreads get docked because the variance is too high. This layer filters out plays that look good on paper but don't cash consistently.

Cleanliness — A stability check. Star players with locked-in minutes and defined roles score higher. Bench players, blowout-risk games, injury-dependent usage bumps, and hot-shooting reliance all get penalized. Clean plays are repeatable plays.

Card Fit — Built for daily card construction. This layer favors the pick types that historically perform on daily cards — moneylines, star rebounds and assists, tight spreads. It deprioritizes picks that might have edge in isolation but don't build well into a cohesive card.

Reading the Board

Score 75+ — Elite territory. These plays have strong edge across all four dimensions. The engine's highest conviction picks.

Score 65–74 — Strong plays with solid fundamentals. Multiple dimensions are firing and the overall profile is clean.

Score 55–64 — Above average. The edge is there, but one or two dimensions may be weaker. Still viable, especially in combination with other signals.

Below 55 — Below the recommended threshold. The engine sees some edge but not enough to rank it as a confident play.

The Nex Board rebuilds automatically as new odds and stats flow in. Scores and rankings can shift throughout the day as the market moves.